These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35171453)
1. A simplified protocol for the detection of blood, saliva, and semen from a single biological trace using immunochromatographic tests. Basset P; Blandin P; Grini A; Delemont S; Samie L; Castella V Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2022 Jun; 18(2):141-148. PubMed ID: 35171453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recovery of DNA from SERATEC Conte J; Ruddy A; Domonoski L; Shanahan A; Daley N; McDevitt C; Roca G J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1176-1183. PubMed ID: 35182073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of Blood and Semen Detection and DNA Collection from Swabs up to Three Months after Deposition on Five Different Cloth Materials. Medina-Paz F; Kuba B; Kryvorutsky E; Roca G; Zapico SC Int J Mol Sci; 2024 Mar; 25(6):. PubMed ID: 38542494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening biological stains with qPCR versus lateral flow immunochromatographic test strips: a quantitative comparison using analytical figures of merit. Oechsle CS; Haddad S; Sgueglia JB; Grgicak CM J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jan; 59(1):199-207. PubMed ID: 24117798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct-STR typing from presumptively-tested and untreated body fluids. Thanakiatkrai P; Raham K; Pradutkanchana J; Sotthibandhu S; Kitpipit T Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Sep; 30():1-9. PubMed ID: 28605649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comprehensive study into false positive rates for 'other' biological samples using common presumptive testing methods. Stroud A; Gamblin A; Birchall P; Harbison S; Opperman S Sci Justice; 2023 May; 63(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 37169467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The detection of blood, semen and saliva through fabrics: A pilot study. Beveridge T; Szkuta B; van Oorschot RAH; Durdle A Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Aug; 361():112153. PubMed ID: 39029141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of body fluid identification and DNA profiling after exposure to tropical weather conditions. Zapico SC; Stadler C; Roca G J Forensic Sci; 2024 Mar; 69(2):631-639. PubMed ID: 38146797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving body fluid identification in forensic trace evidence-construction of an immunochromatographic test array to rapidly detect up to five body fluids simultaneously. Holtkötter H; Schwender K; Wiegand P; Peiffer H; Vennemann M Int J Legal Med; 2018 Jan; 132(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 29082429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of infrared radiation, solar radiation, and burial exposure on the efficacy of forensic immunoassay testing for blood, semen, and saliva. Kirchner CL; Conlan XA; Durdle A Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Aug; 361():112106. PubMed ID: 38924941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Developmental validation of RSID-saliva: a lateral flow immunochromatographic strip test for the forensic detection of saliva. Old JB; Schweers BA; Boonlayangoor PW; Reich KA J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jul; 54(4):866-73. PubMed ID: 19486436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Developmental validation of RSID™-Semen: a lateral flow immunochromatographic strip test for the forensic detection of human semen. Old J; Schweers BA; Boonlayangoor PW; Fischer B; Miller KW; Reich K J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):489-99. PubMed ID: 22211796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of ABAcard(®) p30 and RSID™-Semen test kits for forensic semen identification. Boward ES; Wilson SL J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Nov; 20(8):1126-30. PubMed ID: 24237835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. DNA methylation profiling for a confirmatory test for blood, saliva, semen, vaginal fluid and menstrual blood. Lee HY; Jung SE; Lee EH; Yang WI; Shin KJ Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Sep; 24():75-82. PubMed ID: 27344518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of forensic tests to distinguish blowfly artifacts from human blood, semen, and saliva. Durdle A; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA J Forensic Sci; 2015 Mar; 60(2):468-70. PubMed ID: 25407611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the background levels of body fluids on hands. Douglas H; Fraser I; Davidson G; Murphy C; Gorman ML; Boyce M; Doole S Sci Justice; 2023 Jul; 63(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 37453781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acid phosphatase test on Phadebas Herman Y; Feine I; Gafny R Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():218-222. PubMed ID: 29775922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Specificity, sensitivity, and operability of RSID™-urine for forensic identification of urine: comparison with ELISA for Tamm-Horsfall protein. Akutsu T; Watanabe K; Sakurada K J Forensic Sci; 2012 Nov; 57(6):1570-3. PubMed ID: 22563762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of semen presumptive tests for use at crime scenes. Laffan A; Sawyer I; Quinones I; Daniel B Med Sci Law; 2011 Jan; 51(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 21595415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The human DNA content in artifacts deposited by the blowfly Lucilia cuprina fed human blood, semen and saliva. Durdle A; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Dec; 233(1-3):212-9. PubMed ID: 24314522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]