These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35171003)

  • 1. Simulated Capped Application Process for Urology Applicants. Letter.
    Weissbart SJ; Stock JA
    J Urol; 2022 May; 207(5):1164-1165. PubMed ID: 35171003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simulated Capped Application Process for Urology Applicants.
    Friedman DT; Feustel PJ; Kogan BA
    J Urol; 2022 Feb; 207(2):271-273. PubMed ID: 34747635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Presence of Gender Bias in Letters of Recommendations Written for Urology Residency Applicants.
    Filippou P; Mahajan S; Deal A; Wallen EM; Tan HJ; Pruthi RS; Smith AB
    Urology; 2019 Dec; 134():56-61. PubMed ID: 31491451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The COVID-19 Residency Application Cycle Did Not Affect Geographic Dispersal Patterns Among Applicants Entering the Urology Match: A Quantitative Mapping Study.
    Gabrielson AT; Meilchen CK; Kohn JR; Kohn TP
    Urology; 2021 Dec; 158():26-32. PubMed ID: 34324912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Virtual Urology Residency Match Process: Moving Beyond the Pandemic.
    Carpinito GP; Khouri RK; Kenigsberg AP; Ganesan V; Kuprasertkul A; Caldwell KM; Hudak SJ; Lemack GE
    Urology; 2021 Dec; 158():33-38. PubMed ID: 34280439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resume fraud: unverifiable publications of urology training program applicants.
    Nosnik IP; Friedmann P; Nagler HM; Dinlenc CZ
    J Urol; 2010 Apr; 183(4):1520-3. PubMed ID: 20171693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender-Based Differences in Urology Residency Applicant Personal Statements.
    Demzik A; Filippou P; Chew C; Deal A; Mercer E; Mahajan S; Wallen EM; Tan HJ; Smith AB
    Urology; 2021 Apr; 150():2-8. PubMed ID: 33035562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating Urology Residency Applications: What Matters Most and What Comes Next?
    Huang MM; Clifton MM
    Curr Urol Rep; 2020 Aug; 21(10):37. PubMed ID: 32803400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Publication misrepresentation among urology residency applicants.
    Hsi RS; Hotaling JM; Moore TN; Joyner BD
    World J Urol; 2013 Jun; 31(3):697-702. PubMed ID: 22729465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Twitter and Instagram Use in the Urology Residency Application Process.
    Carpinito GP; Caldwell KM; Kenigsberg AP; Ganesan V; Khouri RK; Kuprasertkul A; Hudak SJ; Lemack GE
    Urology; 2022 Jan; 159():22-27. PubMed ID: 34637837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Financial Burden of Applying to Urology Residency in 2020.
    Tabakin AL; Srivastava A; Polotti CF; Gupta NK
    Urology; 2021 Aug; 154():62-67. PubMed ID: 33476604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterizing Standardized Letters of Recommendation in Urology Residency Applications.
    Nabavizadeh B; Hakam N; Sadighian MJ; Holler JT; Amend GM; Hampson LA; Penson DF; Breyer BN
    Urology; 2021 Dec; 158():18-25. PubMed ID: 34547345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Survey of Applicant Experience and Cost in the Urology Match: Opportunities for Reform.
    Nikonow TN; Lyon TD; Jackman SV; Averch TD
    J Urol; 2015 Oct; 194(4):1063-7. PubMed ID: 25912495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving the Residency Program Virtual Open House Experience: A Survey of Urology Applicants.
    Jiang J; Key P; Deibert CM
    Urology; 2020 Dec; 146():1-3. PubMed ID: 33049230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of residency match information disseminated by a third-party website.
    Kutikov A; Morgan TM; Resnick MJ
    J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 19896626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reversing the Decline in Urology Residency Applications: An Analysis of Medical School Factors Critical to Maintaining Student Interest.
    Wong D; Ganesan V; Kuprasertkul I; Khouri RK; Lemack GE
    Urology; 2020 Feb; 136():51-57. PubMed ID: 31785279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How Much Is Not Enough? Contextualizing Recent Trends in the Urology Residency Match.
    Koo K; Cone EB
    Urology; 2020 May; 139():215. PubMed ID: 32044262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Capturing the Perspective of Prospective Urology Applicants: Impacts of COVID-19 on Medical Education.
    Hanson KA; Borofsky MS; Hampson LA; Breyer BN; Kern NG; Conti SL; Kielb SJ; Sorensen MD
    Urology; 2020 Dec; 146():36-42. PubMed ID: 33007312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Financial and educational costs of the residency interview process for urology applicants.
    Kerfoot BP; Asher KP; McCullough DL
    Urology; 2008 Jun; 71(6):990-4. PubMed ID: 18295310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends in matching to urology residency in Canada: are we becoming noncompetitive?
    Melnyk M; Nelson H; Mickelson J; Macneily AE
    J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(4):537-43. PubMed ID: 23725943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.