158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35170358)
1. Impact of Obtaining a Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Spot Compression View on Assessment of Equivocal DBT Findings.
Deleau F; Linck PA; Brouste V; Thomassin-Naggara I; Depetiteville MP; Boisserie-Lacroix M; Chamming's F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jul; 219(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 35170358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Can digital breast tomosynthesis replace conventional diagnostic mammography views for screening recalls without calcifications? A comparison study in a simulated clinical setting.
Brandt KR; Craig DA; Hoskins TL; Henrichsen TL; Bendel EC; Brandt SR; Mandrekar J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Feb; 200(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 23345348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. One view or two views for wide-angle tomosynthesis with synthetic mammography in the assessment setting?
Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Woitek R; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH
Eur Radiol; 2022 Jan; 32(1):661-670. PubMed ID: 34324025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast Cancer Conspicuity on Simultaneously Acquired Digital Mammographic Images versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.
Korhonen KE; Conant EF; Cohen EA; Synnestvedt M; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31084481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Value of contrast-enhanced mammography combined with the Kaiser score for clinical decision-making regarding tomosynthesis BI-RADS 4A lesions.
Rong X; Kang Y; Xue J; Han P; Li Z; Yang G; Shi G
Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7439-7447. PubMed ID: 35639141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of single-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and ultrasound vs. additional views and ultrasound for the assessment of screen-detected abnormalities: German multi-reader study.
Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Hacker A; Jänsch A; Kates R; Wulz-Horber S;
Acta Radiol; 2018 Jul; 59(7):782-788. PubMed ID: 28929783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of GE digital breast tomosynthesis vs supplementary mammographic views for diagnosis of screen-detected soft-tissue breast lesions.
Cornford EJ; Turnbull AE; James JJ; Tsang R; Akram T; Burrell HC; Hamilton LJ; Tennant SL; Bagnall MJ; Puri S; Ball GR; Chen Y; Jones V
Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1058):20150735. PubMed ID: 26559441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Efficacy of Synthesized 2D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Multi-ethnic Malaysian Population.
Mumin NA; Rahmat K; Fadzli F; Ramli MT; Westerhout CJ; Ramli N; Rozalli FI; Ng KH
Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1459. PubMed ID: 30728394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital tomosynthesis spot view in architectural distortions: outcomes in management and radiation dose.
Fiaschetti V; Ubaldi N; De Fazio S; Ricci A; Maspes F; Cossu E
Radiol Med; 2023 Jan; 128(1):35-48. PubMed ID: 36534241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital breast tomosynthesis is comparable to mammographic spot views for mass characterization.
Noroozian M; Hadjiiski L; Rahnama-Moghadam S; Klein KA; Jeffries DO; Pinsky RW; Chan HP; Carson PL; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA
Radiology; 2012 Jan; 262(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 21998048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast percent density: estimation on digital mammograms and central tomosynthesis projections.
Bakic PR; Carton AK; Kontos D; Zhang C; Troxel AB; Maidment AD
Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 19420321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. One-view digital breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone modality for breast cancer detection: do we need more?
Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Gubern-Merida A; Imhof-Tas M; Lardenoije S; Wanders AJT; Andersson I; Zackrisson S; Lång K; Dustler M; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I
Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):1938-1948. PubMed ID: 29230524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection and characterization of breast lesions in a selective diagnostic population: diagnostic accuracy study for comparison between one-view digital breast tomosynthesis and two-view full-field digital mammography.
Chae EY; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150743. PubMed ID: 27072391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. One-to-one comparison between digital spot compression view and digital breast tomosynthesis.
Tagliafico A; Astengo D; Cavagnetto F; Rosasco R; Rescinito G; Monetti F; Calabrese M
Eur Radiol; 2012 Mar; 22(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 21987214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is there any added value to substitute the 2D digital MLO projection for a MLO tomosynthesis projection and its synthetic view when a 2D standard digital mammography is used in a one-stop-shop immediate reading mammography screening?
Mesurolle B; El Khoury M; Travade A; Bagard C; Pétrou A; Monghal C
Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9529-9539. PubMed ID: 34047846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reader performances in breast lesion characterization via DBT: One or two views and which view?
Boisselier A; Mandoul C; Monsonis B; Delebecq J; Millet I; Pages E; Taourel P
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 142():109880. PubMed ID: 34358811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
