These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35151915)

  • 1. [Induction of labour with oral misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol: A before-after study].
    Duvillier C; Gams J; Rousseau A; Rozenberg P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2022 Jun; 50(6):475-480. PubMed ID: 35151915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol 25μg vs. vaginal dinoprostone in induction of labor at term].
    Bagory H; De Broucker C; Tourneux P; Balcaen T; Gondry J; Foulon A; Sergent F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2022 Mar; 50(3):229-235. PubMed ID: 34871786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Induction of labor with misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes beyond thirty-six weeks' gestation.
    Wing DA; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul; 179(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 9704771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Induction of labour in nulliparous women- quick or slow: a cohort study comparing slow-release vaginal insert with low-dose misoprostol oral tablets.
    Eriksson A; Jeppesen S; Krebs L
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Feb; 20(1):79. PubMed ID: 32033600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction.
    Farah LA; Sanchez-Ramos L; Rosa C; Del Valle GO; Gaudier FL; Delke I; Kaunitz AM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 177(2):364-9; discussion 369-71. PubMed ID: 9290452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial.
    Hokkila E; Kruit H; Rahkonen L; Timonen S; Mattila M; Laatio L; Ordén MR; Uotila J; Luukkaala T; Tihtonen K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug; 98(8):1032-1039. PubMed ID: 30771243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy.
    Wang X; Yang A; Ma Q; Li X; Qin L; He T
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Methods for Inducing Labor].
    Girault A
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Jan; 48(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 31669528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Slow-release vaginal insert of misoprostol versus orally administrated solution of misoprostol for the induction of labour in primiparous term pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial.
    Wallström T; Strandberg M; Gemzell-Danielsson K; Pilo C; Jarnbert-Pettersson H; Friman-Mathiasson M; Wiberg-Itzel E
    BJOG; 2019 Aug; 126(9):1148-1155. PubMed ID: 30989788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of 50 microgram oral misoprostol and 25 microgram intravaginal misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a randomized trial.
    Rahman H; Pradhan A; Kharka L; Renjhen P; Kar S; Dutta S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 May; 35(5):408-416. PubMed ID: 23756271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial.
    Pimentel VM; Arabkhazaeli M; Moon JY; Wang A; Kapedani A; Bernstein PS; Tropper PJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):614.e1-614.e8. PubMed ID: 29614276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
    Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Cheng SY; Ming H; Lee JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
    Ghosh A; Lattey KR; Kelly AJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Dec; 12(12):CD006901. PubMed ID: 27918616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison between single dose of 50 microg oral misoprostol and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol for labor induction.
    Paisarntantiwong R; Getgan M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88 Suppl 2():S56-62. PubMed ID: 17722318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical experience with misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a prospective clinical observational study.
    Schmidt M; Neophytou M; Hars O; Freudenberg J; Kühnert M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 299(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30374645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Women's body mass index and oral administration of Misoprostol for induction of labor - A retrospective cohort study.
    Helmig RB; Brogaard L; Hvidman L
    Obes Res Clin Pract; 2021; 15(5):509-511. PubMed ID: 34503935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor.
    Rouzi AA; Alsahly N; Alamoudi R; Almansouri N; Alsinani N; Alkafy S; Rozzah R; Abduljabbar H
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 216(4):405.e1-405.e6. PubMed ID: 27986461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety of misoprostol for near-term and term induction in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies compared to dinoprostone and primary cesarean section: results of a retrospective cohort study.
    Steetskamp J; Bachmann E; Hasenburg A; Battista MJ
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Dec; 302(6):1369-1374. PubMed ID: 32761274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.