These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3517260)

  • 1. Viability of the retained bone core in the core-vent dental implant.
    Lum LB; Beirne OR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1986 May; 44(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 3517260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of functional use of endosseous dental implants on the tissue-implant interface. I. Histological aspects.
    Brunski JB; Moccia AF; Pollack SR; Korostoff E; Trachtenberg DI
    J Dent Res; 1979 Oct; 58(10):1953-69. PubMed ID: 291620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a new dense-porous hydroxylapatite endosteal dental implant.
    Hosaka N; Nagata T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1987 Jul; 45(7):583-93. PubMed ID: 3037050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A histological assessment of the initial healing response adjacent to porous-surfaced, titanium alloy dental implants in dogs.
    Deporter DA; Watson PA; Pilliar RM; Melcher AH; Winslow J; Howley TP; Hansel P; Maniatopoulos C; Rodriguez A; Abdulla D
    J Dent Res; 1986 Aug; 65(8):1064-70. PubMed ID: 3525627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical, radiographical, and histological evaluation of porous rooted polymethylmethacrylate dental implants.
    Peterson LJ; Pennel BM; McKinney RV; Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM
    J Dent Res; 1979 Jan; 58(1):489-96. PubMed ID: 282305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some advances in endosseous implants.
    Lavelle CL; Wedgwood D; Love WB
    J Oral Rehabil; 1981 Jun; 8(4):319-31. PubMed ID: 7024488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surface energy effects of implant biomaterials on the implant-tissue interface: implications for the rate, character and quality of post-surgical healing.
    Dorfman JD
    J Oral Implantol; 1986; 12(4):661-72. PubMed ID: 3467069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of hydroxylapatite-coated titanium dental implants in dogs.
    Block MS; Kent JN; Kay JF
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1987 Jul; 45(7):601-7. PubMed ID: 3037051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of functional use of endosseous dental implants on the tissue-implant interface. II. Clinical aspects.
    Brunski JB; Moccia AF; Pollack SR; Korostoff E; Trachtenberg DI
    J Dent Res; 1979 Oct; 58(10):1970-80. PubMed ID: 291621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The anchor endosteal implant.
    Cranin AN
    Dent Clin North Am; 1980 Jul; 24(3):505-19. PubMed ID: 6995179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term study of hydroxylapatite implants in canine alveolar bone.
    Boyne PJ; Rothstein SS; Gumaer KI; Drobeck HP
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1984 Sep; 42(9):589-94. PubMed ID: 6088739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The osteofibrous implant. I].
    Muratori G
    Dent Cadmos; 1985 Jun; 53(11):109-12, 115. PubMed ID: 3912211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II. Histologic analysis.
    Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
    J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):933-49. PubMed ID: 9358360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tissue integration of dental endosseous implants: description and comparative analysis of the fibro-osseous integration and osseous integration systems.
    Weiss CM
    J Oral Implantol; 1986; 12(2):169-214. PubMed ID: 3519994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implant-induced expansion of atrophic ridges for the placement of implants.
    Cruz M; Reis CC; Mattos FF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 11319535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Histological and histomorphometrical analysis of bioactive glass and fibre reinforced bioactive glass dental root implants.
    Schepers E; De Clercq M; Ducheyne P
    J Oral Rehabil; 1988 Sep; 15(5):473-87. PubMed ID: 3072394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histologic observations of bone remodeling adjacent to endosteal dental implants.
    Steflik DE; Noel C; McBrayer C; Lake FT; Parr GR; Sisk AL; Hanes PJ
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(2):96-106. PubMed ID: 8699510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study of the bone healing kinetics of plateau versus screw root design titanium dental implants.
    Leonard G; Coelho P; Polyzois I; Stassen L; Claffey N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):232-9. PubMed ID: 19397634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 (rhOP-1) placed with dental implants in fresh extraction sites.
    Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Rueger DC
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 8699520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of a machined collar on crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a histometric study in the canine mandible.
    Hermann JS; Jones AA; Bakaeen LG; Buser D; Schoolfield JD; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2011 Sep; 82(9):1329-38. PubMed ID: 21486176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.