124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35169895)
1. Prostate volume prediction on MRI: tools, accuracy and variability.
Hamzaoui D; Montagne S; Granger B; Allera A; Ezziane M; Luzurier A; Quint R; Kalai M; Ayache N; Delingette H; Renard-Penna R
Eur Radiol; 2022 Jul; 32(7):4931-4941. PubMed ID: 35169895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate Volume Estimation on MRI: Accuracy and Effects of Ellipsoid and Bullet-Shaped Measurements on PSA Density.
Stanzione A; Ponsiglione A; Di Fiore GA; Picchi SG; Di Stasi M; Verde F; Petretta M; Imbriaco M; Cuocolo R
Acad Radiol; 2021 Aug; 28(8):e219-e226. PubMed ID: 32553281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of PI-RADS Versions 2.0 and 2.1 for MRI-based Calculation of the Prostate Volume.
Ghafoor S; Becker AS; Woo S; Causa Andrieu PI; Stocker D; Gangai N; Hricak H; Vargas HA
Acad Radiol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1548-1556. PubMed ID: 32814644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Which measurement method should be used for prostate volume for PI-RADS? A comparison of ellipsoid and segmentation methods.
Colvin R; Walker D; Hafron J; Seifman B; Nandalur S; Gangwish D; Nandalur KR
Clin Imaging; 2021 Dec; 80():454-458. PubMed ID: 34562834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deep learning algorithm performs similarly to radiologists in the assessment of prostate volume on MRI.
Thimansson E; Bengtsson J; Baubeta E; Engman J; Flondell-Sité D; Bjartell A; Zackrisson S
Eur Radiol; 2023 Apr; 33(4):2519-2528. PubMed ID: 36371606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determination of Prostate Volume: A Comparison of Contemporary Methods.
Bezinque A; Moriarity A; Farrell C; Peabody H; Noyes SL; Lane BR
Acad Radiol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1582-1587. PubMed ID: 29609953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimated Prostate Volume by Semiautomatic Segmentation of MRI Is More Accurately Correlated with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen Weight than the Volume Calculated by Ellipsoid Formula.
Wu S; Feldman AS; Lin SX; Kim MM; Cornejo KM; Harisinghani MG; Wu CL; Dahl DM
Urol Int; 2024; 108(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 37995664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transabdominal ultrasound and MRI with the radical prostatectomy specimen volume: a retrospective observational study.
Guo S; Zhang J; Jiao J; Li Z; Wu P; Jing Y; Qin W; Wang F; Ma S
BMC Urol; 2023 Apr; 23(1):62. PubMed ID: 37069539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of Prostate Volume with MRI (A Guide for the Perplexed): Biproximate Method with Analysis of Precision and Accuracy.
Wasserman NF; Niendorf E; Spilseth B
Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):575. PubMed ID: 31953425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated computer-derived prostate volumes from MR imaging data: comparison with radiologist-derived MR imaging and pathologic specimen volumes.
Bulman JC; Toth R; Patel AD; Bloch BN; McMahon CJ; Ngo L; Madabhushi A; Rofsky NM
Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 22190657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Same-day repeatability and Between-Sequence reproducibility of Mean ADC in PI-RADS lesions.
Zhang KS; Neelsen CJO; Wennmann M; Glemser PA; Hielscher T; Weru V; Görtz M; Schütz V; Stenzinger A; Hohenfellner M; Schlemmer HP; Bonekamp D
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 165():110898. PubMed ID: 37331287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A standardized method to measure the membranous urethral length (MUL) on MRI of the prostate with high inter- and intra-observer agreement.
Veerman H; Hagens MJ; Hoeks CM; van der Poel HG; van Leeuwen PJ; Vis AN; Heijmink SWTJP; Schoots IG; de Haan MC; Boellaard TN
Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3295-3302. PubMed ID: 36512044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network for Prostate MRI Segmentation and Comparison of Prostate Volume Measurements by Use of Artificial Neural Network and Ellipsoid Formula.
Lee DK; Sung DJ; Kim CS; Heo Y; Lee JY; Park BJ; Kim MJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jun; 214(6):1229-1238. PubMed ID: 32208009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of semi-automated and manual methods to measure the volume of prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging.
Marin L; Ezziane M; Comperat E; Mozer P; Cancel-Tassin G; Coté JF; Racoceanu D; Boudghene F; Lucidarme O; Cussenot O; Renard Penna R
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 May; 98(5):423-428. PubMed ID: 28330587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Accuracy of prostatic ultrasonography versus MRI in measuring prostate volume].
Hou JL; Ma WL; Dong X; Zhu XY; Zhang Q; Qiu XF; Zhuang JL; Huang HF; Guo HQ; Gan WD
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2022 Oct; 28(10):896-900. PubMed ID: 37838956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. New technique for prostate volume assessment.
Habes M; Bahr J; Schiller T; Kühn JP; Hoppe L; Burchardt M; Hoffmann W
World J Urol; 2014 Dec; 32(6):1559-64. PubMed ID: 24306620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fully automated prostate segmentation on MRI: comparison with manual segmentation methods and specimen volumes.
Turkbey B; Fotin SV; Huang RJ; Yin Y; Daar D; Aras O; Bernardo M; Garvey BE; Weaver J; Haldankar H; Muradyan N; Merino MJ; Pinto PA; Periaswamy S; Choyke PL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):W720-9. PubMed ID: 24147502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of risk factors for determining the need for prostate biopsy in patients with negative MRI.
Liang L; Qi F; Cheng Y; Zhang L; Cao D; Cheng G; Hua L
Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6048. PubMed ID: 33723287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modified prostate volume algorithm improves transrectal US volume estimation in men presenting for prostate brachytherapy.
MacMahon PJ; Kennedy AM; Murphy DT; Maher M; McNicholas MM
Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):273-80. PubMed ID: 19092098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of Prostate Volume and Prostate-specific Antigen Density With the Segmentation Method on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Lin YT; Hung SW; Chiu KY; Chai JW; Lin JC
In Vivo; 2023; 37(2):786-793. PubMed ID: 36881046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
