These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3516567)

  • 1. Syncope and other vasovagal reactions at interval insertion of Lippes Loop D--who is most vulnerable?
    Chi IC; Wilkens LR; Siemens AJ; Lippes J
    Contraception; 1986 Feb; 33(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 3516567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do insertion-related problems affect subsequent IUD performance?
    Chi IC; Waszak CS; Wilkens LR
    Contraception; 1986 Nov; 34(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 3816233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women].
    Prilepskaia VN; Mezhevitinova EA
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 Apr; (4):5-8. PubMed ID: 1862876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Severe pain at interval IUD insertion: a case-control analysis of patient risk factors.
    Chi IC; Galich LF; Tauber PF; Wilkens LR; Waszak CS; Siemens AJ; Lippes J
    Contraception; 1986 Nov; 34(5):483-95. PubMed ID: 3816232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of copper T-200 with Lippes loop as a contraceptive device.
    Wright EA; Aisien OA
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Jun; 29(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 2568294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some observations on intrauterine contraceptive device (Lippes loop).
    Menon MK
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 1970 Jun; 20(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 12275251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrocardiographic changes induced by insertion of an intrauterine device and other uterine manipulations.
    Aznar R; Reynoso L; Ley E; Gámez R; De León MD
    Fertil Steril; 1976 Jan; 27(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 1245249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Postpartum IUDS: keys for success.
    O'Hanley K; Huber DH
    Contraception; 1992 Apr; 45(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 1516367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pelvic inflammatory disease and the intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Wright EA; Aisien AO
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Feb; 28(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 2563699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A clinical study comparing the performance of three IUCDs (Multiload Copper 250, Copper T 200, and Lippes Loop C).
    Fakhr MM; Fakhr DM; Hassan AA; Nasser NM
    Popul Sci; 1988; 8():39-53. PubMed ID: 12316112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of adding copper onto Lippes Loop IUDs: results from a ten-year study in Yugoslavia.
    Randic L; Haller H; Perovic M; Farr G
    Contraception; 1991 Mar; 43(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 2036794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized comparison of the Ypsilon-Y and Lippes loop D intrauterine devices in parous women.
    Brenner PF; Roy S; Mishell DR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Mar; 51(3):327-9. PubMed ID: 628535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized comparative trial of the Lippes Loop D, Gravigard and TCu 220C IUDs.
    Mccarthy TG; Lim LS; Chew SC; Heng SH; Ratnam SS
    Adv Contracept Deliv Syst; 1985; (1):113-21. PubMed ID: 12267106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Ectopic Lippes' intrauterine devices. Hysterography].
    Villablanca E
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1970; 35(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 5531977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspective.
    Farley TM; Rosenberg MJ; Rowe PJ; Chen JH; Meirik O
    Lancet; 1992 Mar; 339(8796):785-8. PubMed ID: 1347812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postpartum and postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Martorella LA; Esposito JM
    J Reprod Med; 1975 Apr; 14(4):178-81. PubMed ID: 1142352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors affecting intrauterine contraceptive device performance. I. Endometrial cavity length.
    Hasson HM; Berger GS; Edelman DA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Dec; 126(8):973-81. PubMed ID: 998687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time to conception after IUD removal: importance of duration of use, IUD type, pelvic inflammatory disease and age.
    Andolsek L; Teeter RA; Kozuh-Novak M; Wheeler R; Fortney JA; Rosenberg MJ
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1986 Jun; 24(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 2880761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: recent developments.
    Grimes DA
    Contraception; 1987 Jul; 36(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 3311628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized clinical study of the TCu-380 A and the TCu-200 B. IUDs.
    Kandil OF; El-sheikha Z; Hamza A
    Popul Sci; 1991 Jan; 10():35-40. PubMed ID: 12284660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.