BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35165574)

  • 1. Efficacy of Different Sterilization Techniques for Toothbrush Decontamination: An Ex Vivo Study.
    Assari AS; Mohammed Mahrous M; Ahmad YA; Alotaibi F; Alshammari M; AlTurki F; AlShammari T
    Cureus; 2022 Jan; 14(1):e21117. PubMed ID: 35165574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Prospective Study on Assessment of Microbial Contamination of Toothbrushes and Methods of Their Decontamination.
    Pradeep S; Nandini G; Hiranmayi S; Kumar G; Bijjala NK; Guduri S
    Cureus; 2022 Oct; 14(10):e30155. PubMed ID: 36397901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of toothbrush disinfection via different methods.
    Basman A; Peker I; Akca G; Alkurt MT; Sarikir C; Celik I
    Braz Oral Res; 2016; 30():. PubMed ID: 26676193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microbial contamination of toothbrushes and their decontamination.
    Nelson Filho P; Macari S; Faria G; Assed S; Ito IY
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 11048305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating sanitization of toothbrushes using ultra violet rays and 0.2% chlorhexidine solution: A comparative clinical study.
    Tomar P; Hongal S; Saxena V; Jain M; Rana K; Ganavadiya R
    J Basic Clin Pharm; 2014 Dec; 6(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 25538466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of ultraviolet and microwave sanitization techniques for toothbrush decontamination.
    Gujjari SK; Gujjari AK; Patel PV; Shubhashini PV
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2011 Jan; 1(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 24478949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bacterial contamination and decontamination of toothbrushes after use.
    Mehta A; Sequeira PS; Bhat G
    N Y State Dent J; 2007 Apr; 73(3):20-2. PubMed ID: 17508674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antimicrobial efficacy of various disinfecting solutions in reducing the contamination of the toothbrush -- a comparative study.
    Balappanavar AY; Nagesh L; Ankola AV; Tangade PS; Kakodkar P; Varun S
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2009; 7(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 19583039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduction in bacterial contamination of toothbrushes using the Violight ultraviolet light activated toothbrush sanitizer.
    Boylan R; Li Y; Simeonova L; Sherwin G; Kreismann J; Craig RG; Ship JA; McCutcheon JA
    Am J Dent; 2008 Oct; 21(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 19024257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of garlic, tea tree oil, cetylpyridinium chloride, chlorhexidine, and ultraviolet sanitizing device in the decontamination of toothbrush.
    Chandrdas D; Jayakumar HL; Chandra M; Katodia L; Sreedevi A
    Indian J Dent; 2014 Oct; 5(4):183-9. PubMed ID: 25565751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating Sanitization of Toothbrushes Using Various Decontamination Methods: A Meta-Analysis.
    Agrawal SK; Dahal S; Bhumika TV; Nair NS
    J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2019 Jan; 16(41):364-371. PubMed ID: 30739916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Toothbrush Contamination and Disinfection Among Undergraduate Students in Selected Universities in Somalia.
    Hussein SA; Hussein AA; Nur AM; Ali AN; Mohamed YG; Ali AJA
    Clin Cosmet Investig Dent; 2024; 16():33-40. PubMed ID: 38410674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of five treatment protocols for contaminated bone grafts in reference to sterility and cell viability.
    Bauer J; Liu RW; Kean TJ; Dennis JE; Petersilge W; Gilmore A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Mar; 93(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 21368075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of Microbial Contamination of a Toothbrush Head with and without a Protective Cover: An
    Manohar R; Venkatesan K; Raja S; Ganesh A; Kanakasabapathy BS
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2022; 15(4):455-457. PubMed ID: 36875982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of alternative methods for toothbrush disinfection: an in vitro study.
    Peker I; Akca G; Sarikir C; Alkurt MT; Celik I
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():726190. PubMed ID: 24971388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the Efficacy of Three Types of Disinfectants Approved for Oral Use in Japan in Reducing the Bacterial Count of Tongue Coating: A Randomised-Controlled Study.
    Funahara M; Soutome S; Nakamura A; Soh I; Honda H; Hikiji H
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2021 Jan; 19():405-409. PubMed ID: 34259433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contamination of toothbrush at different time intervals and effectiveness of various disinfecting solutions in reducing the contamination of toothbrush.
    Sogi SH; Subbareddy VV; Kiran SN
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2002 Sep; 20(3):81-5. PubMed ID: 12435003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of two mouth rinse sprays in inhibiting
    Talaat DM; Sharaf AAE; Ghoneim MAE; El-Shazly SA; El Meligy OAES
    Saudi Dent J; 2018 Oct; 30(4):365-372. PubMed ID: 30202175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of alternative methods for the disinfection of toothbrushes.
    Komiyama EY; Back-Brito GN; Balducci I; Koga-Ito CY
    Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 20339710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disinfection of toothbrushes contaminated with Streptococcus mutans.
    Bélanger-Giguère K; Giguère S; Bélanger M
    Am J Dent; 2011 Jun; 24(3):155-8. PubMed ID: 21874935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.