258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35171331)
1. Repeatability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer and agreement with other three optical biometers.
Cheng SM; Zhang JS; Shao X; Wu ZT; Li TT; Wang P; Lin JH; Yu AY
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Jul; 260(7):2271-2281. PubMed ID: 35171331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Agreement between Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometers and a Partial Coherence Interferometer.
Moon JY; Cho SC; Kim HJ; Jun RM; Han KE
Korean J Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug; 36(4):326-337. PubMed ID: 35766049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of ocular biometric measurements in patients with cataract using three swept-source optical coherence tomography devices.
Oh R; Oh JY; Choi HJ; Kim MK; Yoon CH
BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):62. PubMed ID: 33504333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Agreement between 2 swept-source OCT biometers and a Scheimpflug partial coherence interferometer.
Tañá-Rivero P; Aguilar-Córcoles S; Tello-Elordi C; Pastor-Pascual F; Montés-Micó R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Apr; 47(4):488-495. PubMed ID: 33252569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Repeatability and agreement of ocular biometry measurements: Aladdin versus Lenstar.
McAlinden C; Gao R; Yu A; Wang X; Yang J; Yu Y; Chen H; Wang Q; Huang J
Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Sep; 101(9):1223-1229. PubMed ID: 28130351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.
Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Loket S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 26703299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repeatability of biometry measured by three devices and its impact on predicted intraocular lens power.
Shetty N; Kaweri L; Koshy A; Shetty R; Nuijts RMMA; Sinha Roy A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 May; 47(5):585-592. PubMed ID: 33252565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of two optical biometry devices: high wavelength swept source OCT versus partial coherence interferometry.
Szalai E; Csutak A
Int Ophthalmol; 2022 Feb; 42(2):627-634. PubMed ID: 34633606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability and comparability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer in optical biometry.
Monera Lucas CE; Escolano Serrano J; Tarazona Jaimes C; Romero Valero D; Moya Martínez A; Martínez Toldos JJ
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed); 2022 Dec; 97(12):670-675. PubMed ID: 36068133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of refractive outcomes obtained with two swept-source OCT-based optical biometers after cataract surgery: A study of 152 eyes.
Agard E; Levron A; Billant J; Douma I; Dot C
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2024 Jun; 47(6):104186. PubMed ID: 38663226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements.
Sel S; Stange J; Kaiser D; Kiraly L
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):318-322. PubMed ID: 28342729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The repeatability and agreement of biometric measurements by dual Scheimpflug device with integrated optical biometer.
Hashemi H; Sardari S; Yekta A; Khabazkhoob M
Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):7748. PubMed ID: 35546610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Agreement of intraocular lens power calculation between 2 SS-OCT-based biometers.
Pfaeffli OA; Weber A; Hoffer KJ; Savini G; Baenninger PB; Thiel MA; Taroni L; Müller L
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 May; 48(5):535-541. PubMed ID: 34417784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Agreement of predicted intraocular lens power using swept-source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry.
Tañá-Sanz P; Rodríguez-Carrillo MD; Ruiz-Santos M; Montés-Micó R; Ruiz-Mesa R; Tañá-Rivero P
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2021 Dec; 18(12):1219-1234. PubMed ID: 34806515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
Arriola-Villalobos P; Almendral-Gómez J; Garzón N; Ruiz-Medrano J; Fernández-Pérez C; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM; Díaz-Valle D
Eye (Lond); 2017 Mar; 31(3):437-442. PubMed ID: 27834962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Two Optical Biometers.
Shin MC; Chung SY; Hwang HS; Han KE
Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 93(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 26760579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeatability and reproducibility of a new fully automatic measurement optical low coherence reflectometry biometer and agreement with swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer.
Yu J; Zhao G; Lei CS; Wan T; Ning R; Xing W; Ma X; Pan H; Savini G; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Zhou X; Huang J
Br J Ophthalmol; 2024 May; 108(5):673-678. PubMed ID: 37142332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters obtained by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer compared to the IOLMaster in healthy eyes.
Hua Y; Qiu W; Xiao Q; Wu Q
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0193023. PubMed ID: 29486009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of 6 biometers based on different optical technologies.
Montés-Micó R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2022 Jan; 48(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 34091551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biometry and intraocular power calculation using a swept-source optical coherence tomography: A repeatability and agreement study.
Hashemi H; Miraftab M; Panahi P; Asgari S
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug; 70(8):2845-2850. PubMed ID: 35918927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
