These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35162903)

  • 1. The Effects of Dynamic Complexity on Drivers' Secondary Task Scanning Behavior under a Car-Following Scenario.
    Wang L; Li H; Guo M; Chen Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the relationship between occlusion times and in-car glance durations in simulated driving.
    Grahn H; Kujala T; Taipalus T; Lee J; Lee JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Mar; 182():106955. PubMed ID: 36630858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?
    Muhrer E; Reinprecht K; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):698-708. PubMed ID: 23156616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of mobile phone use on car-following behaviour of young drivers.
    Saifuzzaman M; Haque MM; Zheng Z; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Sep; 82():10-9. PubMed ID: 26009990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Longitudinal control behaviour: Analysis and modelling based on experimental surveys in Italy and the UK.
    Pariota L; Bifulco GN; Galante F; Montella A; Brackstone M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Apr; 89():74-87. PubMed ID: 26828955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrated driving risk surrogate model and car-following behavior for freeway risk assessment.
    Wu R; Li L; Shi H; Rui Y; Ngoduy D; Ran B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jun; 201():107571. PubMed ID: 38608507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of peripheral transverse line markings on drivers' speed and headway choice and crash risk in car-following: A naturalistic observation study.
    Ding N; Zhu S; Jiao N; Liu B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105701. PubMed ID: 32823033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing car drivers' and motorcyclists' opinions about junction crashes.
    Robbins CJ; Allen HA; Chapman P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():304-317. PubMed ID: 29753219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Traffic calming along rural highways crossing small urban communities: driving simulator experiment.
    Galante F; Mauriello F; Montella A; Pernetti M; Aria M; D'Ambrosio A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1585-94. PubMed ID: 20728607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of car driver responses to avoid car-to-cyclist perpendicular collisions based on drive recorder data and driving simulator experiments.
    Zhao Y; Miyahara T; Mizuno K; Ito D; Han Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105862. PubMed ID: 33276185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk to workers or vehicle damage: What makes drivers slow down in work zones?
    Debnath AK; Haworth N; Blackman R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(2):177-181. PubMed ID: 33566712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of environmental noise on drivers' cognitive abilities: A case study on in-vehicle voice interaction interfaces.
    Jin T; Liu X; Chen C; Xia Y; Liu X; Lv M; Li L
    Appl Ergon; 2024 May; 117():104247. PubMed ID: 38335864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mobile Phone Use in a Car-Following Situation: Impact on Time Headway and Effectiveness of Driver's Rear-End Risk Compensation Behavior via a Driving Simulator Study.
    Chen Y; Fu R; Xu Q; Yuan W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Feb; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 32092914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examination of drivers' cell phone use behavior at intersections by using naturalistic driving data.
    Xiong H; Bao S; Sayer J; Kato K
    J Safety Res; 2015 Sep; 54():89-93. PubMed ID: 26403907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing drivers' visual attention at Junctions in Real and Simulated Environments.
    Robbins CJ; Allen HA; Chapman P
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():89-101. PubMed ID: 31280814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling Car-Following Behaviors and Driving Styles with Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning.
    Zhou Y; Fu R; Wang C; Zhang R
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Sep; 20(18):. PubMed ID: 32899773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Driver Behavior During Overtaking Maneuvers from the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Chen R; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S176-81. PubMed ID: 26436229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating the effects of driving environment and driver characteristics on drivers' compliance with speed limits.
    Yadav AK; Velaga NR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(3):201-206. PubMed ID: 33688753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Driving responses of older and younger drivers in a driving simulator.
    Fildes B; Charlton J; Muir C; Koppel S
    Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2007; 51():559-72. PubMed ID: 18184513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Judging arrival times of incoming traffic vehicles is not a prerequisite for safely crossing an intersection: Differential effects of vehicle size and type in passive judgment and active driving tasks.
    Mathieu J; Bootsma RJ; Berthelon C; Montagne G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Feb; 173():1-12. PubMed ID: 27978421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.