These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35165351)
1. Reconciling human health with the environment while struggling against the COVID-19 pandemic through improved face mask eco-design. Morone P; Yilan G; Imbert E; Becchetti L Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2445. PubMed ID: 35165351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Face masks. Technical, technological and functional characteristics and hygienic-sanitary aspects related to the use of filtering mask in the community. Santarsiero A; Ciambelli P; Donsì G; Quadrini F; Briancesco R; D'Alessandro D; Fara GM Ann Ig; 2020; 32(5):472-520. PubMed ID: 32744582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A laboratory-based study examining the properties of silk fabric to evaluate its potential as a protective barrier for personal protective equipment and as a functional material for face coverings during the COVID-19 pandemic. Parlin AF; Stratton SM; Culley TM; Guerra PA PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0239531. PubMed ID: 32946526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Masks as personal protective equipment in the COVID-19 pandemic: How, when and which should be used]. Aranaz Andrés JM; Gea Velázquez de Castro MT; Vicente-Guijarro J; Beltrán Peribáñez J; García Haro M; Valencia-Martín JL; Bischofberger Valdés C; ; J Healthc Qual Res; 2020; 35(4):245-252. PubMed ID: 32680724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. COVID-19: mask efficacy is dependent on both fabric and fit. Darby S; Chulliyallipalil K; Przyjalgowski M; McGowan P; Jeffers S; Giltinan A; Lewis L; Smith N; Sleator RD Future Microbiol; 2021 Jan; 16():5-11. PubMed ID: 33350330 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. One size fits all?: A simulation framework for face-mask fit on population-based faces. Solano T; Mittal R; Shoele K PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252143. PubMed ID: 34133436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Environmental implication of personal protection equipment in the pandemic era: LCA comparison of face masks typologies. Rodríguez NB; Formentini G; Favi C; Marconi M Procedia CIRP; 2021; 98():306-311. PubMed ID: 33723504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reusable Face Masks as Alternative for Disposable Medical Masks: Factors that Affect their Wear-Comfort. Lee KP; Yip J; Kan CW; Chiou JC; Yung KF Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(18):. PubMed ID: 32932918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways. Eckelman M; Mosher M; Gonzalez A; Sherman J Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 22492190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cloth masks versus medical masks for COVID-19 protection. Szarpak L; Smereka J; Filipiak KJ; Ladny JR; Jaguszewski M Cardiol J; 2020; 27(2):218-219. PubMed ID: 32285928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Use, reuse, and waste management of single-use products associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Rodriguez Morris MI; Kontar W; Hicks AL Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2024 Sep; 20(5):1736-1746. PubMed ID: 38353376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Protective Face Masks: Current Status and Future Trends. Tuñón-Molina A; Takayama K; Redwan EM; Uversky VN; Andrés J; Serrano-Aroca Á ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2021 Dec; 13(48):56725-56751. PubMed ID: 34797624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Validation of surgical masks during COVID19 emergency: activities at the University of Napoli Federico II]. D'Anna A; Di Natale F; De Falco G; Di Maio E; Tammaro D; Quaglia F; Ungaro F; Cassiano C; Salvatore P; Colicchio R; Scaglione E; Pagliuca C; Fontana L; Iavicoli I G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2020 Jun; 42(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 32614536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Environmental risks of polymer materials from disposable face masks linked to the COVID-19 pandemic. Du H; Huang S; Wang J Sci Total Environ; 2022 Apr; 815():152980. PubMed ID: 35007580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Selection of homemade mask materials for preventing transmission of COVID-19: A laboratory study. Wang D; You Y; Zhou X; Zong Z; Huang H; Zhang H; Yong X; Cheng Y; Yang L; Guo Q; Long Y; Liu Y; Huang J; Du L PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240285. PubMed ID: 33057355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Life cycle assessment of single-use surgical and embedded filtration layer (EFL) reusable face mask. Lee AWL; Neo ERK; Khoo ZY; Yeo Z; Tan YS; Chng S; Yan W; Lok BK; Low JSC Resour Conserv Recycl; 2021 Jul; 170():105580. PubMed ID: 33814723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of washing on quality, breathability performance and reusability of disposable face masks. Hassani S; Henni L; Sidali A; Naitbouda A; Khereddine A; Dergham D; Lekoui F J Med Eng Technol; 2022 Jul; 46(5):345-353. PubMed ID: 35311595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A cloth mask for under-resourced healthcare settings in the COVID19 pandemic. Sugrue M; O'Keeffe D; Sugrue R; MacLean L; Varzgalis M Ir J Med Sci; 2020 Nov; 189(4):1155-1157. PubMed ID: 32394153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing face masks in the environment by means of the DPSIR framework. Tesfaldet YT; Ndeh NT Sci Total Environ; 2022 Mar; 814():152859. PubMed ID: 34995587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A life cycle assessment of reprocessing face masks during the Covid-19 pandemic. van Straten B; Ligtelijn S; Droog L; Putman E; Dankelman J; Weiland NHS; Horeman T Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):17680. PubMed ID: 34480045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]