122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35165488)
21. Knowledge-based planning in robotic intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery treatments.
Yu S; Xu H; Zhang Y; Zhang X; Dyer MA; Hirsch AE; Tam Truong M; Zhen H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 22(3):48-54. PubMed ID: 33560592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of delivered dose to a moving target by 4D dose reconstruction in gated volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Chung H; Jung J; Jeong C; Kwak J; Park JH; Kim SS; Yoon SM; Song SY; Kim JH; Choi EK; Cho S; Cho B
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0202765. PubMed ID: 30192793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Do technological advances in linear accelerators improve dosimetric outcomes in stereotaxy? A head-on comparison of seven linear accelerators using volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic planning.
Sarkar B; Pradhan A; Munshi A
Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 27146771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dosimetric effect of rotational setup errors in stereotactic radiosurgery with HyperArc for single and multiple brain metastases.
Sagawa T; Ohira S; Ueda Y; Akino Y; Mizuno H; Matsumoto M; Miyazaki M; Koizumi M; Teshima T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):84-91. PubMed ID: 31507075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Split-volume treatment planning of multiple consecutive vertebral body metastases for cyberknife image-guided robotic radiosurgery.
Sahgal A; Chuang C; Larson D; Huang K; Petti P; Weinstein P; Ma L
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(3):175-9. PubMed ID: 18674681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of four techniques for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy: Dosimetric and efficiency analysis.
Aljabab S; Vellayappan B; Vandervoort E; Bahm J; Zohr R; Sinclair J; Caudrelier JM; Szanto J; Malone S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):160-167. PubMed ID: 29417728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Treatment planning of VMAT and step-and-shoot IMRT delivery techniques for single fraction spine SBRT: An intercomparative dosimetric analysis and phantom-based quality assurance measurements.
Ouyang Z; LaHurd DV; Balagamwala EH; Chao ST; Suh JH; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 31821729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Noncoplanar VMAT for Brain Metastases: A Plan Quality and Delivery Efficiency Comparison With Coplanar VMAT, IMRT, and CyberKnife.
Zhang S; Yang R; Shi C; Li J; Zhuang H; Tian S; Wang J
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jan; 18():1533033819871621. PubMed ID: 31451059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dosimetric comparison of two treatment planning systems for spine SBRT.
Lee YK; Munawar I; Mashouf S; Sahgal A; Ruschin M
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 31376988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Set-up error and dosimetric analysis of HexaPOD evo RT 6D couch combined with cone beam CT image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary malignant tumor of the cervical spine.
Jiang P; Zhang X; Wei S; Zhao T; Wang J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 21(4):22-30. PubMed ID: 32170991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The dosimetric impact of titanium implants in spinal SBRT using four commercial treatment planning algorithms.
Liu CW; Cho YB; Magnelli A; Angelov L; Balagamwala EH; Chao ST; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 24(10):e14070. PubMed ID: 37540084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Use of jaw tracking in intensity modulated and volumetric modulated arc radiation therapy for spine stereotactic radiosurgery.
Snyder KC; Wen N; Huang Y; Kim J; Zhao B; Siddiqui S; Chetty IJ; Ryu S
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(3):e155-e162. PubMed ID: 25413433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Volumetric arc intensity-modulated therapy for spine body radiotherapy: comparison with static intensity-modulated treatment.
Wu QJ; Yoo S; Kirkpatrick JP; Thongphiew D; Yin FF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Dec; 75(5):1596-604. PubMed ID: 19733447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Benefit of dosimetry distribution for patients with multiple brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer by a Cyberknife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) system.
Yu X; Wang Y; Yuan Z; Yu H; Song Y; Zhao L; Wang P
BMC Cancer; 2020 Nov; 20(1):1144. PubMed ID: 33238967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dosimetric study of different radiotherapy planning approaches for hippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT) based on fused CT and MRI imaging.
Wang BH; Hua W; Gu X; Wang XL; Li J; Liu LQ; Huang YX
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Dec; 38(4):767-75. PubMed ID: 26577714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Heterogeneity correction for intensity-modulated frameless SRS in pituitary and cavernous sinus tumors: a retrospective study.
Shields LB; Bond C; Odom A; Sun DA; Spalding AC
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Sep; 10():193. PubMed ID: 26377815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of Ray Tracing and Monte Carlo Calculation Algorithms for Thoracic Spine Lesions Treated With CyberKnife-Based Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.
Okoye CC; Patel RB; Hasan S; Podder T; Khouri A; Fabien J; Zhang Y; Dobbins D; Sohn JW; Yuan J; Yao M; Machtay M; Sloan AE; Miller J; Lo SS
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Feb; 15(1):196-202. PubMed ID: 25633137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Dosimetric comparison of non-small cell lung cancer treatment with multi fields dynamic-MLC IMRT].
Hao L; Wang D; Cao Y; Du F; Cao F; Liu C
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 May; 95(19):1526-9. PubMed ID: 26178508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Determining appropriate timing of adaptive radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma during intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Huang H; Lu H; Feng G; Jiang H; Chen J; Cheng J; Pang Q; Lu Z; Gu J; Peng L; Deng S; Mo Y; Wu D; Wei Y
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Sep; 10():192. PubMed ID: 26377685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dosimetric and planning efficiency comparison for lung SBRT: CyberKnife vs VMAT vs knowledge-based VMAT.
Yu S; Xu H; Sinclair A; Zhang X; Langner U; Mak K
Med Dosim; 2020 Winter; 45(4):346-351. PubMed ID: 32532613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
