154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35154862)
1. Deep convolutional neural network-based scatterer density and resolution estimators in optical coherence tomography.
Seesan T; Abd El-Sadek I; Mukherjee P; Zhu L; Oikawa K; Miyazawa A; Shen LT; Matsusaka S; Buranasiri P; Makita S; Yasuno Y
Biomed Opt Express; 2022 Jan; 13(1):168-183. PubMed ID: 35154862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optical-coherence-tomography-based deep-learning scatterer-density estimator using physically accurate noise model.
Seesan T; Mukherjee P; Abd El-Sadek I; Lim Y; Zhu L; Makita S; Yasuno Y
Biomed Opt Express; 2024 May; 15(5):2832-2848. PubMed ID: 38855681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robust Scatterer Number Density Segmentation of Ultrasound Images.
Tehrani AKZ; Rosado-Mendez IM; Rivaz H
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2022 Apr; 69(4):1169-1180. PubMed ID: 35044911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound Scatterer Density Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks and Patch Statistics.
Tehrani AKZ; Amiri M; Rosado-Mendez IM; Hall TJ; Rivaz H
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2021 Aug; 68(8):2697-2706. PubMed ID: 33900913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trade-offs in data acquisition and processing parameters for backscatter and scatterer size estimations.
Liu W; Zagzebski JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010; 57(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 20178900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3-D H-Scan Ultrasound Imaging and Use of a Convolutional Neural Network for Scatterer Size Estimation.
Tai H; Khairalseed M; Hoyt K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Oct; 46(10):2810-2818. PubMed ID: 32653207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deep Network for Scatterer Distribution Estimation for Ultrasound Image Simulation.
Zhang L; Vishnevskiy V; Goksel O
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Dec; 67(12):2553-2564. PubMed ID: 32822295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lateral image reconstruction of optical coherence tomography using one-dimensional deep deconvolution network.
Lee M; Bang H; Lee E; Won Y; Kim K; Park S; Yoo H; Lee S
Lasers Surg Med; 2022 Aug; 54(6):895-906. PubMed ID: 35366377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Pilot Study on Scatterer Density Classification of Ultrasound Images Using Deep Neural Networks.
Tehrani AKZ; Amiri M; Rosado-Mendez IM; Hall TJ; Rivaz H
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():2059-2062. PubMed ID: 33018410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Segmentation of Ultrasound Images based on Scatterer Density using U-Net.
Amiri M; Tehrani AKZ; Rivaz H
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():2063-2066. PubMed ID: 33018411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR-based synthetic CT generation using a deep convolutional neural network method.
Han X
Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1408-1419. PubMed ID: 28192624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mean scatterer spacing estimation using multi-taper coherence.
Rubert N; Varghese T
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jun; 60(6):1061-73. PubMed ID: 25004470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Erratum: Deep convolutional neural networks-based scatterer density and resolution estimators in optical coherence tomography: erratum.
Seesan T; Abd El-Sadek I; Mukherjee P; Zhu L; Oikawa K; Miyazawa A; Shen LT; Matsusaka S; Buranasiri P; Makita S; Yasuno Y
Biomed Opt Express; 2024 Mar; 15(3):1694-1696. PubMed ID: 38495720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image reconstruction of effective Mie scattering parameters of breast tissue in vivo with near-infrared tomography.
Wang X; Pogue BW; Jiang S; Dehghani H; Song X; Srinivasan S; Brooksby BA; Paulsen KD; Kogel C; Poplack SP; Wells WA
J Biomed Opt; 2006; 11(4):041106. PubMed ID: 16965134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional imaging of dye concentration in tissue phantoms by spectroscopic optical coherence tomography.
Støren T; Røyset A; Svaasand LO; Lindmo T
J Biomed Opt; 2005; 10(2):024037. PubMed ID: 15910110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Axial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio in deep-tissue imaging with 1.7-μm high-resolution optical coherence tomography with an ultrabroadband laser source.
Kawagoe H; Yamanaka M; Nishizawa N
J Biomed Opt; 2017 Aug; 22(8):85002. PubMed ID: 28777837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scatterer number density considerations in reference phantom-based attenuation estimation.
Rubert N; Varghese T
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1680-96. PubMed ID: 24726800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated detection of exudative age-related macular degeneration in spectral domain optical coherence tomography using deep learning.
Treder M; Lauermann JL; Eter N
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 256(2):259-265. PubMed ID: 29159541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A deep learning approach for pose estimation from volumetric OCT data.
Gessert N; Schlüter M; Schlaefer A
Med Image Anal; 2018 May; 46():162-179. PubMed ID: 29550582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast- and noise-dependent spatial resolution measurement for deep convolutional neural network-based noise reduction in CT using patient data.
Zhou Z; Gong H; Hsieh S; McCollough CH; Yu L
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2023 Feb; 12463():. PubMed ID: 37197705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
