These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3514871)

  • 1. Accuracy of a hydrophilic irreversible hydrocolloid/silicone impression material.
    Davis DR; Preble JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Mar; 55(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 3514871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New irreversible hydrocolloid silicone impression material.
    Eames WB; Litvak CS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Oct; 52(4):479-84. PubMed ID: 6594507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.
    Johnson GH; Chellis KD; Gordon GE; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 9576321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Impression and model materials, a functional unit].
    Finger W; Lockowandt P
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1972 Jul; 27(7):620-4. PubMed ID: 4557300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental study on the use of spacer foils in two-step putty and wash impression procedures using silicone impression materials.
    Mann K; Davids A; Range U; Richter G; Boening K; Reitemeier B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 25453563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vertical distortion in distal extension ridges and palatal area of casts made by different techniques.
    Wang HY; Lu YC; Shiau YY; Tsou D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Mar; 75(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 8648579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of impression materials for complete-arch fixed partial dentures.
    Dounis GS; Ziebert GJ; Dounis KS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Feb; 65(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 2051350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of irreversible hydrocolloids (alginates) for fixed prosthodontics. A comparison between irreversible hydrocolloid, reversible hydrocolloid, and addition silicone for use in the syringe-tray technique.
    Eriksson A; Ockert-Eriksson G; Lockowandt P
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1998 Apr; 106(2 Pt 1):651-60. PubMed ID: 9584912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Studies on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials. Part 2. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of casts made by both single polyether rubber impression and the combined reversible and irreversible hydrocolloid impression technique (author's transl)].
    Shigeto N; Inohara N; Yamada S
    Hiroshima Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1978; 10(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 396327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of the impression replica technique.
    Falk A; Vult von Steyern P; Fransson H; Thorén MM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(2):179-80. PubMed ID: 25822305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of castings obtained using 2 impression materials. Van-R reversible hydrocolloid and vinyl polysiloxane 3M Express].
    Zemella A
    Dent Cadmos; 1986 Nov; 54(17):81-8. PubMed ID: 3556232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A NEW APPROACH TO IMPRESSION TAKING FOR CROWN AND BRIDGE.
    CANNISTRACI AJ
    Dent Clin North Am; 1965 Mar; 29():33-42. PubMed ID: 14278956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy and bond strength of reversible with irreversible hydrocolloid impression systems: a comparative study.
    Heisler WH; Tjan AH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Oct; 68(4):578-84. PubMed ID: 1403933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns--validation of the silicone replica method.
    Laurent M; Scheer P; Dejou J; Laborde G
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Feb; 35(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 18197844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Ceramics and metals. A difficult marriage].
    Abbondanza T
    Attual Dent; 1985 Sep; 1(22):72-3, 75-7. PubMed ID: 3914300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized controlled clinical study on the accuracy of two-stage putty-and-wash impression materials.
    Haim M; Luthardt RG; Rudolph H; Koch R; Walter MH; Quaas S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 19548415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique.
    Hung SH; Purk JH; Tira DE; Eick JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 May; 67(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 1527737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dimensional Stability and Acuracy of Silicone - Based Impression Materials Using Different Impression Techniques - A Literature Review.
    Naumovski B; Kapushevska B
    Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2017 Sep; 38(2):131-138. PubMed ID: 28991761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Irreversible hydrocolloids for crown and bridge impressions: effect of different treatments on compatibility of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material with type IV gypsums.
    Eriksson A; Ockert-Eriksson G; Lockowandt P; Lindén LA
    Dent Mater; 1996 Mar; 12(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 9002847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of healing abutments for the fabrication of cement-retained, implant-supported provisional prostheses.
    Proussaefs P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Mar; 87(3):333-5. PubMed ID: 11941363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.