196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35153613)
1. Challenges in computational fluid dynamics applications for bone tissue engineering.
Pires T; Dunlop JWC; Fernandes PR; Castro APG
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci; 2022 Jan; 478(2257):20210607. PubMed ID: 35153613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis of customised 3D-printed bone scaffolds with different architectures.
Ntousi O; Roumpi M; Siogkas P; Deligianni D; Fotiadis DI
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38083223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Wall Shear Stress Analysis and Optimization in Tissue Engineering TPMS Scaffolds.
Pires THV; Dunlop JWC; Castro APG; Fernandes PR
Materials (Basel); 2022 Oct; 15(20):. PubMed ID: 36295440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finite element analysis of mechanical behavior, permeability and fluid induced wall shear stress of high porosity scaffolds with gyroid and lattice-based architectures.
Ali D; Sen S
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Nov; 75():262-270. PubMed ID: 28759838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of Additive Manufactured Scaffold Architecture on the Distribution of Surface Strains and Fluid Flow Shear Stresses and Expected Osteochondral Cell Differentiation.
Hendrikson WJ; Deegan AJ; Yang Y; van Blitterswijk CA; Verdonschot N; Moroni L; Rouwkema J
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2017; 5():6. PubMed ID: 28239606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of shear stresses in collagen-glycosaminoglycan and calcium phosphate scaffolds in bone tissue-engineering bioreactors.
Jungreuthmayer C; Donahue SW; Jaasma MJ; Al-Munajjed AA; Zanghellini J; Kelly DJ; O'Brien FJ
Tissue Eng Part A; 2009 May; 15(5):1141-9. PubMed ID: 18831686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of the Effects of Surface Roughness on Permeability and Fluid Flow-Induced Wall Shear Stress in Scaffolds.
Ali D; Sen S
Ann Biomed Eng; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2023-2035. PubMed ID: 30030771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flow rates in perfusion bioreactors to maximise mineralisation in bone tissue engineering in vitro.
Zhao F; van Rietbergen B; Ito K; Hofmann S
J Biomech; 2018 Oct; 79():232-237. PubMed ID: 30149981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Permeability and fluid flow-induced wall shear stress of bone tissue scaffolds: Computational fluid dynamic analysis using Newtonian and non-Newtonian blood flow models.
Ali D; Sen S
Comput Biol Med; 2018 Aug; 99():201-208. PubMed ID: 29957377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Composite polymer-bioceramic scaffolds with drug delivery capability for bone tissue engineering.
Mouriño V; Cattalini JP; Roether JA; Dubey P; Roy I; Boccaccini AR
Expert Opin Drug Deliv; 2013 Oct; 10(10):1353-65. PubMed ID: 23777443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A multiscale computational fluid dynamics approach to simulate the micro-fluidic environment within a tissue engineering scaffold with highly irregular pore geometry.
Zhao F; Melke J; Ito K; van Rietbergen B; Hofmann S
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2019 Dec; 18(6):1965-1977. PubMed ID: 31201621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Geometry-Based Computational Fluid Dynamic Model for Predicting the Biological Behavior of Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.
Omar AM; Hassan MH; Daskalakis E; Ates G; Bright CJ; Xu Z; Powell EJ; Mirihanage W; Bartolo PJDS
J Funct Biomater; 2022 Jul; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 35997442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How getting twisted in scaffold design can promote bone regeneration: A fluid-structure interaction evaluation.
Wang L; Wang J; Chen Q; Li Q; Mendieta JB; Li Z
J Biomech; 2022 Dec; 145():111359. PubMed ID: 36334321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inlet flow rate of perfusion bioreactors affects fluid flow dynamics, but not oxygen concentration in 3D-printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: Computational analysis and experimental validation.
Seddiqi H; Saatchi A; Amoabediny G; Helder MN; Abbasi Ravasjani S; Safari Hajat Aghaei M; Jin J; Zandieh-Doulabi B; Klein-Nulend J
Comput Biol Med; 2020 Sep; 124():103826. PubMed ID: 32798924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of fluid shear stress in bone tissue engineering scaffolds with spherical and cubical pore architectures.
Zhao F; Vaughan TJ; McNamara LM
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2016 Jun; 15(3):561-77. PubMed ID: 26224148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Darcian permeability constant as indicator for shear stresses in regular scaffold systems for tissue engineering.
Vossenberg P; Higuera GA; van Straten G; van Blitterswijk CA; van Boxtel AJ
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2009 Dec; 8(6):499-507. PubMed ID: 19360445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of permeability of regular scaffolds for skeletal tissue engineering: a combined computational and experimental study.
Truscello S; Kerckhofs G; Van Bael S; Pyka G; Schrooten J; Van Oosterwyck H
Acta Biomater; 2012 Apr; 8(4):1648-58. PubMed ID: 22210520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Design and research of bone repair scaffold based on two-way fluid-structure interaction.
Fu M; Wang F; Lin G
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Jun; 204():106055. PubMed ID: 33784546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modeling of porous scaffold deformation induced by medium perfusion.
Podichetty JT; Madihally SV
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2014 May; 102(4):737-48. PubMed ID: 24259467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in scaffold porosity during bone tissue engineering in perfusion bioreactors considerably affect cellular mechanical stimulation for mineralization.
Zhao F; Lacroix D; Ito K; van Rietbergen B; Hofmann S
Bone Rep; 2020 Jun; 12():100265. PubMed ID: 32613033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
