321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35162669)
1. Evaluating the Performance of Low-Cost Air Quality Monitors in Dallas, Texas.
Khreis H; Johnson J; Jack K; Dadashova B; Park ES
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance evaluation of ozone and particulate matter sensors.
DeWitt HL; Crow WL; Flowers B
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 Mar; 70(3):292-306. PubMed ID: 31961265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two step calibration method for ozone low-cost sensor: Field experiences with the UrbanSense DCUs.
Sá JP; Chojer H; Branco PTBS; Alvim-Ferraz MCM; Martins FG; Sousa SIV
J Environ Manage; 2023 Feb; 328():116910. PubMed ID: 36495826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low-cost sensors as an alternative for long-term air quality monitoring.
Liu X; Jayaratne R; Thai P; Kuhn T; Zing I; Christensen B; Lamont R; Dunbabin M; Zhu S; Gao J; Wainwright D; Neale D; Kan R; Kirkwood J; Morawska L
Environ Res; 2020 Jun; 185():109438. PubMed ID: 32276167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and field validation of a community-engaged particulate matter air quality monitoring network in Imperial, California, USA.
Carvlin GN; Lugo H; Olmedo L; Bejarano E; Wilkie A; Meltzer D; Wong M; King G; Northcross A; Jerrett M; English PB; Hammond D; Seto E
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Dec; 67(12):1342-1352. PubMed ID: 28829718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysing the performance of low-cost air quality sensors, their drivers, relative benefits and calibration in cities-a case study in Sheffield.
Munir S; Mayfield M; Coca D; Jubb SA; Osammor O
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Jan; 191(2):94. PubMed ID: 30671683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The London low emission zone baseline study.
Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deployment, Calibration, and Cross-Validation of Low-Cost Electrochemical Sensors for Carbon Monoxide, Nitrogen Oxides, and Ozone for an Epidemiological Study.
Zuidema C; Schumacher CS; Austin E; Carvlin G; Larson TV; Spalt EW; Zusman M; Gassett AJ; Seto E; Kaufman JD; Sheppard L
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jun; 21(12):. PubMed ID: 34205429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A land use regression model using machine learning and locally developed low cost particulate matter sensors in Uganda.
Coker ES; Amegah AK; Mwebaze E; Ssematimba J; Bainomugisha E
Environ Res; 2021 Aug; 199():111352. PubMed ID: 34043968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance assessment of NOVA SDS011 low-cost PM sensor in various microenvironments.
Božilov A; Tasić V; Živković N; Lazović I; Blagojević M; Mišić N; Topalović D
Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Jul; 194(9):595. PubMed ID: 35857115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving accuracy of air pollution exposure measurements: Statistical correction of a municipal low-cost airborne particulate matter sensor network.
Considine EM; Reid CE; Ogletree MR; Dye T
Environ Pollut; 2021 Jan; 268(Pt B):115833. PubMed ID: 33120139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Five Years of Accurate PM
Robinson DL; Goodman N; Vardoulakis S
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Nov; 20(23):. PubMed ID: 38063557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of Air Quality Boxes Based on Low-Cost Sensor Technology for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring.
Gäbel P; Koller C; Hertig E
Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(10):. PubMed ID: 35632239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Calibration of low-cost particulate matter sensors: Model development for a multi-city epidemiological study.
Zusman M; Schumacher CS; Gassett AJ; Spalt EW; Austin E; Larson TV; Carvlin G; Seto E; Kaufman JD; Sheppard L
Environ Int; 2020 Jan; 134():105329. PubMed ID: 31783241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a multiple regression model to calibrate a low-cost sensor considering reference measurements and meteorological parameters.
Romero Y; Velásquez RMA; Noel J
Environ Monit Assess; 2020 Jul; 192(8):498. PubMed ID: 32648052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Source identification with high-temporal resolution data from low-cost sensors using bivariate polar plots in urban areas of Ghana.
Hodoli CG; Coulon F; Mead MI
Environ Pollut; 2023 Jan; 317():120448. PubMed ID: 36457223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calibration methodology of low-cost sensors for high-quality monitoring of fine particulate matter.
Aix ML; Schmitz S; Bicout DJ
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Sep; 889():164063. PubMed ID: 37201842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a calibration chamber to evaluate the performance of low-cost particulate matter sensors.
Sayahi T; Kaufman D; Becnel T; Kaur K; Butterfield AE; Collingwood S; Zhang Y; Gaillardon PE; Kelly KE
Environ Pollut; 2019 Dec; 255(Pt 1):113131. PubMed ID: 31521992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
