296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35165351)
1. Reconciling human health with the environment while struggling against the COVID-19 pandemic through improved face mask eco-design.
Morone P; Yilan G; Imbert E; Becchetti L
Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2445. PubMed ID: 35165351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Face masks. Technical, technological and functional characteristics and hygienic-sanitary aspects related to the use of filtering mask in the community.
Santarsiero A; Ciambelli P; Donsì G; Quadrini F; Briancesco R; D'Alessandro D; Fara GM
Ann Ig; 2020; 32(5):472-520. PubMed ID: 32744582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A laboratory-based study examining the properties of silk fabric to evaluate its potential as a protective barrier for personal protective equipment and as a functional material for face coverings during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Parlin AF; Stratton SM; Culley TM; Guerra PA
PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0239531. PubMed ID: 32946526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Masks as personal protective equipment in the COVID-19 pandemic: How, when and which should be used].
Aranaz Andrés JM; Gea Velázquez de Castro MT; Vicente-Guijarro J; Beltrán Peribáñez J; García Haro M; Valencia-Martín JL; Bischofberger Valdés C; ;
J Healthc Qual Res; 2020; 35(4):245-252. PubMed ID: 32680724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. COVID-19: mask efficacy is dependent on both fabric and fit.
Darby S; Chulliyallipalil K; Przyjalgowski M; McGowan P; Jeffers S; Giltinan A; Lewis L; Smith N; Sleator RD
Future Microbiol; 2021 Jan; 16():5-11. PubMed ID: 33350330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. One size fits all?: A simulation framework for face-mask fit on population-based faces.
Solano T; Mittal R; Shoele K
PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252143. PubMed ID: 34133436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Filtration Efficiencies of Nanoscale Aerosol by Cloth Mask Materials Used to Slow the Spread of SARS-CoV-2.
Zangmeister CD; Radney JG; Vicenzi EP; Weaver JL
ACS Nano; 2020 Jul; 14(7):9188-9200. PubMed ID: 32584542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Environmental implication of personal protection equipment in the pandemic era: LCA comparison of face masks typologies.
Rodríguez NB; Formentini G; Favi C; Marconi M
Procedia CIRP; 2021; 98():306-311. PubMed ID: 33723504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reusable Face Masks as Alternative for Disposable Medical Masks: Factors that Affect their Wear-Comfort.
Lee KP; Yip J; Kan CW; Chiou JC; Yung KF
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(18):. PubMed ID: 32932918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways.
Eckelman M; Mosher M; Gonzalez A; Sherman J
Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 22492190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cloth masks versus medical masks for COVID-19 protection.
Szarpak L; Smereka J; Filipiak KJ; Ladny JR; Jaguszewski M
Cardiol J; 2020; 27(2):218-219. PubMed ID: 32285928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Protection Level and Reusability of a Modified Full-Face Snorkel Mask as Alternative Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Schmitt J; Jones LS; Aeby EA; Gloor C; Moser B; Wang J
Chem Res Toxicol; 2021 Jan; 34(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 33331780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Environmental risks of polymer materials from disposable face masks linked to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Du H; Huang S; Wang J
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Apr; 815():152980. PubMed ID: 35007580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Protective Face Masks: Current Status and Future Trends.
Tuñón-Molina A; Takayama K; Redwan EM; Uversky VN; Andrés J; Serrano-Aroca Á
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2021 Dec; 13(48):56725-56751. PubMed ID: 34797624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Validation of surgical masks during COVID19 emergency: activities at the University of Napoli Federico II].
D'Anna A; Di Natale F; De Falco G; Di Maio E; Tammaro D; Quaglia F; Ungaro F; Cassiano C; Salvatore P; Colicchio R; Scaglione E; Pagliuca C; Fontana L; Iavicoli I
G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2020 Jun; 42(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 32614536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selection of homemade mask materials for preventing transmission of COVID-19: A laboratory study.
Wang D; You Y; Zhou X; Zong Z; Huang H; Zhang H; Yong X; Cheng Y; Yang L; Guo Q; Long Y; Liu Y; Huang J; Du L
PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240285. PubMed ID: 33057355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Life cycle assessment of single-use surgical and embedded filtration layer (EFL) reusable face mask.
Lee AWL; Neo ERK; Khoo ZY; Yeo Z; Tan YS; Chng S; Yan W; Lok BK; Low JSC
Resour Conserv Recycl; 2021 Jul; 170():105580. PubMed ID: 33814723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing face masks in the environment by means of the DPSIR framework.
Tesfaldet YT; Ndeh NT
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Mar; 814():152859. PubMed ID: 34995587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Life cycle environmental impacts of disposable medical masks.
Atılgan Türkmen B
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Apr; 29(17):25496-25506. PubMed ID: 34841484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of washing on quality, breathability performance and reusability of disposable face masks.
Hassani S; Henni L; Sidali A; Naitbouda A; Khereddine A; Dergham D; Lekoui F
J Med Eng Technol; 2022 Jul; 46(5):345-353. PubMed ID: 35311595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
