These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3516337)

  • 1. Posts in molars. Must we?
    Gelfand M
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1986 May; 52(5):371-2. PubMed ID: 3516337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro comparison of dowel and core techniques for endodontically treated molars.
    Plasmans PJ; Visseren LG; Vrijhoef MM; Kayser AF
    J Endod; 1986 Sep; 12(9):382-7. PubMed ID: 3531376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro comparison of two dowel and core techniques for endodontically treated molars.
    Kern SB; von Fraunhofer JA; Mueninghoff LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Apr; 51(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 6374108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post-and-core systems: an in vitro study.
    Butz F; Lennon AM; Heydecke G; Strub JR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 11842907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the seal of amalgam cores with cemented dowels: a comparative in vitro radioactive tracer study.
    Metzger Z; Schaham G; Abramovitz I; Dotan M; Ben-Amar A
    J Endod; 2001 Apr; 27(4):288-91. PubMed ID: 11485270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture resistance and failure patterns of endodontically treated mandibular molars with and without glass fiber post in combination with a zirconia-ceramic crown.
    Salameh Z; Ounsi HF; Aboushelib MN; Sadig W; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Jul; 36(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 18479800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the survival of fibre posts cemented with two different composite resin systems.
    Mehta SB; Millar BJ
    Br Dent J; 2008 Dec; 205(11):E23. PubMed ID: 19029918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro comparison of retention between a hollow post and core and a solid post and core.
    Mosen PJ; Nicholls JI; Van Hassel HJ
    J Endod; 1984 Mar; 10(3):91-5. PubMed ID: 6371177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of various technics used in the reconstruction of dowels].
    Pamplona Guisa JM; Ramirez Delgado RH
    Odontol Mexico; 1983 May; 1(2):7-17. PubMed ID: 6382087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vitro comparison of retention between a hollow post and core and a custom hollow post and core.
    Halle EB; Nicholls JI; Van Hassel HJ
    J Endod; 1984 Mar; 10(3):96-100. PubMed ID: 6371178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Prepared metal posts and composite resin cores].
    Tanaka K
    DE J Dent Eng; 1985; (72):6-9. PubMed ID: 3926392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Amalgam post and core: a simplified technique for endodontically-treated posterior teeth.
    Brown JW; McComb D
    Ont Dent; 1987 May; 64(5):15-7. PubMed ID: 3306539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A hollow post and core system--evaluation of reinstrumentation and reobturation.
    Ludington JR; Nicholls JI; Van Hassel HJ
    J Endod; 1984 Apr; 10(4):140-5. PubMed ID: 6374006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of customized fiber posts for the aesthetic treatment of severely compromised teeth: a case report.
    Savi A; Manfredi M; Tamani M; Fazzi M; Pizzi S
    Dent Traumatol; 2008 Dec; 24(6):671-5. PubMed ID: 19021661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Requirements in vitro for reconstruction of endodontically-treated molars].
    Plasmans PJ; Welle PR; Engel-Kappe FU; Pohlen H
    Phillip J; 1989 Jun; 6(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 2560575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Posts for posteriors: an indirect casting technique.
    Walker RT; Crabbe JP
    Quintessence Dent Technol; 1985 Jan; 9(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 3883433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative evaluation of three post and core techniques.
    Hoag EP; Dwyer TG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1982 Feb; 47(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 7035654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of root filled teeth restored with or without post-and-core systems in a specialist practice setting.
    Salvi GE; Siegrist Guldener BE; Amstad T; Joss A; Lang NP
    Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 17305698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Build-up using composite resins in the root canal therapy of molars and premolars].
    Søbye PE
    Tidsskr Tandlaeger; 1981 Dec; 1(3):30-2. PubMed ID: 6750839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparative study of the retentive strength of 6 root posts].
    Charpentier J
    Cah Prothese; 1983 Sep; 11(43):29-38. PubMed ID: 6380661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.