These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3516207)

  • 1. Biparietal diameter in the Australian aboriginal fetus.
    Watson DS
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Apr; 93(4):339-42. PubMed ID: 3516207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of fetal biparietal diameter during normal pregnancy by ultrasound in Nigerian women.
    Okupe RF; Coker OO; Gbajumo SA
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Jul; 91(7):629-32. PubMed ID: 6743603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of fetal weight by ultrasound measurement. II. Clinical application of a new formula.
    Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P; Andersson NJ
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1982; 61(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 7148404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of fetal weight by ultrasound measurement. I. Development of a new formula.
    Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1982; 61(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 7148403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biparietal diameter of the skull and fetal weight in the second trimester: an allometric relationship.
    Bartolucci L
    Trans Pac Coast Obstet Gynecol Soc; 1974; 42():27-33. PubMed ID: 1209706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of fetal or neonatal weight from the biperietal diameter.
    Pathak DR; Skipper BE; Munsick RA
    J Reprod Med; 1977 Feb; 18(2):87-9. PubMed ID: 833806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of ultrasonic and direct biparietal diameter measurements and placental localization.
    Staisch KJ; Cumberland WG; Hammill H; Geck D
    Biol Res Pregnancy Perinatol; 1984; 5(4):139-42. PubMed ID: 6395911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Critical judgement and evaluation of the biparietal diameter and gestational age].
    Rodríguez N; Behnke E; Farías J; Bernal J; Alarcón H; Lisoni M
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1979; 44(3):94-9. PubMed ID: 262663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intrauterine growth in twin pregnancies: prediction of fetal growth retardation.
    Secher NJ; Kaern J; Hansen PK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jul; 66(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 3892389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of ultrasonic fetal weight prediction in a Chinese population using established charts on abdominal circumference and biparietal diameter.
    Wan CW; Woo JS
    Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Jun; 10(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 6477305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasonic fetal weight prediction: role of head circumference and femur length.
    Weiner CP; Sabbagha RE; Vaisrub N; Socol ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jun; 65(6):812-7. PubMed ID: 3889747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasonic diagnosis of altered fetal growth by use of a normal ultrasonic fetal weight curve.
    Ott WJ; Doyle S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 63(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 6694813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new method for estimation of fetal weight in late pregnancy by ultrasonic scanning.
    Lunt R; Chard T
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1976 Jan; 83(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 766821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasonic fetal size measurements in Brisbane, Australia.
    Schluter PJ; Pritchard G; Gill MA
    Australas Radiol; 2004 Dec; 48(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 15601328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diabetic macrosomia: accuracy of third trimester ultrasound.
    Tamura RK; Sabbagha RE; Depp R; Dooley SL; Socol ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jun; 67(6):828-32. PubMed ID: 3517726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation of fetal age and measurements between 10 and 26 weeks of gestation.
    Hern WM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Jan; 63(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 6691014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biological variation in the biparietal diameter and its bearing on clinical ultrasonography.
    Jordaan HV
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1978 May; 131(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 645783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longitudinal fetal biometry of normal pregnant Melanesian Papua New Guineans to construct standards of reference for Papua New Guinea.
    Amoa AB; Wapi J; Klufio CA
    P N G Med J; 1993 Sep; 36(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 8059548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gestational age in pregnancies conceived after in vitro fertilization: a comparison between age assessed from oocyte retrieval, crown-rump length and biparietal diameter.
    Tunón K; Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P; Von Düring V; Kahn JA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jan; 15(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 10776011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Routine ultrasound screening for the prediction of gestational age.
    Campbell S; Warsof SL; Little D; Cooper DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 May; 65(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 3885105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.