These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35174464)

  • 21. Conflict-frequency affects flanker interference: role of stimulus-ensemble-specific practiceand flanker-response contingencies.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 19289363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acute psychological stress promotes general alertness and attentional control processes: An ERP study.
    Qi M; Gao H
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Apr; 57(4):e13521. PubMed ID: 31898811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Diffusion Model Analysis of Object-Based Selective Attention in the Eriksen Flanker Task.
    Kelber P; Gierlich M; Göth J; Jeschke MG; Mackenzie IG; Mittelstädt V
    Exp Psychol; 2023 May; 70(3):155-170. PubMed ID: 37830767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attentional biases and memory for emotional stimuli in men and male rhesus monkeys.
    Lacreuse A; Schatz K; Strazzullo S; King HM; Ready R
    Anim Cogn; 2013 Nov; 16(6):861-71. PubMed ID: 23463380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of working memory load on visual selective attention: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Pratt N; Willoughby A; Swick D
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2011; 5():57. PubMed ID: 21716633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bottom-Up and Top-Down Factors Differentially Influence Stimulus Representations Across Large-Scale Attentional Networks.
    Long NM; Kuhl BA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 38(10):2495-2504. PubMed ID: 29437930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attentional modulation of emotional conflict processing with flanker tasks.
    Zhou P; Liu X
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e60548. PubMed ID: 23544155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attentional bias during emotional processing: evidence from an emotional flanker task using IAPS.
    Parra MA; Sánchez MG; Valencia S; Trujillo N
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Mar; 32(2):275-285. PubMed ID: 28288533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Stimulus roving and flankers affect perceptual learning of contrast discrimination in Macaca mulatta.
    Chen X; Sanayei M; Thiele A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e109604. PubMed ID: 25340335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Conflicting rewards: effects of task goals on attention for alcohol cues.
    Godara M; Van Bockstaele B; Wiers RW
    Cogn Emot; 2020 Jun; 34(4):643-655. PubMed ID: 31509067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Top-down modulation of lateral interactions in early vision: does attention affect integration of the whole or just perception of the parts?
    Freeman E; Driver J; Sagi D; Zhaoping L
    Curr Biol; 2003 May; 13(11):985-9. PubMed ID: 12781139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A flanker effect for moving visual stimuli.
    Lange-Malecki B; Treue S
    Vision Res; 2012 Jun; 62():134-8. PubMed ID: 22811985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Monetary reward increases attentional effort in the flanker task.
    Hübner R; Schlösser J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Dec; 17(6):821-6. PubMed ID: 21169575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evidence for selective target processing with a low perceptual load flankers task.
    Paquet L; Craig GL
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Mar; 25(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 9099070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. When the ignored gets bound: sequential effects in the flanker task.
    Davelaar EJ
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():552. PubMed ID: 23293616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Acute alcohol effects on attentional bias are mediated by subcortical areas associated with arousal and salience attribution.
    Nikolaou K; Field M; Critchley H; Duka T
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2013 Jun; 38(7):1365-73. PubMed ID: 23361162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Top-Down Processes Override Bottom-Up Interference in the Flanker Task.
    Avital-Cohen R; Tsal Y
    Psychol Sci; 2016 May; 27(5):651-8. PubMed ID: 26993739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Getting it right from the start: Attentional control settings without a history of target selection.
    Giammarco M; Plater L; Hryciw J; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):133-141. PubMed ID: 33241529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attentional capture by alcohol-related stimuli may be activated involuntarily by top-down search goals.
    Brown CRH; Duka T; Forster S
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2018 Jul; 235(7):2087-2099. PubMed ID: 29696310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reward history impacts attentional orienting and inhibitory control on untrained tasks.
    Meyer KN; Sheridan MA; Hopfinger JB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Nov; 82(8):3842-3862. PubMed ID: 32935290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.