These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35148647)

  • 1. Resentment Is Like Drinking Poison? The Heterogeneous Health Effects of Affective Polarization.
    Nelson MH
    J Health Soc Behav; 2022 Dec; 63(4):508-524. PubMed ID: 35148647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Disclosing political partisanship polarizes first impressions of faces.
    Cassidy BS; Hughes C; Krendl AC
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0276400. PubMed ID: 36350842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Political polarization projection: social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes.
    Van Boven L; Judd CM; Sherman DK
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jul; 103(1):84-100. PubMed ID: 22545744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.
    Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudes.
    Voelkel JG; Chu J; Stagnaro MN; Mernyk JS; Redekopp C; Pink SL; Druckman JN; Rand DG; Willer R
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Jan; 7(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 36316497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding public opinion in debates over biomedical research: looking beyond political partisanship to focus on beliefs about science and society.
    Nisbet M; Markowitz EM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88473. PubMed ID: 24558393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Belief in the Utility of Cross-Partisan Empathy Reduces Partisan Animosity and Facilitates Political Persuasion.
    Santos LA; Voelkel JG; Willer R; Zaki J
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Sep; 33(9):1557-1573. PubMed ID: 36041234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Placing "trust" in science: The urban-rural divide and Americans' feelings of warmth toward scientists.
    Krause NM
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Jul; 32(5):596-604. PubMed ID: 36648007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Partisan niche construction: Out-party affect, geographic sorting, and mate selection.
    Arreguin C
    Politics Life Sci; 2023 Nov; 42(2):254-276. PubMed ID: 37987571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Negative partisanship is not more prevalent than positive partisanship.
    Lee AH; Lelkes Y; Hawkins CB; Theodoridis AG
    Nat Hum Behav; 2022 Jul; 6(7):951-963. PubMed ID: 35589827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America.
    Druckman JN; Klar S; Krupnikov Y; Levendusky M; Ryan JB
    Nat Hum Behav; 2021 Jan; 5(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 33230283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facebook's Spiral of Silence and Participation: The Role of Political Expression on Facebook and Partisan Strength in Political Participation.
    Kim M
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2016 Dec; 19(12):696-702. PubMed ID: 27849357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The dynamics of health care opinion, 2008-2010: partisanship, self-interest, and racial resentment.
    Henderson M; Hillygus DS
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2011 Dec; 36(6):945-60. PubMed ID: 22232419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 'Them' without 'us': negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil.
    Areal J
    Political Res Exch; 2022; 4(1):2117635. PubMed ID: 36147779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Issue alignment and partisanship in the American public: Revisiting the 'partisans without constraint' thesis.
    Kozlowski AC; Murphy JP
    Soc Sci Res; 2021 Feb; 94():102498. PubMed ID: 33648681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Generically partisan: Polarization in political communication.
    Novoa G; Echelbarger M; Gelman A; Gelman SA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Nov; 120(47):e2309361120. PubMed ID: 37956300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Political probity increases trust in government: Evidence from randomized survey experiments.
    Martin A; Orr R; Peyton K; Faulkner N
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0225818. PubMed ID: 32092084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The populist hotbed: How political attitudes, resentment, and justice beliefs predict both exposure to and avoidance of specific populist news features in the United States.
    Scherr S; Leiner D
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258220. PubMed ID: 34618837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attitude networks as intergroup realities: Using network-modelling to research attitude-identity relationships in polarized political contexts.
    Lüders A; Carpentras D; Quayle M
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2024 Jan; 63(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 37431984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Social Trust in Polarized Times: How Perceptions of Political Polarization Affect Americans' Trust in Each Other.
    Lee AH
    Polit Behav; 2022; 44(3):1533-1554. PubMed ID: 35340916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.