198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35170453)
1. Clinicopathological factors associated with pathological upgrading from biopsy to prostatectomy in patients with ISUP grade group ≤2 prostate cancer.
Li X; Wang ZX; Zhu YP; Wang J; Yin YS; Zeng XY
Asian J Androl; 2022; 24(5):487-493. PubMed ID: 35170453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of prostate health index to predict Gleason score upgrading and high-risk prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kim H; Jung G; Kim JH; Byun SS; Hong SK
Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):17447. PubMed ID: 34465825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PI-RADS v2 and periprostatic fat measured on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can predict upgrading in radical prostatectomy pathology amongst patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer.
Zhai L; Fan Y; Sun S; Wang H; Meng Y; Hu S; Wang X; Yu W; Jin J
Scand J Urol; 2018; 52(5-6):333-339. PubMed ID: 30895901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Correlation analysis between prostate imaging report and data system score and pathological results of prostate cancer].
Zhu LY; Ding XF; Huang TB; Luan Y; Guo CH; Xu YZ; Wang F
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 100(34):2663-2668. PubMed ID: 32921014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Impact of Visible Tumor (PI-RADS ≥ 3) on Upgrading and Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Low Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: A Biopsy Core Based Analysis.
Özkan A; Köseoğlu E; Kılıç M; Baydar DE; Sağlıcan Y; Balbay MD; Canda AE; Kordan Y; Kiremit MC; Çil B; Tuğcu V; Bakır B; Esen T
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2022 Feb; 20(1):e61-e67. PubMed ID: 34750082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of PSMA PET/CT to predict upgrading in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for ISUP grade group 1 prostate cancer.
Esen B; Seymen H; Gurses B; Armutlu A; Koseoglu E; Tarim K; Ertoy Baydar D; Sarikaya AF; Canda AE; Balbay D; Kordan Y; Tilki D; Esen T; Demirkol MO
Prostate; 2024 Jan; 84(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 37661579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bioptic intraprostatic chronic inflammation predicts adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy in patients with low-grade prostate cancer.
Sanguedolce F; Falagario UG; Castellan P; Di Nauta M; Silecchia G; Bruno SM; Russo D; Treacy PJ; Tewari AK; Montironi R; Carrieri G; Cormio L
Urol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 38(10):793.e19-793.e25. PubMed ID: 32220548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Establishment and evaluation of a model for predicting ISUP pathological grade≥2 before radical prostatectomy].
Wang YF; Zhang YY; Tan SX; Pan P; Wei CG; Shen JK
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Dec; 101(45):3754-3759. PubMed ID: 34856705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk and predictors of adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy in patients diagnosed with IUSP 1-2 prostate cancer at MRI-targeted biopsy: a multicenter analysis.
Kesch C; Pantea V; Soeterik T; Marquis A; la Bombarda G; Morlacco A; Barletta F; Radtke JP; Darr C; Preisser F; Zattoni F; Marra G; van den Bergh RCN; Hadaschik B; Gandaglia G;
World J Urol; 2023 Feb; 41(2):427-434. PubMed ID: 36534151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The prognostic value of
Zheng A; Wang Z; Luo L; Chang R; Gao J; Wang B; Duan X
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1169189. PubMed ID: 37234988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repeat MRI during active surveillance: natural history of prostatic lesions and upgrading rates.
Luzzago S; Piccinelli ML; Mistretta FA; Bianchi R; Cozzi G; Di Trapani E; Cioffi A; Catellani M; Fontana M; Jannello LMI; Botticelli FMG; Marvaso G; Alessi S; Pricolo P; Ferro M; Matei DV; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Fusco N; Petralia G; de Cobelli O; Musi G
BJU Int; 2022 Apr; 129(4):524-533. PubMed ID: 34687137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel nomogram to identify candidates for active surveillance amongst patients with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) 1 or ISUP GG2 prostate cancer, according to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings.
Luzzago S; de Cobelli O; Cozzi G; Peveri G; Bagnardi V; Catellani M; Di Trapani E; Mistretta FA; Pricolo P; Conti A; Alessi S; Marvaso G; Ferro M; Matei DV; Renne G; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Petralia G; Musi G
BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 32150328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biparametric Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Predict Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.
Takeuchi N; Sakamoto S; Nishiyama A; Horikoshi T; Yamada Y; Iizuka J; Maimaiti M; Imamura Y; Kawamura K; Imamoto T; Komiya A; Ikehara Y; Akakura K; Ichikawa T
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):e817-e829. PubMed ID: 29576444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of Whether Apex or Non-Apex Prostate Cancer Is the Best Candidate for the Use of Prostate-Specific Antigen Density to Predict Pathological Grade Group Upgrading and Upstaging after Radical Prostatectomy.
Huang C; He S; He Q; Gong Y; Song G; Zhou L
J Clin Med; 2023 Feb; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 36836195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The clinical predictive factors and postoperative histopathological parameters associated with upgrading after radical prostatectomy: A contemporary analysis with grade groups.
Erdem S; Verep S; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Prostate; 2020 Feb; 80(2):225-234. PubMed ID: 31794085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Association of MyProstateScore (MPS) with prostate cancer grade in the radical prostatectomy specimen.
Eyrich NW; Wei JT; Niknafs YS; Siddiqui J; Ellimoottil C; Salami SS; Palapattu GS; Mehra R; Kunju LP; Tomlins SA; Chinnaiyan AM; Morgan TM; Tosoian JJ
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):4.e1-4.e7. PubMed ID: 34753659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unified model involving genomics, magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density outperforms individual co-variables at predicting biopsy upgrading in patients on active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer.
Beksac AT; Ratnani P; Dovey Z; Parekh S; Falagario U; Roshandel R; Sobotka S; Kewlani D; Davis A; Weil R; Bashorun H; Jambor I; Lewis S; Haines K; Tewari AK
Cancer Rep (Hoboken); 2022 Mar; 5(3):e1492. PubMed ID: 34931468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance imaging target fusion biopsy vs. transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy - A comparative study of ISUP score upgrading risk in the final radical prostatectomy specimen.
Guimarães T; Gil M; Medeiros M; Andrade V; Guerra J; Pinheiro H; Fernandes F; Pina J; Lopes Dias J; Campos Pinheiro L
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2022 Sep; 94(3):278-284. PubMed ID: 36165470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical significance and risk factors of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade upgrading in prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Takeshima Y; Yamada Y; Teshima T; Fujimura T; Kakutani S; Hakozaki Y; Kimura N; Akiyama Y; Sato Y; Kawai T; Yamada D; Kume H
BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):501. PubMed ID: 33947348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percentage Gleason pattern 4 and PI-RADS score predict upgrading in biopsy Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients without cribriform pattern.
van der Slot MA; Seyrek N; Kweldam CF; den Bakker MA; Busstra MB; Gan M; Klaver S; Rietbergen JBW; van Leenders GJLH
World J Urol; 2022 Nov; 40(11):2723-2729. PubMed ID: 36190529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
