These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35164484)

  • 1. Glottic views using a Miller size 0 blade are superior to those from a Macintosh size 0 blade in neonates: a randomized trial.
    Saracoglu A; Lerman J; Kafali H; Canaz H; T Saracoglu K
    Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther; 2021; 53(3):246-251. PubMed ID: 35164484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the laryngoscopy views with the size 1 Miller and Macintosh laryngoscope blades lifting the epiglottis or the base of the tongue in infants and children <2 yr of age.
    Passi Y; Sathyamoorthy M; Lerman J; Heard C; Marino M
    Br J Anaesth; 2014 Nov; 113(5):869-74. PubMed ID: 25062740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized trial of the glottic views with the classic Miller, Wis-Hipple and C-MAC (videolaryngoscope and direct views) straight size 1 blades in young children.
    Elattar H; Abdel-Rahman I; Ibrahim M; Kocz R; Raczka M; Kumar A; Senbruna B; Gensler T; Lerman J
    J Clin Anesth; 2020 Mar; 60():57-61. PubMed ID: 31450175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Miller Laryngoscope and the McGrath-MAC Video Laryngoscope in Direct Visualization of the Glottic Opening.
    Küçükosman G; Bollucuoğlu K; Ava M; Ayoğlu H
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Dec; 60(1):. PubMed ID: 38256323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does the Miller blade truly provide a better laryngoscopic view and intubating conditions than the Macintosh blade in small children?
    Varghese E; Kundu R
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Aug; 24(8):825-9. PubMed ID: 24690084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative efficacy of C-MAC
    Gupta A; Singh P; Gupta N; Kumar Malhotra R; Girdhar KK
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2021 Oct; 31(10):1089-1096. PubMed ID: 34153141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. View of the larynx obtained using the Miller blade and paraglossal approach, compared to that with the Macintosh blade.
    Achen B; Terblanche OC; Finucane BT
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2008 Sep; 36(5):717-21. PubMed ID: 18853593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Cardiff paediatric laryngoscope blade: a comparison with the Miller size 1 and Macintosh size 2 laryngoscope blades.
    Jones RM; Jones PL; Gildersleve CD; Hall JE; Harding LJ; Chawathe MS
    Anaesthesia; 2004 Oct; 59(10):1016-9. PubMed ID: 15488063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Importance of Median Glossoepiglottic Fold Engagement on Laryngeal View and Tracheal Intubation Success in Children.
    Dean P; Edmunds K; Shah A; Frey M; Zhang Y; Thomas P; Boyd S; Geis G; Kerrey BT
    Ann Emerg Med; 2023 Jun; 81(6):658-666. PubMed ID: 36797132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of the Macintosh curved blade size on direct laryngoscopic view in edentulous patients.
    Kim H; Chang JE; Han SH; Lee JM; Yoon S; Hwang JY
    Am J Emerg Med; 2018 Jan; 36(1):120-123. PubMed ID: 28974373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the Laryngoscopic View using Macintosh and Miller Blades in Children Less than Four Years Old.
    Soltani AE; Maleki A; Espahbodi E; Goudarzi M; Ariana P; Takzare A
    J Med Life; 2020; 13(3):431-434. PubMed ID: 33072220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the STORZ video laryngoscope and standard direct laryngoscopy for intubation in the Pediatric airway--a randomized clinical trial.
    Vlatten A; Aucoin S; Litz S; Macmanus B; Soder C
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2009 Nov; 19(11):1102-7. PubMed ID: 19708910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Craniocervical motion during direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation with the Macintosh and Miller blades: an in vivo cinefluoroscopic study.
    LeGrand SA; Hindman BJ; Dexter F; Weeks JB; Todd MM
    Anesthesiology; 2007 Dec; 107(6):884-91. PubMed ID: 18043056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope size 2 Macintosh blade with size 2 C-MAC D-Blade for laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in children with simulated cervical spine injury: A prospective randomized crossover study.
    Sinha R; Ray BR; Sharma A; Pandey RK; Punj J; Darlong V; Trikha A
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2019; 35(4):509-514. PubMed ID: 31920236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Straight video blades are advantageous than curved blades in simulated pediatric difficult intubation.
    Saracoglu KT; Eti Z; Kavas AD; Umuroglu T
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Mar; 24(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 24215652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Direct laryngoscopy or C-MAC video laryngoscopy? Routine tracheal intubation in patients undergoing ENT surgery].
    Meininger D; Strouhal U; Weber CF; Fogl D; Holzer L; Zacharowski K; Byhahn C
    Anaesthesist; 2010 Sep; 59(9):806-11. PubMed ID: 20703441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comparison of Miller Straight Blade and Macintosh Blade Laryngoscopes for Intubation in Morbidly Obese Patients.
    Ratajczyk P; Kluj P; Szmyd B; Resch J; Hogendorf P; Durczynski A; Gaszynski T
    J Clin Med; 2024 Jan; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 38337375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of two Macintosh laryngoscope blades in 300 patients.
    Asai T; Matsumoto S; Fujise K; Johmura S; Shingu K
    Br J Anaesth; 2003 Apr; 90(4):457-60. PubMed ID: 12644417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The McCoy straight blade does not improve laryngoscopy and intubation in normal infants.
    Iohom G; Franklin R; Casey W; Lyons B
    Can J Anaesth; 2004 Feb; 51(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 14766692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Partial vs full glottic view with CMAC
    Cheong CC; Ong SY; Lim SM; Wan A WZ; Mansor M; Chaw SH
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2023 Feb; 20(2):151-160. PubMed ID: 36715659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.