BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35167007)

  • 21. Assessing the role of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.
    Bogani G; Di Donato V; Muzii L; Casarin J; Ghezzi F; Malzoni M; Greggi S; Landoni F; Bazzurini L; Zanagnolo V; Multinu F; Angioli R; Plotti F; Caruso G; Fischetti M; Ferrandina G; Palaia I; Benedetti Panici P; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Aug; 275():64-69. PubMed ID: 35753229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
    Kim SI; Lee J; Hong J; Lee SJ; Park DC; Yoon JH
    Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(5):1312-1317. PubMed ID: 33526992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Minimally invasive surgery for radical hysterectomy in women with cervical cancer: Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Surgery position statement.
    Kim M; Kong TW; Kim S; Kim SC; Kim YB; Kim JW; Park JY; Suh DH; Shim SH; Lee KH; Lee SJ; Lee JK; Lim MC
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 30(5):e104. PubMed ID: 31328466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Laparoendoscopic Single-site Radical Hysterectomy with Vaginal Closure and without Uterine Manipulator for FIGO IB1 Cervical Cancer.
    Chen S; Zheng Y; Tong L; Zhao X; Chen L; Wang Y
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(7):1471-1472. PubMed ID: 31926301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Protective operative techniques in radical hysterectomy in early cervical carcinoma and their influence on disease-free and overall survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk groups.
    Kampers J; Gerhardt E; Sibbertsen P; Flock T; Klapdor R; Hertel H; Jentschke M; Hillemanns P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Sep; 304(3):577-587. PubMed ID: 34021804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
    Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Changing treatment landscape for early cervical cancer: outcomes reported with minimally invasive surgery compared with an open approach.
    Melamed A; Ramirez PT
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 32(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 31815768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Minimally invasive radical trachelectomy: Considerations on surgical approach.
    Salvo G; Pareja R; Ramirez PT
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Sep; 75():113-122. PubMed ID: 33888410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Smith AJB; Jones TN; Miao D; Fader AN
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):544-555.e7. PubMed ID: 33359291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robotic surgery for cervical cancer.
    Magrina JF; Zanagnolo VL
    Yonsei Med J; 2008 Dec; 49(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 19108008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Standardization and experience may influence the survival of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Lee CL; Huang KG; Chua PT; Mendoza MCVR; Lee PS; Lai SY
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 60(3):463-467. PubMed ID: 33966729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of the complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgical treatments for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li Y; Kong Q; Wei H; Wang Y
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253143. PubMed ID: 34197466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pattern of relapse in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy as primary treatment. Minimally invasive surgery vs. open approach. Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Manzour N; Núñez-Cordoba JM; Chiva L; Chacón E; Boria F; Vara-García J; Rodriguez-Velandia YP; Minguez JA; Alcazar JL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 164(2):455-460. PubMed ID: 34848071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Efficacy of different surgical approaches in the clinical and survival outcomes of patients with early-stage cervical cancer: protocol of a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial in China.
    Chao X; Li L; Wu M; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Lang J; Cheng A; Li W
    BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e029055. PubMed ID: 31362966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial.
    Falconer H; Palsdottir K; Stalberg K; Dahm-Kähler P; Ottander U; Lundin ES; Wijk L; Kimmig R; Jensen PT; Zahl Eriksson AG; Mäenpää J; Persson J; Salehi S
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jul; 29(6):1072-1076. PubMed ID: 31203203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
    Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. International radical trachelectomy assessment: IRTA study.
    Salvo G; Ramirez PT; Leitao M; Cibula D; Fotopoulou C; Kucukmetin A; Rendon G; Perrotta M; Ribeiro R; Vieira M; Baiocchi G; Falconer H; Persson J; Wu X; Căpilna ME; Ioanid N; Mosgaard BJ; Berlev I; Kaidarova D; Olawaiye AB; Liu K; Nobre SP; Kocian R; Saso S; Rundle S; Noll F; Tsunoda AT; Palsdottir K; Li X; Ulrikh E; Hu Z; Pareja R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Mar; 29(3):635-638. PubMed ID: 30765489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery.
    Vieira MA; Rendón GJ; Munsell M; Echeverri L; Frumovitz M; Schmeler KM; Pareja R; Escobar PF; Reis RD; Ramirez PT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):585-9. PubMed ID: 26095894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Current situation and deliberating the application of open or minimally invasive surgery for the cervical cancer].
    Ling KJ; Liang ZQ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Jul; 102(26):1967-1972. PubMed ID: 35817721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.