These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

487 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35167106)

  • 1. The role of attention control in complex real-world tasks.
    Draheim C; Pak R; Draheim AA; Engle RW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1143-1197. PubMed ID: 35167106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Relevance of Attention Control, Not Working Memory, in Human Factors.
    Pak R; McLaughlin AC; Engle R
    Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1321-1332. PubMed ID: 36853758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Adam KC; Mance I; Fukuda K; Vogel EK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 27(8):1601-16. PubMed ID: 25811710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The scope and control of attention: Sources of variance in working memory capacity.
    Chow M; Conway AR
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Apr; 43(3):325-39. PubMed ID: 25604642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The neurotic wandering mind: An individual differences investigation of neuroticism, mind-wandering, and executive control.
    Robison MK; Gath KI; Unsworth N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):649-663. PubMed ID: 26821933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual differences in long-term memory.
    Unsworth N
    Psychol Bull; 2019 Jan; 145(1):79-139. PubMed ID: 30596433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities.
    Unsworth N; Fukuda K; Awh E; Vogel EK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):853-65. PubMed ID: 25436671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual differences in attentional control predict working memory capacity in adults who stutter.
    Tichenor SE; Wray AH; Ravizza SM; Yaruss JS
    J Commun Disord; 2022; 100():106273. PubMed ID: 36274445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Working memory and inattentional blindness.
    Bredemeier K; Simons DJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Apr; 19(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 22222359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual differences in updating are not related to reasoning ability and working memory capacity.
    Frischkorn GT; von Bastian CC; Souza AS; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Jun; 151(6):1341-1357. PubMed ID: 35201837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual differences in working memory capacity and the regulation of arousal.
    Robison MK; Brewer GA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3273-3290. PubMed ID: 32651927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Replication and extension of the toolbox approach to measuring attention control.
    Draheim C; Tshukara JS; Engle RW
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):2135-2157. PubMed ID: 37253957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An examination of relations between baseline pupil measures and cognitive abilities.
    Robison MK; Coyne JT; Sibley C; Brown NL; Neilson B; Foroughi C
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Dec; 59(12):e14124. PubMed ID: 35711148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in executive attention and inhibitory control are related to spatial memory biases in adults.
    Schutte AR; Wu Y; Jacoby MN
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Feb; 76(2):391-403. PubMed ID: 35331058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Working memory is a core executive function supporting dual-task locomotor performance across childhood and adolescence.
    Hocking DR; Fritsche S; Farhat H; Atkinson A; Bendak H; Menant J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Sep; 197():104869. PubMed ID: 32574754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Working memory capacity as controlled attention in tactical decision making.
    Furley PA; Memmert D
    J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2012 Jun; 34(3):322-44. PubMed ID: 22691397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What causes auditory distraction?
    Macken WJ; Phelps FG; Jones DM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19145024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of "executive attention".
    Kane MJ; Poole BJ; Tuholski SW; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):749-77. PubMed ID: 16822145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High working memory capacity does not always attenuate distraction: Bayesian evidence in support of the null hypothesis.
    Sörqvist P; Marsh JE; Nöstl A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Oct; 20(5):897-904. PubMed ID: 23479339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual working memory capacity is uniquely correlated with feature-based attention when combined with spatial attention.
    Bengson JJ; Mangun GR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):86-102. PubMed ID: 21258911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.