These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

743 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35162325)

  • 1. Direct Comparison of Elastography Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration and B-Mode Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration in Diagnosing Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
    Gheorghiu M; Sparchez Z; Rusu I; Bolboacă SD; Seicean R; Pojoga C; Seicean A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
    Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H
    Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic Evaluation of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Versus Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy.
    Caymaz I; Afandiyeva N
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2023 Nov; 46(11):1596-1602. PubMed ID: 37464106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNA) versus Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in Pancreatic and Non-Pancreatic Lesions.
    Yousri M; Abusinna E; Tahoun N; Okasha HH; El-Habashi AH
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Jun; 23(6):2151-2158. PubMed ID: 35763660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The usefulness of EUS-FNA with contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective study.
    Itonaga M; Kitano M; Kojima F; Hatamaru K; Yamashita Y; Tamura T; Nuta J; Kawaji Y; Shimokawa T; Tanioka K; Murata SI
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Dec; 35(12):2273-2280. PubMed ID: 32529685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Lesions in Chronic Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Abdallah MA; Ahmed K; Taha W; Musa A; Reardon EE; Abdalla AO; Trikudanathan G
    Dig Dis Sci; 2022 Jun; 67(6):2552-2561. PubMed ID: 34086166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast-enhanced harmonic versus standard endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions: a single-center prospective randomized trial.
    Seicean A; Samarghitan A; Bolboacă SD; Pojoga C; Rusu I; Rusu D; Sparchez Z; Gheorghiu M; Al Hajjar N; Seicean R
    Endoscopy; 2020 Dec; 52(12):1084-1090. PubMed ID: 32650346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
    Sur YK; Kim YC; Kim JK; Lee JH; Yoo BM; Kim YB
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Dec; 34(12):2163-9. PubMed ID: 26491091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with or without rapid on-site evaluation for solid pancreatic lesions: five years of experience from a single center.
    Liu Y; Xiong D; Zhao Y; Meng Z; Wu X; Jiang Q; Wang Q; Wu D; Zhang S; Feng Y; Yang A
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2023; 58(10):1185-1193. PubMed ID: 37114616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of inconclusive endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration results in the management and outcome of patients with solid pancreatic masses.
    Sun B; Yang X; Ping B; He Y; Zhang Z
    Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 24837987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
    Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Factors Influencing the Diagnostic Performance of Repeat Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration/Biopsy after the First Inconclusive Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Lesions.
    Cho JH; Kim J; Lee HS; Ryu SJ; Jang SI; Kim EJ; Kang H; Lee SS; Song TJ; Bang S
    Gut Liver; 2024 Jan; 18(1):184-191. PubMed ID: 37317559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Role of Real Time Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Elastography for Targeting EUS-FNA of Suspicious Pancreatic Masses: A Review of the Literature and A Single Center Experience.
    Jafri M; Sachdev AH; Khanna L; Gress FG
    JOP; 2016 Sep; 17(5):516-524. PubMed ID: 28912670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endoscopic ultrasonography-fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses: Do we need the fourth pass? A prospective study.
    Teodorescu C; Gheorghiu M; Zaharie T; Rusu I; Pojoga C; Bolboacă SD; Seicean R; Petrusel L; Seicean A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Mar; 49(3):395-403. PubMed ID: 33220130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic ability and factors affecting accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid lesions: Japanese large single center experience.
    Haba S; Yamao K; Bhatia V; Mizuno N; Hara K; Hijioka S; Imaoka H; Niwa Y; Tajika M; Kondo S; Tanaka T; Shimizu Y; Yatabe Y; Hosoda W; Kawakami H; Sakamoto N
    J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):973-81. PubMed ID: 23090002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.
    Best LM; Rawji V; Pereira SP; Davidson BR; Gurusamy KS
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 4(4):CD010213. PubMed ID: 28415140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Pancreatic Lesions With Endoscopic Ultrasound and Fine Needle Aspiration.
    Luk Y; She WH; Chow FCL; Ma KW; Tsang SHY; Dai WC; Cheung TT; Lo CM
    Surg Innov; 2020 Oct; 27(5):431-438. PubMed ID: 32476606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) elastography-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) versus conventional EUS FNAC for solid pancreatic lesions: A pilot randomized trial.
    Nayak HK; Rai A; Gupta S; Prakash JH; Patra S; Panigrahi C; Patel RK; Pattnaik B; Kar M; Panigrahi MK; Samal SC
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39230660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of histological examination on the diagnosis of pancreatic mass using endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration.
    Choi SJ; Lee JM; Lee KW; Choi HS; Kim ES; Keum B; Yoon JH; Jeen YT; Chun HJ; Lee HS; Choi HS
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2021 Sep; 30(9):885-891. PubMed ID: 34410046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.