These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3515389)
1. Increased fracture resistance of teeth: comparison of five bonded composite resin systems. Eakle WS Quintessence Int; 1986 Jan; 17(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 3515389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques. Siso SH; Hürmüzlü F; Turgut M; Altundaşar E; Serper A; Er K Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth. Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials. Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Yamada Y; Tsubota Y; Fukushima S Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques. Santos MJ; Bezerra RB J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite. Belli S; Erdemir A; Ozcopur M; Eskitascioglu G Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Increasing the resistance of teeth to fracture: bonded composite resin versus glass ionomer cement. Eakle WS Dent Mater; 1985 Dec; 1(6):229-30. PubMed ID: 3913610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture resistance of teeth with resin-bonded restorations. Stampalia LL; Nicholls JI; Brudvik JS; Jones DW J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Jun; 55(6):694-8. PubMed ID: 3522863 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Sengun A; Cobankara FK; Orucoglu H Dent Traumatol; 2008 Apr; 24(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18352927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture resistance of re-attached coronal fragments--influence of different adhesive materials and bevel preparation. Demarco FF; Fay RM; Pinzon LM; Powers JM Dent Traumatol; 2004 Jun; 20(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 15144447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance of teeth with bonded amalgams. Boyer DB; Roth L Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 8054193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode. Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Molar fracture resistance after adhesive restoration with ceramic inlays or resin-based composites. Bremer BD; Geurtsen W Am J Dent; 2001 Aug; 14(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 11699740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of three direct restorative materials on molar cuspal fracture resistance. Allara FW; Diefenderfer KE; Molinaro JD Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 15478480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]