These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3514661)

  • 1. Evaluation of broth disk elution methods for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria with the newer beta-lactam antibiotics.
    Jorgensen JH; Redding JS; Howell AW
    J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Mar; 23(3):545-50. PubMed ID: 3514661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting the susceptibility of anaerobes to cefoperazone, cefotaxime, and cefoxitin with the thioglycolate broth disk procedure.
    Zabransky RJ; Birk RJ; Kurzynski TA; Toohey KL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Aug; 24(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 3745418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ceftizoxime and cefoxitin susceptibility testing against anaerobic bacteria: comparison of results from three NCCLS methods and quality control recommendations for the reference agar dilution procedure.
    Jones RN; Barry AL; Fuchs PC; Allen SD
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1987 Oct; 8(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 3480787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.
    Rosenblatt JE
    Rev Infect Dis; 1984; 6 Suppl 1():S242-8. PubMed ID: 6372033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of three broth disk methods for testing the susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to imipenem.
    Shungu DL; Weinberg E; Cerami AT
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jun; 21(6):875-9. PubMed ID: 3859487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discordant results between the broth disk elution and broth microdilution susceptibility tests with Bacteroides fragilis group isolates.
    Aldridge KE; Henderberg A; Schiro DD; Sanders CV
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Feb; 28(2):375-8. PubMed ID: 2312684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria determined by agar dilution and by a microbroth method.
    Baron EJ; Bruckner DA
    Rev Infect Dis; 1984; 6 Suppl 1():S249-53. PubMed ID: 6718938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative in vitro activity of 1-oxa-beta-lactam (LY127935) and cefoperazone with other beta-lactam antibiotics against anaerobic bacteria.
    Borobio MV; Aznar J; Jimenez R; Garcia F; Perea EJ
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Feb; 17(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 6247966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of agar dilution, microdilution, and disk elution methods for measuring the synergy of cefotaxime and its metabolite against anaerobes.
    Smith JA; Henry D; Ngui-Yen J; Castell A; Coderre S
    J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Jun; 23(6):1104-8. PubMed ID: 2872231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ceftazidime: in-vitro antibacterial activity and susceptibility to beta-lactamases compared with that of cefotaxime, moxalactam and other beta-lactam antibiotics.
    Phillips I; Warren C; Shannon K; King A; Hanslo D
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1981 Sep; 8 Suppl B():23-31. PubMed ID: 19802967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Broth-disk elution tests to predict the susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to the ampicillin-sulbactam combination.
    Jones RN
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1990; 13(4):353-5. PubMed ID: 2076598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Suitability of the broth-disk elution test for evaluating susceptibility of obligate anaerobes to trimethoprim-sulfonamides.
    Indiveri MC; Hirsh DC
    J Vet Diagn Invest; 1991 Jul; 3(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 1911991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of two broth disk methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobes.
    Helstad AG; Hutchinson MA; Amos WP; Kurzynski TA
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1984 Oct; 26(4):601-3. PubMed ID: 6517551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of susceptibility results of the Bacteroides fragilis group and other anaerobes by traditional MIC results and statistical methods.
    Aldridge KE; Johnson WD
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1997 Mar; 39(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 9096180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative antimicrobial activity of aminothiazolyl methoxyimino cephalosporins against anaerobic bacteria, including 100 cefoxitin-resistant isolates.
    Jones RN; Barry AL; Aldridge KE; Gerlach EH
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1987 Nov; 8(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 3501976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative in vitro beta-lactam activity against aerobic and anaerobic surgical isolates.
    Edmiston CE; Krepel CJ; Clausz JC; Condon RE
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1988 Feb; 9(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 3164263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An update on the in vitro activity of ceftizoxime and other cephalosporin/cephamycin antimicrobial agents against clinically significant anaerobic bacteria.
    Aldridge KE
    Clin Ther; 1990; 12 Suppl C():3-12. PubMed ID: 2202509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro activity of flomoxef compared to moxalactam, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, and clindamycin against anaerobes.
    Werner H; Heizmann W; Luft G
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1988 Nov; 38(11):1553-6. PubMed ID: 3214438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [In vitro effect of piperacillin, amoxicillin, cefoxitin and metronidazole against obligate anaerobic bacteria].
    Derriennic M; Reynaud A; Launay C; Courtieu AL
    Presse Med; 1986 Dec; 15(46):2279-81. PubMed ID: 2949268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Practical anaerobic broth-disk elution susceptibility test.
    Jorgensen JH; Alexander GA; Johnson JE
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Apr; 17(4):740-2. PubMed ID: 7396464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.