BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35159077)

  • 1. Diagnostic Performance of Risk of Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA), Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) and Expert Ultrasound Assessment in a Pelvic Mass Classified as Inconclusive by International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules.
    Ngu SF; Chai YK; Choi KM; Leung TW; Li J; Kwok GST; Chu MMY; Tse KY; Cheung VYT; Ngan HYS; Chan KKL
    Cancers (Basel); 2022 Feb; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 35159077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Menopausal status, ultrasound and biomarker tests in combination for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in symptomatic women.
    Davenport C; Rai N; Sharma P; Deeks JJ; Berhane S; Mallett S; Saha P; Champaneria R; Bayliss SE; Snell KI; Sundar S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Jul; 7(7):CD011964. PubMed ID: 35879201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of HE4, CA125, risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) and risk of malignancy index (RMI) as diagnostic tools of epithelial ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass.
    Karlsen MA; Sandhu N; Høgdall C; Christensen IJ; Nedergaard L; Lundvall L; Engelholm SA; Pedersen AT; Hartwell D; Lydolph M; Laursen IA; Høgdall EV
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Nov; 127(2):379-83. PubMed ID: 22835718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Simple Ultrasound Rules by International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) with RMI-1 and RMI-4 (Risk of Malignancy Index) in Preoperative Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses.
    Dewangan S; Gupta S; Chawla I
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2024 Apr; 74(2):158-164. PubMed ID: 38707882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules Risks, ADNEX Model, Subjective Assessment Compared to CA125 and HE4 with ROMA Algorithm in Discriminating between Benign, Borderline and Stage I Malignant Adnexal Lesions.
    Czekierdowski A; Stachowicz N; Smolen A; Łoziński T; Guzik P; Kluz T
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Feb; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 36900029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrasound examination, MRI, or ROMA for discriminating between inconclusive adnexal masses as determined by IOTA Simple Rules: a prospective study.
    Chacon E; Arraiza M; Manzour N; Benito A; Mínguez JÁ; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chiva L; Alcazar JL
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2023 Jun; 33(6):951-956. PubMed ID: 37055169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subjective assessment by ultrasound is superior to the risk of malignancy index (RMI) or the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) in discriminating benign from malignant adnexal masses.
    Van Gorp T; Veldman J; Van Calster B; Cadron I; Leunen K; Amant F; Timmerman D; Vergote I
    Eur J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 48(11):1649-56. PubMed ID: 22226481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of HE4, CA-125, Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) and Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) in the Preoperative Assessment of Patients with Adnexal Mass.
    Al Musalhi K; Al Kindi M; Al Aisary F; Ramadhan F; Al Rawahi T; Al Hatali K; Mula-Abed WA
    Oman Med J; 2016 Sep; 31(5):336-44. PubMed ID: 27602187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk scores to guide referral decisions for people with suspected ovarian cancer in secondary care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Westwood M; Ramaekers B; Lang S; Grimm S; Deshpande S; de Kock S; Armstrong N; Joore M; Kleijnen J
    Health Technol Assess; 2018 Aug; 22(44):1-264. PubMed ID: 30165935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Auekitrungrueng R; Tinnangwattana D; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Wanapirak C; Tongsong T
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 146(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 31206642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Prospective External Validation of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules in the Hands of Level I and II Examiners.
    Knafel A; Banas T; Nocun A; Wiechec M; Jach R; Ludwin A; Kabzinska-Turek M; Pietrus M; Pitynski K
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Oct; 37(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 26126150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison between an ultrasound based prediction model (LR2) and the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) to assess the risk of malignancy in women with an adnexal mass.
    Kaijser J; Van Gorp T; Van Hoorde K; Van Holsbeke C; Sayasneh A; Vergote I; Bourne T; Timmerman D; Van Calster B
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 May; 129(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 23360924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discriminative value of CA-125, HE4, Risk of Malignancy Index II (RMI-II) and Risk of Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA) in the differential diagnosis of pelvic masses: conclusions from a referral Centre in Portugal.
    Melo Â; Veríssimo R; Farinha M; Martins NN; Martins FN
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Nov; 38(8):1140-1145. PubMed ID: 29884096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modification of cutoff values for HE4, CA125, the Risk of Malignancy Index, and the Risk of Malignancy Algorithm for ovarian cancer detection in Jakarta, Indonesia.
    Winarto H; Laihad BJ; Nuranna L
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(5):1949-53. PubMed ID: 24716917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. HE4, CA125, the Risk of Malignancy Algorithm and the Risk of Malignancy Index and complex pelvic masses - a prospective comparison in the pre-operative evaluation of pelvic masses in an Australian population.
    Richards A; Herbst U; Manalang J; Pather S; Saidi S; Tejada-Berges T; Tan K; Williams P; Carter J
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Oct; 55(5):493-7. PubMed ID: 26172511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A multicenter clinical trial validating the performance of HE4, CA125, risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm and risk of malignancy index.
    Lycke M; Kristjansdottir B; Sundfeldt K
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 151(1):159-165. PubMed ID: 30149898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Subjective assessment versus ultrasound models to diagnose ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Meys EM; Kaijser J; Kruitwagen RF; Slangen BF; Van Calster B; Aertgeerts B; Verbakel JY; Timmerman D; Van Gorp T
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 May; 58():17-29. PubMed ID: 26922169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of HE4, CA125, Risk of Malignancy Index and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Index to Detect Ovarian Cancer in Women with Presumed Benign Ovarian Tumours: A Prospective, Multicentre Trial.
    Dochez V; Randet M; Renaudeau C; Dimet J; Le Thuaut A; Winer N; Thubert T; Vaucel E; Caillon H; Ducarme G
    J Clin Med; 2019 Oct; 8(11):. PubMed ID: 31699959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sonographic Assessment of Complex Ultrasound Morphology Adnexal Tumors in Pregnant Women with the Use of IOTA Simple Rules Risk and ADNEX Scoring Systems.
    Czekierdowski A; Stachowicz N; Smoleń A; Kluz T; Łoziński T; Miturski A; Kraczkowski J
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Feb; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33671023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
    Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.