187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35149107)
1. Modeling spatial variation of gaseous air pollutants and particulate matters in a Metropolitan area using mobile monitoring data.
Xu J; Yang W; Bai Z; Zhang R; Zheng J; Wang M; Zhu T
Environ Res; 2022 Jul; 210():112858. PubMed ID: 35149107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Personal and ambient exposures to air toxics in Camden, New Jersey.
Lioy PJ; Fan Z; Zhang J; Georgopoulos P; Wang SW; Ohman-Strickland P; Wu X; Zhu X; Harrington J; Tang X; Meng Q; Jung KH; Kwon J; Hernandez M; Bonnano L; Held J; Neal J;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Aug; (160):3-127; discussion 129-51. PubMed ID: 22097188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Machine Learning and Land Use Regression for fine scale spatiotemporal estimation of ambient air pollution: Modeling ozone concentrations across the contiguous United States.
Ren X; Mi Z; Georgopoulos PG
Environ Int; 2020 Sep; 142():105827. PubMed ID: 32593834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and application of an aerosol screening model for size-resolved urban aerosols.
Stanier CO; Lee SR;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2014 Jun; (179):3-79. PubMed ID: 25145039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The London low emission zone baseline study.
Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scalable Multipollutant Exposure Assessment Using Routine Mobile Monitoring Platforms.
Apte JA; Chambliss SE; Messier KP; Gani S; Upadhya AR; Kushwaha M; Sreekanth V
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2024 Jan; (216):1-54. PubMed ID: 38482936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of linear regression, regularization, and machine learning algorithms to develop Europe-wide spatial models of fine particles and nitrogen dioxide.
Chen J; de Hoogh K; Gulliver J; Hoffmann B; Hertel O; Ketzel M; Bauwelinck M; van Donkelaar A; Hvidtfeldt UA; Katsouyanni K; Janssen NAH; Martin RV; Samoli E; Schwartz PE; Stafoggia M; Bellander T; Strak M; Wolf K; Vienneau D; Vermeulen R; Brunekreef B; Hoek G
Environ Int; 2019 Sep; 130():104934. PubMed ID: 31229871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Part 1. Statistical Learning Methods for the Effects of Multiple Air Pollution Constituents.
Coull BA; Bobb JF; Wellenius GA; Kioumourtzoglou MA; Mittleman MA; Koutrakis P; Godleski JJ
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):5-50. PubMed ID: 26333238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatiotemporal variations of air pollutants and ozone prediction using machine learning algorithms in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region from 2014 to 2021.
Lyu Y; Ju Q; Lv F; Feng J; Pang X; Li X
Environ Pollut; 2022 Aug; 306():119420. PubMed ID: 35526642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of high-resolution spatio-temporal models for ambient air pollution in a metropolitan area of China from 2013 to 2019.
Wang Y; Huang C; Hu J; Wang M
Chemosphere; 2022 Mar; 291(Pt 2):132918. PubMed ID: 34798111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-resolution modeling for criteria air pollutants and the associated air quality index in a metropolitan city.
Wang Y; Huang L; Huang C; Hu J; Wang M
Environ Int; 2023 Feb; 172():107752. PubMed ID: 36709673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A land use regression model using machine learning and locally developed low cost particulate matter sensors in Uganda.
Coker ES; Amegah AK; Mwebaze E; Ssematimba J; Bainomugisha E
Environ Res; 2021 Aug; 199():111352. PubMed ID: 34043968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of air pollutants on pediatric admissions for Mycoplasma pneumonia: a cross-sectional study in Shanghai, China.
Chen N; Shi J; Huang J; Yu W; Liu R; Gu L; Yang R; Yu Z; Liu Q; Yang Y; Cui S; Wang Z
BMC Public Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):447. PubMed ID: 32252726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors influencing the spatial extent of mobile source air pollution impacts: a meta-analysis.
Zhou Y; Levy JI
BMC Public Health; 2007 May; 7():89. PubMed ID: 17519039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating 2013-2019 NO
Huang C; Sun K; Hu J; Xue T; Xu H; Wang M
Environ Pollut; 2022 Jan; 292(Pt A):118285. PubMed ID: 34634409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Concentrations of criteria pollutants in the contiguous U.S., 1979 - 2015: Role of prediction model parsimony in integrated empirical geographic regression.
Kim SY; Bechle M; Hankey S; Sheppard L; Szpiro AA; Marshall JD
PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228535. PubMed ID: 32069301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Land use regression modeling of ultrafine particles, ozone, nitrogen oxides and markers of particulate matter pollution in Augsburg, Germany.
Wolf K; Cyrys J; Harciníková T; Gu J; Kusch T; Hampel R; Schneider A; Peters A
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Feb; 579():1531-1540. PubMed ID: 27916311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
