These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3514877)
1. The effect of chewing movements on changing mandibular complete dentures to osseointegrated overdentures. Jemt T; Stålblad PA J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Mar; 55(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 3514877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-year clinical outcome of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures--results of preliminary prospective study. Harder S; Wolfart S; Egert C; Kern M J Dent; 2011 Oct; 39(10):656-61. PubMed ID: 21821093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comminution of food with mandibular implant-retained overdentures. Geertman ME; Slagter AP; van Waas MA; Kalk W J Dent Res; 1994 Dec; 73(12):1858-64. PubMed ID: 7814759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of implants on maximum bite force in edentulous patients. Rismanchian M; Bajoghli F; Mostajeran Z; Fazel A; Eshkevari Ps J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 19813425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does a prosthodontist spend more time providing mandibular two-implant overdentures than conventional dentures? Takanashi Y; Penrod JR; Chehade A; Klemetti E; Savard A; Lund JP; Feine JS Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 12170856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The extent of maintenance required by implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year report. Davis DM; Rogers JO; Packer ME Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(6):767-74. PubMed ID: 8990639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes in chewing patterns of patients with complete dentures after placement of osseointegrated implants in the mandible. Jemt T; Lindquist L; Hedegard B J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Apr; 53(4):578-83. PubMed ID: 3858522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oral rehabilitation using osseointegrated implants in a patient with idiopathic torsion dystonia. Peñarrocha M; Sanchis JM; Rambla J; Guarinos J Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):433-5. PubMed ID: 11432664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I--Retention, stability, and tissue response. Burns DR; Unger JW; Elswick RK; Beck DA J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Apr; 73(4):354-63. PubMed ID: 7783014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Denture satisfaction in a comparative study of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a randomized clinical trial. Geertman ME; van Waas MA; van 't Hof MA; Kalk W Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 8666450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures. Abd El-Dayem MA; Assad AS; Eldin Sanad ME; Mahmoud Mogahed SA Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 20009604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants in the totally edentulous. Three years experience]. Barrachina Mataix M; Martinez Corria R; Jimenez Lopez V; Tome Arias J; Barrachina Mataix A; Santamaria Zuazua J Rev Actual Estomatol Esp; 1989 Oct; 49(387):25-8, 31-4, 37-40 passim. PubMed ID: 2701249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part I: Methodology and clinical outcomes. Kapur KK; Garrett NR; Hamada MO; Roumanas ED; Freymiller E; Han T; Diener RM; Levin S; Ida R J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):555-69. PubMed ID: 9597609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems. Payne AG; Solomons YF Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 11203640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in chewing patterns after implantation in the edentulous mandible. Benzing U; Weber H; Simonis A; Engel E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1994; 9(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 8206557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of three different attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: one-year report. Kleis WK; Kämmerer PW; Hartmann S; Al-Nawas B; Wagner W Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 19416278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sex differences in denture satisfaction. Pan S; Awad M; Thomason JM; Dufresne E; Kobayashi T; Kimoto S; Wollin SD; Feine JS J Dent; 2008 May; 36(5):301-8. PubMed ID: 18394770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of different attachment systems with implant-retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMG. Uçankale M; Akoğlu B; Ozkan Y; Ozkan YK Gerodontology; 2012 Mar; 29(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 20604812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]