These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35156992)

  • 41. Two visual working memory representations simultaneously control attention.
    Chen Y; Du F
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):6107. PubMed ID: 28733668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Pop-out and pop-in: Visual working memory advantages for unique items.
    Rajsic J; Sun SZ; Huxtable L; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1787-1793. PubMed ID: 27025501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Visual mental imagery influences attentional guidance in a visual-search task.
    Moriya J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1127-1142. PubMed ID: 29654532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Feature-based guidance of attention by visual working memory is applied independently of remembered object location.
    Hollingworth A; Bahle B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 31140137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Strategic inhibition of distractors with visual working memory contents after involuntary attention capture.
    Lu J; Tian L; Zhang J; Wang J; Ye C; Liu Q
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):16314. PubMed ID: 29176675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention?
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1450-64. PubMed ID: 24730738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Visual working memory and saliency independently influence the priority for access to visual awareness.
    Ding Y; Paffen CLE; Naber M; Van der Stigchel S
    J Vis; 2019 Sep; 19(11):9. PubMed ID: 31532471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Salience matters: Distractors may, or may not, speed target-absent searches.
    Lawrence RK; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jan; 84(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 34907511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Can you have multiple attentional templates? Large-scale replications of Van Moorselaar, Theeuwes, and Olivers (2014) and Hollingworth and Beck (2016).
    Frătescu M; Van Moorselaar D; Mathôt S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2700-2709. PubMed ID: 31309532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Ventral fronto-parietal contributions to the disruption of visual working memory storage.
    Hakun JG; Ravizza SM
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):783-793. PubMed ID: 26436710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Guidance of attention from visual working memory is feature-based, not object-based: Implications for models of feature binding.
    Thayer DD; Bahle B; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 May; 151(5):1018-1034. PubMed ID: 34735186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Bottom-up perceptual salience and top-down retro-cues concurrently determine state in visual working memory.
    Fan L; Zhang L; Diao L; Xu M; Chen R; Zhang X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Mar; 74(3):459-470. PubMed ID: 32988297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The search for oculomotor inhibition: interactions with working memory.
    Van der Stigchel S
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(6):429-35. PubMed ID: 20178939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The contents of visual working memory reduce uncertainty during visual search.
    Cosman JD; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):996-1002. PubMed ID: 21287315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Looking sharp: Becoming a search template boosts precision and stability in visual working memory.
    Rajsic J; Ouslis NE; Wilson DE; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1643-1651. PubMed ID: 28537011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Competition in saccade target selection reveals attentional guidance by simultaneously active working memory representations.
    Beck VM; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):225-230. PubMed ID: 28134550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Eye movements reveal the contributions of early and late processes of enhancement and suppression to the guidance of visual search.
    Hamblin-Frohman Z; Chang S; Egeth H; Becker SI
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):1913-1924. PubMed ID: 35859034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Distinct prioritization of visual working memory representations for search and for recall.
    Dube B; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1253-1261. PubMed ID: 30644056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Inability to suppress salient distractors predicts low visual working memory capacity.
    Gaspar JM; Christie GJ; Prime DJ; Jolicœur P; McDonald JJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Mar; 113(13):3693-8. PubMed ID: 26903654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.