244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35156992)
21. More target features in visual working memory leads to poorer search guidance: evidence from contralateral delay activity.
Schmidt J; MacNamara A; Proudfit GH; Zelinsky GJ
J Vis; 2014 Mar; 14(3):8. PubMed ID: 24599946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Object features reinstated from episodic memory guide attentional selection.
Kerzel D; Andres MK
Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104158. PubMed ID: 31986352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Enhancement and Suppression Flexibly Guide Attention.
Chang S; Egeth HE
Psychol Sci; 2019 Dec; 30(12):1724-1732. PubMed ID: 31693453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Distractor devaluation requires visual working memory.
Goolsby BA; Shapiro KL; Raymond JE
Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):133-8. PubMed ID: 19145023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Modulation of similarity on the distraction resistance of visual working memory representation.
Sun Y; Wang L; Sun N; Li S
Psychophysiology; 2023 Jan; 60(1):e14153. PubMed ID: 35843992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Multiple representations in visual working memory simultaneously guide attention: The type of memory-matching representation matters.
Fan L; Sun M; Xu M; Li Z; Diao L; Zhang X
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():126-137. PubMed ID: 30471521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Testing the underlying processes leading to learned distractor rejection: Learned oculomotor avoidance.
Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):1964-1981. PubMed ID: 35386017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
Kumada T
Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effects of eccentricity on attentional capture.
van Heusden E; Olivers CNL; Donk M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Feb; 86(2):422-438. PubMed ID: 37258897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.
Houtkamp R; Roelfsema PR
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):423-42. PubMed ID: 16634680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Steady-state Visual Evoked Potentials Reveal Dynamic (Re)allocation of Spatial Attention during Maintenance and Utilization of Visual Working Memory.
Chota S; Bruat AT; Van der Stigchel S; Strauch C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 May; 36(5):800-814. PubMed ID: 38261370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Can salient stimuli really be suppressed?
Chang S; Egeth HE
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):260-269. PubMed ID: 33241528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Irrelevant features of distractors in intervening visual search tasks cause active visual working memory interference - the more difficult the search task, the more interference it causes.
Lively Z; Ng GJP; Buetti S; Lleras A
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2410-2429. PubMed ID: 33977408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Priming effect of individual similarity and ensemble perception in visual search and working memory.
Lin W; Qian J
Psychol Res; 2024 Apr; 88(3):719-734. PubMed ID: 38127115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Separating the effects of visual working memory load and attentional zoom on selective attention.
Lee H; Jeong SK
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 May; 46(5):502-511. PubMed ID: 32162967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Distractor rejection in visual search breaks down with more than a single distractor feature.
Kerzel D; Barras C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 May; 42(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 26594882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The impact of salience and visual working memory on the monitoring and control of saccadic behavior: An eye-tracking and EEG study.
Weaver MD; Hickey C; van Zoest W
Psychophysiology; 2017 Apr; 54(4):544-554. PubMed ID: 28072451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Object-based Encoding in Visual Working Memory: Evidence from Memory-driven Attentional Capture.
Gao Z; Yu S; Zhu C; Shui R; Weng X; Li P; Shen M
Sci Rep; 2016 Mar; 6():22822. PubMed ID: 26956084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The transition from feature to object: Storage unit in visual working memory depends on task difficulty.
Qian J; Zhang K; Liu S; Lei Q
Mem Cognit; 2019 Nov; 47(8):1498-1514. PubMed ID: 31267436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
