These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3514824)

  • 1. An investigation into the compatibility of some irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials and dental gypsum products. Part II. A refined discriminatory procedure.
    Owen CP
    J Oral Rehabil; 1986 Mar; 13(2):147-62. PubMed ID: 3514824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An investigation into the compatibility of some irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials and dental gypsum products. Part I. Capacity to record grooves on the international standard die.
    Owen CP
    J Oral Rehabil; 1986 Jan; 13(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 3511200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Linear distortion and compatibility of an antimicrobial irreversible hydrocolloid impression material and improved dental stones.
    Sevedge SR; Gunderson RB; Singer MT
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Nov; 62(5):612-5. PubMed ID: 2691667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vitro investigation into the physical properties of irreversible hydrocolloid alternatives.
    Patel RD; Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre CJ; Winer MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Nov; 104(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 20970539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of alginate impressions on the surface of cast gypsum. I. The physical and chemical structure of the cast surface.
    Jarvis RG; Earnshaw R
    Aust Dent J; 1980 Dec; 25(6):349-56. PubMed ID: 6940533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Irreversible hydrocolloids for crown and bridge impressions: effect of different treatments on compatibility of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material with type IV gypsums.
    Eriksson A; Ockert-Eriksson G; Lockowandt P; Lindén LA
    Dent Mater; 1996 Mar; 12(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 9002847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gypsum compatibility of antimicrobial alginates after spray disinfection.
    King BB; Norling BK; Seals R
    J Prosthodont; 1994 Dec; 3(4):219-27. PubMed ID: 7866505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Compatibility of agar hydrocolloid duplicating materials with dental stones.
    Barrett NV; Brukl CE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Oct; 54(4):586-91. PubMed ID: 3862819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of alginate impressions on the surface of cast gypsum. II. The role of sodium sulphate in incompatibility.
    Jarvis RG; Earnshaw R
    Aust Dent J; 1981 Feb; 26(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 7018476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A universal boxing procedure: irreversible hydrocolloid and magnetic strip.
    NaBadalung DP; Connelly ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Aug; 80(2):262-4. PubMed ID: 9710834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Irreversible hydrocolloid and gypsum interactions.
    Reisbick MH; Johnston WM; Rashid RG
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 9484064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of disinfection on irreversible hydrocolloid and alternative impression materials and the resultant gypsum casts.
    Suprono MS; Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre CJ; Winer MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 23031732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.
    Johnson GH; Chellis KD; Gordon GE; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 9576321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of disinfection on irreversible hydrocolloid and type III gypsum casts.
    Hussain SM; Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Moles DR
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2006 Jun; 14(2):50-4. PubMed ID: 16808104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of delayed pouring on irreversible hydrocolloid properties.
    Rodrigues SB; Augusto CR; Leitune VC; Samuel SM; Collares FM
    Braz Oral Res; 2012; 26(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 23018227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physical properties and compatibility with dental stones of current alginate impression materials.
    Murata H; Kawamura M; Hamada T; Chimori H; Nikawa H
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Nov; 31(11):1115-22. PubMed ID: 15525391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface roughness of dental stone casts from alginate impressions.
    Keuter FM; Davidson CL
    J Dent; 1986 Feb; 14(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 3546427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compatibility of reversible hydrocolloid duplicating materials and dental stones.
    Williams EO; Hartman GE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Nov; 52(5):699-703. PubMed ID: 6593462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EVALUATION OF MATERIALS USED FOR INDIRECT TECHNICS.
    PEYTON FA
    Dent Clin North Am; 1965 Mar; 23():213-23. PubMed ID: 14276026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.