These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35161930)

  • 21. Cognitive workload evaluation of landmarks and routes using virtual reality.
    Abdurrahman UA; Zheng L; Yeh SC
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268399. PubMed ID: 35580084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An eye tracking investigation of attention mechanism in driving behavior under emotional issues and cognitive load.
    Wang Q; Zhu F; Dang R; Wei X; Han G; Huang J; Hu B
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):16963. PubMed ID: 37807019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Malleable attentional resources theory: a new explanation for the effects of mental underload on performance.
    Young MS; Stanton NA
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(3):365-75. PubMed ID: 12502155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of Acute Physical Fatigue on Gaze Behavior in Expert Badminton Players.
    Loiseau Taupin M; Ruffault A; Slawinski J; Bayle D
    J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2024 Feb; 46(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 38154021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Examination of Driver Visual and Cognitive Responses to Billboard Elicited Passive Distraction Using Eye-Fixation Related Potential.
    Wang Y; Clifford W; Markham C; Deegan C
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Feb; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 33672488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Driver's Cognitive Workload and Driving Performance under Traffic Sign Information Exposure in Complex Environments: A Case Study of the Highways in China.
    Lyu N; Xie L; Wu C; Fu Q; Deng C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 28218696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Time perception as a workload measure in simulated car driving.
    Baldauf D; Burgard E; Wittmann M
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Sep; 40(5):929-35. PubMed ID: 19200943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Saccadic peak velocity sensitivity to variations in mental workload.
    Di Stasi LL; Renner R; Staehr P; Helmert JR; Velichkovsky BM; Cañas JJ; Catena A; Pannasch S
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2010 Apr; 81(4):413-7. PubMed ID: 20377146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of task combination on EEG spectrum modulation for driver workload estimation.
    Lei S; Roetting M
    Hum Factors; 2011 Apr; 53(2):168-79. PubMed ID: 21702334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. CRISP: a computational model of fixation durations in scene viewing.
    Nuthmann A; Smith TJ; Engbert R; Henderson JM
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Apr; 117(2):382-405. PubMed ID: 20438231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cardiovascular and eye activity measures as indices for momentary changes in mental effort during simulated flight.
    De Rivecourt M; Kuperus MN; Post WJ; Mulder LJ
    Ergonomics; 2008 Sep; 51(9):1295-319. PubMed ID: 18802817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Measuring Cognition Load Using Eye-Tracking Parameters Based on Algorithm Description Tools.
    Katona J
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 35161659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. What does germane load mean? An empirical contribution to the cognitive load theory.
    Debue N; van de Leemput C
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1099. PubMed ID: 25324806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Load theory behind the wheel; perceptual and cognitive load effects.
    Murphy G; Greene CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Sep; 71(3):191-202. PubMed ID: 28604027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of visual field defects on eye movements and practical fitness to drive.
    Coeckelbergh TR; Cornelissen FW; Brouwer WH; Kooijman AC
    Vision Res; 2002 Mar; 42(5):669-77. PubMed ID: 11853783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. New insights into feature and conjunction search: I. Evidence from pupil size, eye movements and ageing.
    Porter G; Tales A; Troscianko T; Wilcock G; Haworth J; Leonards U
    Cortex; 2010 May; 46(5):621-36. PubMed ID: 19591979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optic Flow and Tunnel Vision in the Detection Response Task.
    van Winsum W
    Hum Factors; 2019 Sep; 61(6):992-1003. PubMed ID: 30707630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Effects of Cognitive and Visual Workload on Peripheral Detection in the Detection Response Task.
    van Winsum W
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):855-869. PubMed ID: 29791188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Blur, eye movements and performance on a driving visual recognition slide test.
    Lee SS; Wood JM; Black AA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Sep; 35(5):522-9. PubMed ID: 26189873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparing drivers' visual attention at Junctions in Real and Simulated Environments.
    Robbins CJ; Allen HA; Chapman P
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():89-101. PubMed ID: 31280814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.