119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35171824)
1. Effect of facility volume on giant pituitary adenoma neurosurgical outcomes.
Chalif EJ; Couldwell WT; Aghi MK
J Neurosurg; 2022 Sep; 137(3):658-667. PubMed ID: 35171824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pituitary adenoma in the elderly: surgical outcomes and treatment trends in the United States.
Chalif EJ; Morshed RA; Young JS; Haddad AF; Jain S; Aghi MK
J Neurosurg; 2022 Dec; 137(6):1687-1698. PubMed ID: 35535847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endoscopic versus nonendoscopic surgery for resection of pituitary adenomas: a national database study.
Goshtasbi K; Lehrich BM; Abouzari M; Abiri A; Birkenbeuel J; Lan MY; Wang WH; Cadena G; Hsu FPK; Kuan EC
J Neurosurg; 2020 Mar; 134(3):816-824. PubMed ID: 32168478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neurosurgical Outcomes for Pediatric Central Nervous System Tumors in the United States.
Chalif EJ; Morshed RA; Oh T; Dalle Ore C; Aghi MK; Gupta N
Neurosurgery; 2023 Feb; 92(2):407-420. PubMed ID: 36637275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved survival of glioblastoma patients treated at academic and high-volume facilities: a hospital-based study from the National Cancer Database.
Zhu P; Du XL; Zhu JJ; Esquenazi Y
J Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 132(2):491-502. PubMed ID: 30771780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of facility type and volume in low-grade glioma outcomes.
Zhu P; Du XL; Blanco AI; Ballester LY; Tandon N; Berger MS; Zhu JJ; Esquenazi Y
J Neurosurg; 2019 Sep; 133(5):1313-1323. PubMed ID: 31561219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors Associated with and Temporal Trends in the Use of Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Pituitary Adenoma in the National Cancer Database.
Fathy R; Kuan E; Lee JYK; Grady MS; Alonso-Basanta M; Palmer JN; Adappa ND; O'Malley BW; Brant J
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base; 2021 Jun; 82(3):285-294. PubMed ID: 34026404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to large and giant pituitary adenomas: institutional experience and predictors of extent of resection.
Juraschka K; Khan OH; Godoy BL; Monsalves E; Kilian A; Krischek B; Ghare A; Vescan A; Gentili F; Zadeh G
J Neurosurg; 2014 Jul; 121(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 24785323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transsphenoidal Surgery of Giant Pituitary Adenoma: Results and Experience of 239 Cases in A Single Center.
Chen Y; Xu X; Cao J; Jie Y; Wang L; Cai F; Chen S; Yan W; Hong Y; Zhang J; Wu Q
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():879702. PubMed ID: 35600598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors in patients undergoing pituitary surgery.
Shahrestani S; Ballatori AM; Chen XT; Ton A; Strickland BA; Brunswick A; Zada G
J Neurosurg; 2020 Jun; 134(6):1816-1823. PubMed ID: 32534499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Facility volume and postoperative outcomes for malignant pleural mesothelioma: A National Cancer Data Base analysis.
Verma V; Ahern CA; Berlind CG; Lindsay WD; Grover S; Culligan MJ; Friedberg JS; Simone CB
Lung Cancer; 2018 Jun; 120():7-13. PubMed ID: 29748018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sources of residuals after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for large and giant pituitary adenomas.
Peto I; Abou-Al-Shaar H; White TG; Abunimer AM; Kwan K; Zavadskiy G; Wagner K; Black K; Eisenberg M; Bruni M; Dehdashti AR
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2020 Oct; 162(10):2341-2351. PubMed ID: 32700080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Large and giant pituitary adenoma resection by microscopic trans-sphenoidal surgery: Surgical outcomes and complications in 123 consecutive patients.
Karki M; Sun J; Yadav CP; Zhao B
J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 44():310-314. PubMed ID: 28778803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical Outcome of Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery of Large and Giant Pituitary Adenomas: An Institutional Experience from the Middle East.
Fallah N; Taghvaei M; Sadaghiani S; Sadrhosseini SM; Esfahanian F; Zeinalizadeh M
World Neurosurg; 2019 Dec; 132():e802-e811. PubMed ID: 31404693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endoscopic approach for giant pituitary adenoma: clinical outcomes of 205 patients and comparison of two proposed classification systems for preoperative prediction of extent of resection.
Ceylan S; Sen HE; Ozsoy B; Ceylan EC; Ergen A; Selek A; Anik Y; Balci S; Cabuk B; Anik I
J Neurosurg; 2022 Mar; 136(3):786-800. PubMed ID: 34534953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes and surgical nuances in management of giant pituitary adenomas: a review of 108 cases in the endoscopic era.
Makarenko S; Alzahrani I; Karsy M; Deopujari C; Couldwell WT
J Neurosurg; 2022 Sep; 137(3):635-646. PubMed ID: 35061979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Giant pituitary adenomas: surgical outcomes of 50 cases operated on by the endonasal endoscopic approach.
Gondim JA; Almeida JP; Albuquerque LA; Gomes EF; Schops M
World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(1-2):e281-90. PubMed ID: 23994073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of treating facilities' type and volume in patients with major salivary gland cancer.
Bollig CA; Zitsch RP
Laryngoscope; 2019 Oct; 129(10):2321-2327. PubMed ID: 30698823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical characteristics and outcomes in elderly patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma.
Pereira MP; Oh T; Joshi RS; Haddad AF; Pereira KM; Osorio RC; Donohue KC; Peeran Z; Sudhir S; Jain S; Beniwal A; Gurrola J; El-Sayed IH; Blevins LS; Theodosopoulos PV; Kunwar S; Aghi MK
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Oct; 49(4):E19. PubMed ID: 33002877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and clinical validation of a grading system for pituitary adenoma consistency.
Rutkowski MJ; Chang KE; Cardinal T; Du R; Tafreshi AR; Donoho DA; Brunswick A; Micko A; Liu CJ; Shiroishi MS; Carmichael JD; Zada G
J Neurosurg; 2020 Jun; 134(6):1800-1807. PubMed ID: 32503003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
