These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35149711)

  • 21. Point-of-care testing of the international normalized ratio in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies.
    Perry SL; Samsa GP; Ortel TL
    Thromb Haemost; 2005 Dec; 94(6):1196-202. PubMed ID: 16411394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of international normalized ratio measurement between CoaguChek XS Plus and STA-R coagulation analyzers.
    Hur M; Kim H; Park CM; La Gioia A; Choi SG; Choi JH; Moon HW; Yun YM
    Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():213109. PubMed ID: 23509691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of the INR Values Measured by CoaguChek XS Coagulometer and Conventional Laboratory Methods in Patients on VKA Therapy.
    Kalçık M; Yesin M; Gürsoy MO; Gündüz S; Karakoyun S; Astarcıoğlu MA; Bayam E; Cerşit S; Özkan M
    Clin Appl Thromb Hemost; 2017 Mar; 23(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 26177662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparative study of prothrombin complex concentrates and fresh-frozen plasma for warfarin reversal under static and flow conditions.
    Ogawa S; Szlam F; Ohnishi T; Molinaro RJ; Hosokawa K; Tanaka KA
    Thromb Haemost; 2011 Dec; 106(6):1215-23. PubMed ID: 22071880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the i-STAT point-of-care capillary whole blood prothrombin time and international normalized ratio: comparison to the Tcoag MDAII coagulation analyzer in the central laboratory.
    Peña JA; Lewandrowski KB; Lewandrowski EL; Gregory K; Baron JM; Van Cott EM
    Clin Chim Acta; 2012 Jun; 413(11-12):955-9. PubMed ID: 22330876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Correlation of point-of-care International Normalized Ratio to laboratory International Normalized Ratio in hemodialysis patients taking warfarin.
    Hoel RW; Albright RC; Beyer LK; Santrach PJ; Magtibay DL; Everson SL; McBane RD
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2009 Jan; 4(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 18987294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Results of the performance verification of the CoaguChek XS system.
    Plesch W; Wolf T; Breitenbeck N; Dikkeschei LD; Cervero A; Perez PL; van den Besselaar AM
    Thromb Res; 2008; 123(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 18585761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Design and evaluation of a portable optical-based biosensor for testing whole blood prothrombin time.
    Yang CL; Huang SJ; Chou CW; Chiou YC; Lin KP; Tsai MS; Young KC
    Talanta; 2013 Nov; 116():704-11. PubMed ID: 24148464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Performance of a point-of-care device in determining prothrombin time in an anticoagulation clinic.
    Colella MP; Fiusa MM; Orsi FL; de Paula EV; Annichino-Bizzacchi JM
    Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2012 Mar; 23(2):172-4. PubMed ID: 22246165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contributions of procoagulants and anticoagulants to the international normalized ratio and thrombin generation assay in patients treated with warfarin: potential role of protein Z as a powerful determinant of coagulation assays.
    Choi Q; Kim JE; Hyun J; Han KS; Kim HK
    Thromb Res; 2013 Jul; 132(1):e70-5. PubMed ID: 23769659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Association Between the Prothrombin Time-International Normalized Ratio and Concomitant Use of Antibiotics in Warfarin Users: Focus on Type of Antibiotic and Susceptibility of
    Yagi T; Naito T; Kato A; Hirao K; Kawakami J
    Ann Pharmacother; 2021 Feb; 55(2):157-164. PubMed ID: 32633584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparability of the results of PT-INR with local MNPT and APTTR with MNAPTT on different coagulation analyzers in China.
    Peng L; Yan C; Wu X; Nie L
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2009 Jun; 31(3):352-8. PubMed ID: 18510575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Optimizing the Verification of Mean Normal Prothrombin Time (MNPT) and International Sensitivity Index (ISI) for Accurate Conversion of Prothrombin Time (PT) to International Normalized Ratio (INR).
    Favaloro EJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1646():59-74. PubMed ID: 28804818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Emergency medicine misconceptions: Utility of routine coagulation panels in the emergency department setting.
    Long B; Long DA; Koyfman A
    Am J Emerg Med; 2020 Jun; 38(6):1226-1232. PubMed ID: 32029342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Evaluation of Portable Coagulation Analyzer in Comparison with Conventional Hospital Laboratory Instrument with Stratification of International Normalized Ratios by Therapeutic Upper Limit].
    Sasaki K; Sato K; Suzuki M; Kumagai K; Adachi O; Saiki Y
    Kyobu Geka; 2016 May; 69(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 27220921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The international normalized ratio according to Owren in liver disease: interlaboratory assessment and determination of international sensitivity index.
    Magnusson M; Sten-Linder M; Bergquist A; Rajani R; Kechagias S; Fischler B; Németh A; Lindahl TL
    Thromb Res; 2013 Sep; 132(3):346-51. PubMed ID: 23993902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the Q analyzer, a new cap-piercing fully automated coagulometer with clotting, chromogenic, and immunoturbidometric capability.
    Kitchen S; Woolley A
    Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2013 Jan; 24(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 23249565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Importance of device evaluation for point-of-care prothrombin time international normalized ratio testing programs.
    McBane RD; Felty CL; Hartgers ML; Chaudhry R; Beyer LK; Santrach PJ
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2005 Feb; 80(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 15704772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Capillary whole blood testing by a new portable monitor. Comparison with standard determination of the international normalized ratio.
    de Miguel D; Burgaleta C; Reyes E; Pascual T
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jul; 120(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 12866369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison between international normalized ratio using a portable device and conventional methodology.
    De Piano LP; Strunz CM; Mansur Ade P; Rached RA
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2007 Jan; 88(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 17364115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.