These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Three-years outcomes of simultaneous photorefractive surgery and customized corneal cross-linking for keratoconus. Alkharashi MS; Al-Essa RS; Abusayf MM Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Aug; 43(8):2963-2969. PubMed ID: 37067693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current perspectives on corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL). Subasinghe SK; Ogbuehi KC; Dias GJ Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 256(8):1363-1384. PubMed ID: 29623463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Standard cross-linking versus photorefractive keratectomy combined with accelerated cross-linking for keratoconus management: a comparative study. Iqbal M; Elmassry A; Tawfik A; Elgharieb M; Nagy K; Soliman A; Saad H; Tawfik T; Ali O; Gad A; El Saman I; Radwan A; Elzembely H; Abou Ali A; Fawzy O Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 97(4):e623-e631. PubMed ID: 30499232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraocular pressure after combined photorefractive keratectomy and corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus. Nabil KM; Elmassry AAK; Ntakarusho S; Said AA Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Dec; 43(12):4837-4849. PubMed ID: 37861937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complete corneal ring (MyoRing) implantation versus MyoRing implantation combined with corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: 3-year follow-up. Bikbova G; Kazakbaeva G; Bikbov M; Usubov E Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 38(3):1285-1293. PubMed ID: 28620706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. One-year visual and astigmatic outcomes of keratoconus patients following sequential crosslinking and topography-guided surface ablation: the TOPOLINK study. Nattis AS; Rosenberg ED; Donnenfeld ED J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Apr; 46(4):507-516. PubMed ID: 32271293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term visual, refractive, tomographic and aberrometric outcomes of corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) with or without hypoosmolar riboflavin solution in the treatment of progressive keratoconus patients with thin corneas. Celik Buyuktepe T; Ucakhan OO Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Apr; 260(4):1225-1235. PubMed ID: 34837507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accelerated versus standard corneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric keratoconus patients: 24 months follow-up results. Sarac O; Caglayan M; Uysal BS; Uzel AGT; Tanriverdi B; Cagil N Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Oct; 41(5):442-447. PubMed ID: 29910023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combined wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and corneal crosslinking for visual rehabilitation in moderate keratoconus. Gore DM; Leucci MT; Anand V; Fernandez-Vega Cueto L; Arba Mosquera S; Allan BD J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 May; 44(5):571-580. PubMed ID: 29891154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Photorefractive keratectomy followed by cross-linking versus cross-linking alone for management of progressive keratoconus: two-year follow-up. Alessio G; L'abbate M; Sborgia C; La Tegola MG Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Jan; 155(1):54-65.e1. PubMed ID: 23022158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of accelerated CXL alone, accelerated CXL-ICRS, and accelerated CXL-TG-PRK in progressive keratoconus and other corneal ectasias. Singal N; Ong Tone S; Stein R; Bujak MC; Chan CC; Chew HF; El-Defrawy S; Jin Y; Kranemann C; Rabinovitch T; Rootman DS; Slomovic AR; Cohen A; Dai D; Hatch W J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Feb; 46(2):276-286. PubMed ID: 32126042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy and safety of transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking surgery versus standard corneal collagen crosslinking surgery for keratoconus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Li W; Wang B BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):262. PubMed ID: 29282020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy and corneal collagen crosslinking after intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation for keratoconus. Kremer I; Aizenman I; Lichter H; Shayer S; Levinger S J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1802-7. PubMed ID: 22858060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of sequential vs same-day simultaneous collagen cross-linking and topography-guided PRK for treatment of keratoconus. Kanellopoulos AJ J Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 25(9):S812-8. PubMed ID: 19772257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative evaluation of progression rate in keratoconus before and after collagen crosslinking. Wang YM; Chan TC; Yu MCY; Jhanji V Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 102(8):1109-1113. PubMed ID: 29122823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transepithelial corneal collagen cross-linking using iontophoresis versus the Dresden protocol in progressive keratoconus: A meta-analysis. Wan KH; Ip CKY; Kua WN; Chow VWS; Chong KKL; Young AL; Cheng GPM; Jhanji V Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2021 Apr; 49(3):228-241. PubMed ID: 33667017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corneal cross-linking (CXL) combined with refractive surgery for the comprehensive management of keratoconus: CXL plus. Kankariya VP; Dube AB; Grentzelos MA; Kontadakis GA; Diakonis VF; Petrelli M; Kymionis GD Indian J Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 68(12):2757-2772. PubMed ID: 33229651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Morphological and functional correlations in riboflavin UV A corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus. Mazzotta C; Caporossi T; Denaro R; Bovone C; Sparano C; Paradiso A; Baiocchi S; Caporossi A Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 90(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 20456255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]