These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35162340)

  • 21. Stiffness adaptations in shod running.
    Divert C; Baur H; Mornieux G; Mayer F; Belli A
    J Appl Biomech; 2005 Nov; 21(4):311-21. PubMed ID: 16498177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sensory Perception of Varied Shoe Masses in Running.
    Keshvari B; Alevras S; Senner V
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2023; 113(1):. PubMed ID: 36905625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Motion-control shoes help maintaining low loading rate levels during fatiguing running in pronated female runners.
    Jafarnezhadgero AA; Sorkhe E; Oliveira AS
    Gait Posture; 2019 Sep; 73():65-70. PubMed ID: 31299505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of footwear and strike type on running economy.
    Perl DP; Daoud AI; Lieberman DE
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Jul; 44(7):1335-43. PubMed ID: 22217565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Systematic Review of the Role of Footwear Constructions in Running Biomechanics: Implications for Running-Related Injury and Performance.
    Sun X; Lam WK; Zhang X; Wang J; Fu W
    J Sports Sci Med; 2020 Mar; 19(1):20-37. PubMed ID: 32132824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Running Economy While Running in Shoes Categorized as Maximal Cushioning.
    Mercer MA; Stone TM; Young JC; Mercer JA
    Int J Exerc Sci; 2018; 11(2):1031-1040. PubMed ID: 30338016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ground reaction force differences between running shoes, racing flats, and distance spikes in runners.
    Logan S; Hunter I; J Ty Hopkins JT; Feland JB; Parcell AC
    J Sports Sci Med; 2010; 9(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 24149399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The morphology of foot soft tissues is associated with running shoe type in healthy recreational runners.
    Zhang X; Delabastita T; Lissens J; De Beenhouwer F; Vanwanseele B
    J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Jul; 21(7):686-690. PubMed ID: 29239782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Changes in plantar loading based on shoe type and sex during a jump-landing task.
    Debiasio JC; Russell ME; Butler RJ; Nunley JA; Queen RM
    J Athl Train; 2013; 48(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 24067149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Test-retest reliability of physiological parameters in elite junior distance runners following allometric scaling.
    Blagrove RC; Howatson G; Hayes PR
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2017 Nov; 17(10):1231-1240. PubMed ID: 28829688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A 6-Week Transition to Maximal Running Shoes Does Not Change Running Biomechanics.
    Hannigan JJ; Pollard CD
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Mar; 47(4):968-973. PubMed ID: 30870034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Longitudinal bending stiffness does not affect running economy in Nike Vaporfly Shoes.
    Healey LA; Hoogkamer W
    J Sport Health Sci; 2022 May; 11(3):285-292. PubMed ID: 34280602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The energetics of running and running shoes.
    Shorten MR
    J Biomech; 1993; 26 Suppl 1():41-51. PubMed ID: 8505351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of the Nike ZoomX Vaporfly Next% 2 shoe on long-interval training performance, kinematics, neuromuscular parameters, running power and fatigue.
    Castellanos-Salamanca M; Rodrigo-Carranza V; Rodríguez-Barbero S; González-Ravé JM; Santos-Concejero J; González-Mohíno F
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2023 Jul; 23(7):1315-1323. PubMed ID: 36680410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Shoe Cushioning Influences the Running Injury Risk According to Body Mass: A Randomized Controlled Trial Involving 848 Recreational Runners.
    Malisoux L; Delattre N; Urhausen A; Theisen D
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Feb; 48(2):473-480. PubMed ID: 31877062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Increasing Shoe Longitudinal Bending Stiffness Is Not Beneficial to Reduce Energy Cost During Graded Running.
    Perrin TP; Rossi J; Kerhervé HA; Millet GY
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2023 Feb; 18(2):209-212. PubMed ID: 36634310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A systematic review of the effect of running shoes on running economy, performance and biomechanics: analysis by brand and model.
    Ruiz-Alias SA; Molina-Molina A; Soto-Hermoso VM; García-Pinillos F
    Sports Biomech; 2023 Mar; 22(3):388-409. PubMed ID: 35748066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of nail softness and stiffness with distance running shoes on ground reaction forces and vertical loading rates in male elite long-distance runners with pronated feet.
    Jafarnezhadgero AA; Fakhri E; Granacher U
    BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil; 2021 Oct; 13(1):120. PubMed ID: 34627372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mechanical and physiological examination of barefoot and shod conditions in female runners.
    Paulson S; Braun WA
    Int J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 35(9):789-93. PubMed ID: 24577857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Barefoot versus shoe running: from the past to the present.
    Kaplan Y
    Phys Sportsmed; 2014 Feb; 42(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 24565819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.