124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35172282)
21. Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.
Zaghian M; Cao W; Liu W; Kardar L; Randeniya S; Mohan R; Lim G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):15-25. PubMed ID: 28300378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Feasibility and robustness of dose painting by numbers in proton therapy with contour-driven plan optimization.
Barragán AM; Differding S; Janssens G; Lee JA; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2006-17. PubMed ID: 25832091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of spot reduction on the effectiveness of rescanning in pencil beam scanned proton therapy for mobile tumours.
Bertschi S; Krieger M; Weber DC; Lomax AJ; van de Water S
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Nov; 67(21):. PubMed ID: 36179702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Volumetric arc intensity-modulated therapy for spine body radiotherapy: comparison with static intensity-modulated treatment.
Wu QJ; Yoo S; Kirkpatrick JP; Thongphiew D; Yin FF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Dec; 75(5):1596-604. PubMed ID: 19733447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Strategies for Motion Robust Proton Therapy With Pencil Beam Scanning for Esophageal Cancer.
Møller DS; Poulsen PR; Hagner A; Dufour M; Nordsmark M; Nyeng TB; Mortensen HR; Lutz CM; Hoffmann L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2021 Oct; 111(2):539-548. PubMed ID: 33974885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dosimetric study of uniform scanning proton therapy planning for prostate cancer patients with a metal hip prosthesis, and comparison with volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Rana S; Cheng C; Zheng Y; Hsi W; Zeidan O; Schreuder N; Vargas C; Larson G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 May; 15(3):4611. PubMed ID: 24892333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Robust optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy with soft spot sensitivity regularization.
Gu W; Ruan D; O'Connor D; Zou W; Dong L; Tsai MY; Jia X; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1408-1425. PubMed ID: 30570164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Efficient proton arc optimization and delivery through energy layer pre-selection and post-filtering.
Wuyckens S; Wase V; Marthin O; Sundström J; Janssens G; Borderias-Villarroel E; Souris K; Sterpin E; Engwall E; Lee JA
Med Phys; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38742774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Minimum-MU and sparse-energy-layer (MMSEL) constrained inverse optimization method for efficiently deliverable PBS plans.
Lin Y; Clasie B; Liu T; McDonald M; Langen KM; Gao H
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 64(20):205001. PubMed ID: 31530746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Linear Energy Transfer Incorporated Spot-Scanning Proton Arc Therapy Optimization: A Feasibility Study.
Li X; Ding X; Zheng W; Liu G; Janssens G; Souris K; Barragán-Montero AM; Yan D; Stevens C; Kabolizadeh P
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():698537. PubMed ID: 34327139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.
Tran A; Zhang J; Woods K; Yu V; Nguyen D; Gustafson G; Rosen L; Sheng K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 28077128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Investigating volumetric repainting to mitigate interplay effect on 4D robustly optimized lung cancer plans in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Rana S; Rosenfeld AB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 22(3):107-118. PubMed ID: 33599391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of intrafraction prostate motion on proton pencil beam scanning delivery: a quantitative assessment.
Tang S; Deville C; McDonough J; Tochner Z; Wang KK; Vapiwala N; Both S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Oct; 87(2):375-82. PubMed ID: 23958148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of Spot Size and Beam-Shaping Devices on the Treatment Plan Quality for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.
Moteabbed M; Yock TI; Depauw N; Madden TM; Kooy HM; Paganetti H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):190-198. PubMed ID: 27084640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. FLASH Radiotherapy Using Single-Energy Proton PBS Transmission Beams for Hypofractionation Liver Cancer: Dose and Dose Rate Quantification.
Wei S; Lin H; Choi JI; Press RH; Lazarev S; Kabarriti R; Hajj C; Hasan S; Chhabra AM; Simone CB; Kang M
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():813063. PubMed ID: 35096620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improve dosimetric outcome in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy.
Li X; Kabolizadeh P; Yan D; Qin A; Zhou J; Hong Y; Guerrero T; Grills I; Stevens C; Ding X
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Feb; 13(1):35. PubMed ID: 29486782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of robust treatment planning on single- and multi-field optimized plans for proton beam therapy of unilateral head and neck target volumes.
Cubillos-Mesías M; Baumann M; Troost EGC; Lohaus F; Löck S; Richter C; Stützer K
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Nov; 12(1):190. PubMed ID: 29183377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Performance evaluation of adaptive aperture's static and dynamic collimation in a compact pencil beam scanning proton therapy system: A dosimetric comparison study for multiple disease sites.
Grewal HS; Ahmad S; Jin H
Med Dosim; 2021 Summer; 46(2):179-187. PubMed ID: 33279369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of spot parameters in pencil beam scanning treatment planning.
Kraan AC; Depauw N; Clasie B; Giunta M; Madden T; Kooy HM
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):60-73. PubMed ID: 29148575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
