These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3515034)

  • 1. [Determining the methotrexate concentration in serum with the fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA)--a comparison with the enzyme immunoassay (EMIT)].
    Liappis N
    Klin Padiatr; 1986; 198(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 3515034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Determination of C-reactive protein in serum using a fluorescence polarization immunoassay--comparison with the method of kinetic nephelometry (KNM)].
    Liappis N; Jäkel A
    Klin Padiatr; 1987; 199(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 3560764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of methotrexate in serum: the aca MTHO immunoassay and HPLC compared.
    Martz W; Oellerich M; Schumann G
    J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1990 Dec; 28(12):951-3. PubMed ID: 2081968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methotrexate measurements in plasma: comparison of enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique, TDx fluorescence polarization immunoassay, and high pressure liquid chromatography.
    Slørdal L; Prytz PS; Pettersen I; Aarbakke J
    Ther Drug Monit; 1986; 8(3):368-72. PubMed ID: 3529519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Serum monitoring of methotrexate (MTX) and 7-hydroxymethotrexate concentrations in patients treated with MTX using high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) and comparison of serum MTX levels between HPLC method and fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA)].
    Sakamoto S; Matsuhisa T; Miyoshi K; Naruse R; Urayama H; Shimokawa T; Okabe K; Toki H; Motoi M; Moriwaki S
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1991 Jun; 18(7):1119-25. PubMed ID: 2053771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An improved application for the enzyme multipled immunoassay technique for caffeine, amikacin, and methotrexate assays on the Dade-Behring Dimension RxL Max clinical chemistry system.
    Mendu DR; Chou PP; Soldin SJ
    Ther Drug Monit; 2007 Oct; 29(5):632-7. PubMed ID: 17898655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Nephelometric inhibition immunoassay (NIIA), a new methodology for the determination of phenobarbital and phenytoin concentration in serum (author's transl)].
    Liappis N
    Klin Padiatr; 1982 Mar; 194(2):88-90. PubMed ID: 7047885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurements of serum gentamicin concentrations by a biological method, fluorescence polarization immunoassay and enzyme multiplied immunoassay.
    Araj GF; Khattar MA; Thulesius O; Pazhoor A
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1986 Oct; 24(10):542-5. PubMed ID: 3536762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a Methotrexate Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay:  Comparison to Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.
    Bouquié R; Grégoire M; Hernando H; Azoulay C; Dailly E; Monteil-Ganière C; Pineau A; Deslandes G; Jolliet P
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2016 Jul; 146(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 27357291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Potential problem with fluorescence polarization immunoassay cross-reactivity to vancomycin degradation product CDP-1: its detection in sera of renally impaired patients.
    Anne L; Hu M; Chan K; Colin L; Gottwald K
    Ther Drug Monit; 1989 Sep; 11(5):585-91. PubMed ID: 2683253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of fluorescence polarization immunoassay and high-performance liquid chromatography methods for assay of teicoplanin: can correlation be improved?
    Davani S; Bérard M; Royer B; Kantelip JP; Muret P
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 2004 Dec; 52(10):584-8. PubMed ID: 15596307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved sensitivity for methotrexate analysis using enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique on the Siemens Viva-E instrument.
    Borgman MP; Hiemer MF; Molinelli AR; Ritchie JC; Jortani SA
    Ther Drug Monit; 2012 Apr; 34(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 22377747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of an enzyme immunochromatography method for carbamazepine: a comparison with enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique, fluorescence polarization immunoassay, and high-performance liquid chromatography.
    Oles KS; Penry JK; Dyer RD
    Ther Drug Monit; 1989; 11(4):471-6. PubMed ID: 2662480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of N-desmethylmethsuximide serum concentrations using enzyme-multiplied and fluorescence polarization immunoassays.
    Miles MV; Howlett CM; Tennison MB; Greenwood RS; Cross RE
    Ther Drug Monit; 1989; 11(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 2658212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of two methods for therapeutic drug monitoring: FPIA (TDx) and Emit].
    Bogovskiĭ BP; Barmanova EIu
    Vopr Med Khim; 1991; 37(3):80-2. PubMed ID: 1949699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of total and free phenytoin in serum by non-isotopic immunoassays and gas chromatography.
    Külpmann WR; Gey S; Beneking M; Kohl B; Oellerich M
    J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1984 Nov; 22(11):773-9. PubMed ID: 6396367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interlaboratory variability in drug assay: a comparison of quality control data with reanalysis of routine patient samples. II: Digoxin. Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Study Group, Italian Society for Clinical Biochemistry.
    Ther Drug Monit; 1991 Mar; 13(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 2053121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of a fluorescent immunoassay with an enzyme immunoassay and a radioimmunoassay for gentamicin.
    Lau AH; Chow-Tung E
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1984 Dec; 41(12):2647-50. PubMed ID: 6393760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. UPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Methotrexate in Human Plasma and Comparison with the Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay.
    Mei S; Zhu L; Li X; Wang J; Jiang X; Chen H; Huo J; Yang L; Lin S; Zhao Z
    Anal Sci; 2017; 33(6):665-670. PubMed ID: 28603183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Determination of theophylline serum level: comparison between a rapid test (enzyme-immuno-chromatography) and conventional fluorescence polarization immunoassay].
    Mallin W; Eber E; Semmelrock HJ; Zach M
    Pneumologie; 1990 Aug; 44(8):967-9. PubMed ID: 2217092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.