These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35169849)

  • 1. Analyzing Phylogenetic Trees with a Tree Lattice Coordinate System and a Graph Polynomial.
    Liu P; Biller P; Gould M; Colijn C
    Syst Biol; 2022 Oct; 71(6):1378-1390. PubMed ID: 35169849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Metric on Phylogenetic Tree Shapes.
    Colijn C; Plazzotta G
    Syst Biol; 2018 Jan; 67(1):113-126. PubMed ID: 28472435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying the rooted species tree from the distribution of unrooted gene trees under the coalescent.
    Allman ES; Degnan JH; Rhodes JA
    J Math Biol; 2011 Jun; 62(6):833-62. PubMed ID: 20652704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliable estimation of tree branch lengths using deep neural networks.
    Suvorov A; Schrider DR
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2024 Aug; 20(8):e1012337. PubMed ID: 39102450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do Branch Lengths Help to Locate a Tree in a Phylogenetic Network?
    Gambette P; van Iersel L; Kelk S; Pardi F; Scornavacca C
    Bull Math Biol; 2016 Sep; 78(9):1773-1795. PubMed ID: 27659024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficient FPT Algorithms for (Strict) Compatibility of Unrooted Phylogenetic Trees.
    Baste J; Paul C; Sau I; Scornavacca C
    Bull Math Biol; 2017 Apr; 79(4):920-938. PubMed ID: 28247121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The K tree score: quantification of differences in the relative branch length and topology of phylogenetic trees.
    Soria-Carrasco V; Talavera G; Igea J; Castresana J
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Nov; 23(21):2954-6. PubMed ID: 17890735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Network science inspires novel tree shape statistics.
    Chindelevitch L; Hayati M; Poon AFY; Colijn C
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0259877. PubMed ID: 34941890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Generalization of Phylogenetic Matching Metrics with Experimental Tests of Practical Advantages.
    Bogdanowicz D; Giaro K
    J Comput Biol; 2023 Mar; 30(3):261-276. PubMed ID: 36576792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enumeration of binary trees compatible with a perfect phylogeny.
    Palacios JA; Bhaskar A; Disanto F; Rosenberg NA
    J Math Biol; 2022 May; 84(6):54. PubMed ID: 35552538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data.
    Nei M; Tajima F; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1983; 19(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 6571220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discrete coalescent trees.
    Collienne L; Elmes K; Fischer M; Bryant D; Gavryushkin A
    J Math Biol; 2021 Nov; 83(5):60. PubMed ID: 34739608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metrics on multilabeled trees: interrelationships and diameter bounds.
    Huber KT; Spillner A; Suchecki R; Moulton V
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(4):1029-40. PubMed ID: 21116046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of Phylogenetic Trees: The Prokaryotic Forest of Life.
    Puigbò P; Wolf YI; Koonin EV
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1910():241-269. PubMed ID: 31278667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two results about the Sackin and Colless indices for phylogenetic trees and their shapes.
    Goh G; Fuchs M; Zhang L
    J Math Biol; 2022 Nov; 85(6-7):69. PubMed ID: 36418585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of phylogenetic trees defined on different but mutually overlapping sets of taxa: A review.
    Li W; Koshkarov A; Tahiri N
    Ecol Evol; 2024 Aug; 14(8):e70054. PubMed ID: 39119174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measures of clade confidence do not correlate with accuracy of phylogenetic trees.
    Hall BG; Salipante SJ
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2007 Mar; 3(3):e51. PubMed ID: 17367204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tree-based networks: characterisations, metrics, and support trees.
    Pons JC; Semple C; Steel M
    J Math Biol; 2019 Mar; 78(4):899-918. PubMed ID: 30283985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On cherry and pitchfork distributions of random rooted and unrooted phylogenetic trees.
    Choi KP; Thompson A; Wu T
    Theor Popul Biol; 2020 Apr; 132():92-104. PubMed ID: 32135170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design.
    McCormack JE; Huang H; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 20525604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.