These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A comparison of para-anastomotic compliance profiles after vascular anastomosis: nonpenetrating clips versus standard sutures. Baguneid MS; Goldner S; Fulford PE; Hamilton G; Walker MG; Seifalian AM J Vasc Surg; 2001 Apr; 33(4):812-20. PubMed ID: 11296337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of suture technique on arterial anastomotic compliance. Klein SR; Goldberg L; Miranda RM; Bosco P; Nelson RJ; White RA Arch Surg; 1982 Jan; 117(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 7034672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Blood flow pattern and anastomotic compliance for interrupted versus continuous coronary bypass grafts. Gerdisch M; Hinkamp T; Ainsworth SD Heart Surg Forum; 2003; 6(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 12716584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Animal model to compare the effects of suture technique on cross-sectional compliance on end-to-side anastomoses. Tozzi P; Hayoz D; Ruchat P; Corno A; Oedman C; Botta U; von Segesser LK Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2001 Apr; 19(4):477-81. PubMed ID: 11306316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The direct effect of graft compliance mismatch per se on development of host arterial intimal hyperplasia at the anastomotic interface. Wu MH; Shi Q; Sauvage LR; Kaplan S; Hayashida N; Patel MD; Wechezak AR; Walker MW Ann Vasc Surg; 1993 Mar; 7(2):156-68. PubMed ID: 8518133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new combined "interrupted-continuous" microvascular anastomotic technique. Experimental study and clinical application. Lykoudis EG; Spyropoulou GA; Liadakis GN; Papaliodi ET J Reconstr Microsurg; 2008 Feb; 24(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 18415927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanics of spatulated end-to-end artery-to-vein anastomoses. Morasch MD; Dobrin PB; Dong QS; Mrkvicka R Ann Vasc Surg; 1998 Jan; 12(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 9451997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Compliance of vascular anastomoses with polybutester and polypropylene sutures. Megerman J; Hamilton G; Schmitz-Rixen T; Abbott WM J Vasc Surg; 1993 Nov; 18(5):827-34. PubMed ID: 8230570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of suture technique and suture material selection on the mechanics of end-to-end and end-to-side anastomoses. Baumgartner N; Dobrin PB; Morasch M; Dong QS; Mrkvicka R J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 May; 111(5):1063-72. PubMed ID: 8622304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of continuous and interrupted suture techniques in microvascular end-to-side anastomosis. Wheatley MJ; Mathes SJ; Hassett C J Reconstr Microsurg; 1986 Jan; 2(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 3511253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microvascular anastomoses in growing vessels: a long-term evaluation of nonabsorbable suture materials. Chen LE; Seaber AV; Urbaniak JR J Reconstr Microsurg; 1993 May; 9(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 8515396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rotational in vitro compliance measurement of diverse anastomotic configurations: a tool for anastomotic engineering. Knez P; Nelson K; Hakimi M; Al-Haidary J; Schneider C; Schmitz-Rixen T J Biomech; 2004 Mar; 37(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 14757445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does vascular stapling improve compliance of vascular anastomoses? Stansby G; Knez P; Berwanger CS; Nelson K; Reichert V; Schmitz-Rixen T Vasc Surg; 2001; 35(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 11668379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Initial Resistance of Carina Anastomoses with Increasing Tensile Stress: An ex vivo Model Comparing Different Suture Techniques. Kirschbaum A; Hemmerling S; Steinfeldt T; Bartsch DK; Mirow N Eur Surg Res; 2017; 58(1-2):20-26. PubMed ID: 27577554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]