These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35150258)

  • 1. Improving genomic predictions with inbreeding and nonadditive effects in two admixed maize hybrid populations in single and multienvironment contexts.
    Roth M; Beugnot A; Mary-Huard T; Moreau L; Charcosset A; Fiévet JB
    Genetics; 2022 Apr; 220(4):. PubMed ID: 35150258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reciprocal Genetics: Identifying QTL for General and Specific Combining Abilities in Hybrids Between Multiparental Populations from Two Maize (
    Giraud H; Bauland C; Falque M; Madur D; Combes V; Jamin P; Monteil C; Laborde J; Palaffre C; Gaillard A; Blanchard P; Charcosset A; Moreau L
    Genetics; 2017 Nov; 207(3):1167-1180. PubMed ID: 28971957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic prediction of hybrid crops allows disentangling dominance and epistasis.
    González-Diéguez D; Legarra A; Charcosset A; Moreau L; Lehermeier C; Teyssèdre S; Vitezica ZG
    Genetics; 2021 May; 218(1):. PubMed ID: 33864072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dominance Effects and Functional Enrichments Improve Prediction of Agronomic Traits in Hybrid Maize.
    Ramstein GP; Larsson SJ; Cook JP; Edwards JW; Ersoz ES; Flint-Garcia S; Gardner CA; Holland JB; Lorenz AJ; McMullen MD; Millard MJ; Rocheford TR; Tuinstra MR; Bradbury PJ; Buckler ES; Romay MC
    Genetics; 2020 May; 215(1):215-230. PubMed ID: 32152047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accounting for Group-Specific Allele Effects and Admixture in Genomic Predictions: Theory and Experimental Evaluation in Maize.
    Rio S; Moreau L; Charcosset A; Mary-Huard T
    Genetics; 2020 Sep; 216(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 32680885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genomic models with genotype × environment interaction for predicting hybrid performance: an application in maize hybrids.
    Acosta-Pech R; Crossa J; de Los Campos G; Teyssèdre S; Claustres B; Pérez-Elizalde S; Pérez-Rodríguez P
    Theor Appl Genet; 2017 Jul; 130(7):1431-1440. PubMed ID: 28401254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phenotypic Data from Inbred Parents Can Improve Genomic Prediction in Pearl Millet Hybrids.
    Liang Z; Gupta SK; Yeh CT; Zhang Y; Ngu DW; Kumar R; Patil HT; Mungra KD; Yadav DV; Rathore A; Srivastava RK; Gupta R; Yang J; Varshney RK; Schnable PS; Schnable JC
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Jul; 8(7):2513-2522. PubMed ID: 29794163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genome properties and prospects of genomic prediction of hybrid performance in a breeding program of maize.
    Technow F; Schrag TA; Schipprack W; Bauer E; Simianer H; Melchinger AE
    Genetics; 2014 Aug; 197(4):1343-55. PubMed ID: 24850820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The importance of dominance and genotype-by-environment interactions on grain yield variation in a large-scale public cooperative maize experiment.
    Rogers AR; Dunne JC; Romay C; Bohn M; Buckler ES; Ciampitti IA; Edwards J; Ertl D; Flint-Garcia S; Gore MA; Graham C; Hirsch CN; Hood E; Hooker DC; Knoll J; Lee EC; Lorenz A; Lynch JP; McKay J; Moose SP; Murray SC; Nelson R; Rocheford T; Schnable JC; Schnable PS; Sekhon R; Singh M; Smith M; Springer N; Thelen K; Thomison P; Thompson A; Tuinstra M; Wallace J; Wisser RJ; Xu W; Gilmour AR; Kaeppler SM; De Leon N; Holland JB
    G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33585867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic prediction of hybrid performance in maize with models incorporating dominance and population specific marker effects.
    Technow F; Riedelsheimer C; Schrag TA; Melchinger AE
    Theor Appl Genet; 2012 Oct; 125(6):1181-94. PubMed ID: 22733443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unraveling the potential of phenomic selection within and among diverse breeding material of maize (Zea mays L.).
    Weiß TM; Zhu X; Leiser WL; Li D; Liu W; Schipprack W; Melchinger AE; Hahn V; Würschum T
    G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 35100379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling copy number variation in the genomic prediction of maize hybrids.
    Lyra DH; Galli G; Alves FC; Granato ÍSC; Vidotti MS; Bandeira E Sousa M; Morosini JS; Crossa J; Fritsche-Neto R
    Theor Appl Genet; 2019 Jan; 132(1):273-288. PubMed ID: 30382311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of additive, epistatic, and dominance effects using models accounting for incomplete inbreeding in parental lines of hybrid rye and sugar beet.
    Kristensen PS; Sarup P; Fé D; Orabi J; Snell P; Ripa L; Mohlfeld M; Chu TT; Herrström J; Jahoor A; Jensen J
    Front Plant Sci; 2023; 14():1193433. PubMed ID: 38162304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Environment-specific genomic prediction ability in maize using environmental covariates depends on environmental similarity to training data.
    Rogers AR; Holland JB
    G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 35100364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linkage Analysis and Association Mapping QTL Detection Models for Hybrids Between Multiparental Populations from Two Heterotic Groups: Application to Biomass Production in Maize (
    Giraud H; Bauland C; Falque M; Madur D; Combes V; Jamin P; Monteil C; Laborde J; Palaffre C; Gaillard A; Blanchard P; Charcosset A; Moreau L
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Nov; 7(11):3649-3657. PubMed ID: 28963164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revisiting hybrid breeding designs using genomic predictions: simulations highlight the superiority of incomplete factorials between segregating families over topcross designs.
    Seye AI; Bauland C; Charcosset A; Moreau L
    Theor Appl Genet; 2020 Jun; 133(6):1995-2010. PubMed ID: 32185420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of recombination in the parent populations on the means and combining ability variances in hybrid populations of maize ( Zea mays L.).
    Melchinger AE; Geiger HH; Utz HF; Schnell FW
    Theor Appl Genet; 2003 Jan; 106(2):332-40. PubMed ID: 12582860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic Studies Reveal Substantial Dominant Effects and Improved Genomic Predictions in an Open-Pollinated Breeding Population of
    Thavamanikumar S; Arnold RJ; Luo J; Thumma BR
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Oct; 10(10):3751-3763. PubMed ID: 32788286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beyond Genomic Prediction: Combining Different Types of
    Schrag TA; Westhues M; Schipprack W; Seifert F; Thiemann A; Scholten S; Melchinger AE
    Genetics; 2018 Apr; 208(4):1373-1385. PubMed ID: 29363551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative trait loci mapping in hybrids between Dent and Flint maize multiparental populations reveals group-specific QTL for silage quality traits with variable pleiotropic effects on yield.
    Seye AI; Bauland C; Giraud H; Mechin V; Reymond M; Charcosset A; Moreau L
    Theor Appl Genet; 2019 May; 132(5):1523-1542. PubMed ID: 30734114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.