These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35160876)

  • 21. In Vitro Cholesterol Deposition on Daily Disposable Contact Lens Materials.
    Walther H; Subbaraman L; Jones LW
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Jan; 93(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 26583791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dynamic in vitro dehydration patterns of unworn and worn silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    González-Méijome JM; López-Alemany A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2009 Jul; 90(1):250-8. PubMed ID: 19085942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Release of Ciprofloxacin and Moxifloxacin From Daily Disposable Contact Lenses From an In Vitro Eye Model.
    Bajgrowicz M; Phan CM; Subbaraman LN; Jones L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Apr; 56(4):2234-42. PubMed ID: 25766583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of multipurpose solutions on in vivo surface wettability of a silicone hydrogel lens.
    Lau JK; So HT; Chiang TK; Cho P
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Dec; 39(6):461-465. PubMed ID: 27484710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A novel in-vitro method for assessing contact lens surface dewetting: Non-invasive keratograph dry-up time (NIK-DUT).
    Marx S; Sickenberger W
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Dec; 40(6):382-388. PubMed ID: 28847466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bacterial adhesion to worn silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Santos L; Rodrigues D; Lira M; Real Oliveira ME; Oliveira R; Vilar EY; Azeredo J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jul; 85(7):520-5. PubMed ID: 18594343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of surface treatment on hydrophobicity, protein adsorption and microbial colonisation of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Santos L; Rodrigues D; Lira M; Oliveira ME; Oliveira R; Vilar EY; Azeredo J
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Jul; 30(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 17291818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Thirty years of 'quiet eye' with etafilcon A contact lenses.
    Efron N; Brennan NA; Chalmers RL; Jones L; Lau C; Morgan PB; Nichols JJ; Szczotka-Flynn LB; Willcox MD
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Jun; 43(3):285-297. PubMed ID: 32278644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The impact of lipid on contact angle wettability.
    Lorentz H; Rogers R; Jones L
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 84(10):946-53. PubMed ID: 18049360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Novel in vitro method to determine pre-lens tear break-up time of hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Walther H; Subbaraman LN; Jones L
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2019 Apr; 42(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 30442514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of day and night wear on surface properties of silicone hydrogel contact lenses and bacterial adhesion.
    Vermeltfoort PB; Rustema-Abbing M; de Vries J; Bruinsma GM; Busscher HJ; van der Linden ML; Hooymans JM; van der Mei HC
    Cornea; 2006 Jun; 25(5):516-23. PubMed ID: 16783138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Elemental Composition at Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Surfaces.
    Rex J; Knowles T; Zhao X; Lemp J; Maissa C; Perry SS
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Nov; 44 Suppl 2():S221-S226. PubMed ID: 29341977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of lens wear on refractive index of conventional hydrogel and silicone-hydrogel contact lenses: a comparative study.
    Lira M; Santos L; Azeredo J; Yebra-Pimentel E; Real Oliveira ME
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2008 Apr; 31(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 17964212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis to silicone-hydrogel contact lenses.
    Henriques M; Sousa C; Lira M; Elisabete M; Oliveira R; Oliveira R; Azeredo J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 82(6):446-50. PubMed ID: 15976580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bacterial adhesion to conventional hydrogel and new silicone-hydrogel contact lens materials.
    Kodjikian L; Casoli-Bergeron E; Malet F; Janin-Manificat H; Freney J; Burillon C; Colin J; Steghens JP
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 246(2):267-73. PubMed ID: 17987309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bacterial populations on 30-night extended wear silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Keay L; Willcox MD; Sweeney DF; Morris CA; Harmis N; Corrigan K; Holden BA
    CLAO J; 2001 Jan; 27(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 11215603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of tear film components on lysozyme deposition to contact lenses.
    Ng A; Heynen M; Luensmann D; Jones L
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Apr; 89(4):392-400. PubMed ID: 22388670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Composition of incubation solution impacts in vitro protein uptake to silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Jadi S; Heynen M; Luensmann D; Jones L
    Mol Vis; 2012; 18():337-47. PubMed ID: 22355245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vivo dehydration of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Morgan PB; Efron N
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Jul; 29(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 12861112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Impact of Cosmetics on the Physical Dimension and Optical Performance of Contemporary Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses.
    Luensmann D; van Doorn K; May C; Srinivasan S; Jones L
    Eye Contact Lens; 2020 May; 46(3):166-173. PubMed ID: 31232789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.