178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35169241)
1. Comparison of different surgical methods and strategies for inguinal lymph node dissection in patients with penile cancer.
Shao Y; Hu X; Ren S; Liao D; Yang Z; Liu Y; Lia T; Wu K; Xiong S; Yang W; Feng S; Wang Y; Li X
Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2560. PubMed ID: 35169241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Management of the lymph nodes in penile cancer.
Heyns CF; Fleshner N; Sangar V; Schlenker B; Yuvaraja TB; van Poppel H
Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2 Suppl 1):S43-57. PubMed ID: 20691885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of clinical feasibility and oncological outcomes between video endoscopic and open inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hu J; Li H; Cui Y; Liu P; Zhou X; Liu L; Chen H; Chen J; Zu X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 May; 98(22):e15862. PubMed ID: 31145338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive approaches to the inguinal nodes in cN0 patients.
Nabavizadeh R; Master V
Curr Opin Urol; 2019 Mar; 29(2):165-172. PubMed ID: 30601183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Immediate Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection Improves Survival in Patients of Penile Cancer].
Wang HZ; Liu ZH; Liu JB; Ren SQ; Zhao T; Zeng H; Li X
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 May; 47(3):371-5. PubMed ID: 27468483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally Invasive Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in the Management of Penile Carcinoma.
Russell CM; Salami SS; Niemann A; Weizer AZ; Tomlins SA; Morgan TM; Montgomery JS
Urology; 2017 Aug; 106():113-118. PubMed ID: 28450202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inguinal lymph node dissection in the era of minimally invasive surgical technology.
Nabavizadeh R; Petrinec B; Nabavizadeh B; Singh A; Rawal S; Master V
Urol Oncol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 32855056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single-port robotic inguinal lymph node dissection: A safe and feasible option for penile cancer.
Patel AS; Isharwal S
Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101633. PubMed ID: 34332496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy using simultaneous double laparoscopies for penile cancer: A retrospective study.
Ma S; Zhang K; Li R; Lu J; Wu T; Liu Z; Fu X; Tang Q; Ma J
Urol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):112.e1-112.e9. PubMed ID: 35090820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Current practice patterns of society of urologic oncology members in performing inguinal lymph node staging/therapy for penile cancer: A survey study.
Marilin N; Master VA; Pettaway CA; Spiess PE
Urol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):439.e9-439.e15. PubMed ID: 33775532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contemporary inguinal lymph node dissection: minimizing complications.
Spiess PE; Hernandez MS; Pettaway CA
World J Urol; 2009 Apr; 27(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 18762945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective study comparing video-endoscopic radical inguinal lymph node dissection (VEILND) with open radical ILND (OILND) for penile cancer over an 8-year period.
Kumar V; Sethia KK
BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):530-534. PubMed ID: 27628265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wound Complication Rates after Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection: Contemporary Analysis of the NSQIP Database.
Chua KJ; Balraj V; Patel HV; Srivastava A; Doppalapudi SK; Elsamra SE; Jang TL; Singer EA; Ghodoussipour SB
J Am Coll Surg; 2023 Jan; 236(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 36519902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Update in the surgical principles and therapeutic outcomes of inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer.
Ercole CE; Pow-Sang JM; Spiess PE
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):505-16. PubMed ID: 21481617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preservation of the saphenous vein during laparoendoscopic single-site inguinal lymphadenectomy: comparison with the conventional laparoscopic technique.
Yuan JB; Chen MF; Qi L; Li Y; Li YL; Chen C; Chen JB; Zu XB; Liu LF
BJU Int; 2015 Apr; 115(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 24947014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Saphenous-sparing laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy.
Chiapparrone G; Rapisarda S; de Concilio B; Zeccolini G; Antoniutti M; Celia A
Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(3):645-646. PubMed ID: 29064655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of inguinal lymph node dissection in men with urethral squamous cell carcinoma.
Werntz RP; Riedinger CB; Fantus RJ; Smith ZL; Packiam VT; Adamsky MA; Smith N; Steinberg GD
Urol Oncol; 2018 Dec; 36(12):526.e1-526.e6. PubMed ID: 30446445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Saphenous vein sparing during laparoscopic bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma patients.
Cui Y; Chen H; Liu L; Chen Z; Chen J; Qi L; Zu X
Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Mar; 48(3):363-6. PubMed ID: 26660956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A laparoscopic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy approach partly preserving great saphenous vein branches can benefit for patients with penile carcinoma.
Ma Y; Hao J; Yin H; Zhu M; Guan B; Zhu C; Dong B; Zhao S; He Z; Yang T
BMC Surg; 2022 Apr; 22(1):138. PubMed ID: 35397549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Minimally Invasive Procedures for Surgical Inguinal Nodal Staging in Penile Carcinoma.
Greco I; Fernandez-Pello S; Sakalis VI; Barreto L; Albersen M; Ayres B; Antunes Lopes T; Campi R; Crook J; García Perdomo HA; Johnstone PAS; Kailavasan M; Manzie K; Marcus JD; Necchi A; Oliveira P; Osborne J; Pagliaro LC; Parnham AS; Pettaway CA; Protzel C; Rumble RB; Sachdeva A; Sanchez Martinez DF; Zapala Ł; Tagawa ST; Spiess PE; Brouwer OR
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38071107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
