These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Identifying keystone species in the human gut microbiome from metagenomic timeseries using sparse linear regression. Fisher CK; Mehta P PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e102451. PubMed ID: 25054627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MetaMIS: a metagenomic microbial interaction simulator based on microbial community profiles. Shaw GT; Pao YY; Wang D BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):488. PubMed ID: 27887570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Kinetics-based inference of environment-dependent microbial interactions and their dynamic variation. Song H-S; Lee N-R; Kessell AK; McCullough HC; Park S-Y; Zhou K; Lee D-Y mSystems; 2024 May; 9(5):e0130523. PubMed ID: 38682902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Species abundance correlations carry limited information about microbial network interactions. Pinto S; Benincà E; van Nes EH; Scheffer M; Bogaards JA PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Sep; 18(9):e1010491. PubMed ID: 36084152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identifying Keystone Species in the Microbial Community Based on Cross- Sectional Data. Li M; Zhang J; Wu B; Zhou Z; Xu Y Curr Gene Ther; 2018; 18(5):296-306. PubMed ID: 30306866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Community interactions among microbes give rise to host-microbiome mutualisms in an aquatic plant. Laurich JR; Lash E; O'Brien AM; Pogoutse O; Frederickson ME mBio; 2024 Jul; 15(7):e0097224. PubMed ID: 38904411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deciphering microbial interactions and detecting keystone species with co-occurrence networks. Berry D; Widder S Front Microbiol; 2014; 5():219. PubMed ID: 24904535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microbial Species Coexistence Depends on the Host Environment. Deines P; Hammerschmidt K; Bosch TCG mBio; 2020 Jul; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 32694139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mapping the microbial interactome: Statistical and experimental approaches for microbiome network inference. Dohlman AB; Shen X Exp Biol Med (Maywood); 2019 Apr; 244(6):445-458. PubMed ID: 30880449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling Microbial Community Networks: Methods and Tools for Studying Microbial Interactions. Srinivasan S; Jnana A; Murali TS Microb Ecol; 2024 Apr; 87(1):56. PubMed ID: 38587642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling bacteria pairwise interactions in human microbiota by Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics (SINDy) Gutierrez-Vilchis A; Perfecto-Avalos Y; Garcia-Gonzalez A Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2023 Jul; 2023():1-4. PubMed ID: 38083503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recurrent neural networks enable design of multifunctional synthetic human gut microbiome dynamics. Baranwal M; Clark RL; Thompson J; Sun Z; Hero AO; Venturelli OS Elife; 2022 Jun; 11():. PubMed ID: 35736613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Structural identifiability of the generalized Lotka-Volterra model for microbiome studies. Remien CH; Eckwright MJ; Ridenhour BJ R Soc Open Sci; 2021 Jul; 8(7):201378. PubMed ID: 34295510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Signatures of ecological processes in microbial community time series. Faust K; Bauchinger F; Laroche B; de Buyl S; Lahti L; Washburne AD; Gonze D; Widder S Microbiome; 2018 Jun; 6(1):120. PubMed ID: 29954432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An expectation-maximization algorithm enables accurate ecological modeling using longitudinal microbiome sequencing data. Li C; Chng KR; Kwah JS; Av-Shalom TV; Tucker-Kellogg L; Nagarajan N Microbiome; 2019 Aug; 7(1):118. PubMed ID: 31439018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Statistical Methods for Microbiome Compositional Data Network Inference: A Survey. Chen L; Wan H; He Q; He S; Deng M J Comput Biol; 2022 Jul; 29(7):704-723. PubMed ID: 35404093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]