These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35162729)

  • 1. The Reliability and Medical Students' Appreciation of Certainty-Based Marking.
    Smrkolj Š; Bančov E; Smrkolj V
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Certainty rating in pre-and post-tests of study modules in an online clinical pharmacy course - A pilot study to evaluate teaching and learning.
    Luetsch K; Burrows J
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):267. PubMed ID: 27741945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of certainty-based marking in a second-year medical student cohort: a pilot study.
    Schoendorfer N; Emmett D
    Adv Med Educ Pract; 2012; 3():139-43. PubMed ID: 23762012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing single-best-answer and very-short-answer questions for the assessment of applied medical knowledge in 20 UK medical schools: Cross-sectional study.
    Sam AH; Westacott R; Gurnell M; Wilson R; Meeran K; Brown C
    BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e032550. PubMed ID: 31558462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patients don't come with multiple choice options: essay-based assessment in UME.
    Bird JB; Olvet DM; Willey JM; Brenner J
    Med Educ Online; 2019 Dec; 24(1):1649959. PubMed ID: 31438809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The 'unskilled and unaware' effect is linear in a real-world setting.
    Sawdon M; Finn G
    J Anat; 2014 Mar; 224(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 23781887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Certainty-based marking in a formative assessment improves student course appreciation but not summative examination scores.
    Hendriks WJAJ; Bakker N; Pluk H; de Brouwer A; Wieringa B; Cambi A; Zegers M; Wansink DG; Leunissen R; Klaren PHM
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 May; 19(1):178. PubMed ID: 31151456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Certainty-Based Marking on Multiple-Choice Items: Psychometrics Meets Decision Theory.
    Wu Q; Vanerum M; Agten A; Christiansen A; Vandenabeele F; Rigo JM; Janssen R
    Psychometrika; 2021 Jun; 86(2):518-543. PubMed ID: 33928520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Usable knowledge, hazardous ignorance - beyond the percentage correct score.
    Dory V; Degryse J; Roex A; Vanpee D
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(5):375-80. PubMed ID: 20423255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Formative and Summative Assessment in Veterinary Pathology and Other Courses at a Mexican Veterinary College.
    Valero G; Cárdenas P
    J Vet Med Educ; 2017; 44(2):331-337. PubMed ID: 27779920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing musculoskeletal examination skills and diagnostic reasoning of 4th year medical students using a novel objective structured clinical exam.
    Stansfield RB; Diponio L; Craig C; Zeller J; Chadd E; Miller J; Monrad S
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):268. PubMed ID: 27741946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sure, or unsure? Measuring students' confidence and the potential impact on patient safety in multiple-choice questions.
    Rangel RH; Möller L; Sitter H; Stibane T; Strzelczyk A
    Med Teach; 2017 Nov; 39(11):1189-1194. PubMed ID: 28799435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of a flipped classroom in ophthalmology courses for nursing, dental and medical students: A quasi-experimental study using a mixed-methods approach.
    Zhu L; Lian Z; Engström M
    Nurse Educ Today; 2020 Feb; 85():104262. PubMed ID: 31759243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of three evidence-based practice learning assessment methods in dental curricula.
    Al-Ansari AA; El Tantawi MM
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Feb; 79(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 25640619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Students' perceptions of educational environment: a comparison of academic achievers and under-achievers at kasturba medical college, India.
    Mayya S; Roff S
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2004 Nov; 17(3):280-91. PubMed ID: 15848815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using confidence-based marking in a laboratory setting: A tool for student self-assessment and learning.
    Barr DA; Burke JR
    J Chiropr Educ; 2013; 27(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 23519005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using MCQ response certainty to determine how aspects of self-monitoring develop through a medical course.
    Tweed M; Willink R; Wilkinson TJ
    Med Educ; 2024 May; 58(5):535-543. PubMed ID: 37932950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors influencing medical students' self-assessment of examination performance accuracy: A United Arab Emirates study.
    Shaban S; Aburawi EH; Elzubeir K; Elango S; El-Zubeir M
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2016; 29(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 27549643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Post-exam feedback with question rationales improves re-test performance of medical students on a multiple-choice exam.
    Levant B; Zückert W; Paolo A
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Dec; 23(5):995-1003. PubMed ID: 30043313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. OSCE as a tool for evaluation of practical semiology in comparison to MCQ & oral examination.
    Dadgar SR; Saleh A; Bahador H; Baradaran HR
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2008 Sep; 58(9):506-7. PubMed ID: 18846801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.