177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35175090)
1. Effects of associative inference on individuals' susceptibility to misinformation.
Xiong A; Lee S; Seo H; Lee D
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2023 Mar; 29(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 35175090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.
Giotakos O
Psychiatriki; 2022 Sep; 33(3):183-186. PubMed ID: 35947862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fake news reminders and veracity labels differentially benefit memory and belief accuracy for news headlines.
Kemp PL; Loaiza VM; Wahlheim CN
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21829. PubMed ID: 36528666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determinants of individuals' belief in fake news: A scoping review determinants of belief in fake news.
Bryanov K; Vziatysheva V
PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0253717. PubMed ID: 34166478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recalling fake news during real news corrections can impair or enhance memory updating: the role of recollection-based retrieval.
Kemp PL; Alexander TR; Wahlheim CN
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Sep; 7(1):85. PubMed ID: 36114359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term effectiveness of inoculation against misinformation: Three longitudinal experiments.
Maertens R; Roozenbeek J; Basol M; van der Linden S
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Mar; 27(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 33017160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Misinformation and Morality: Encountering Fake-News Headlines Makes Them Seem Less Unethical to Publish and Share.
Effron DA; Raj M
Psychol Sci; 2020 Jan; 31(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 31751517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An initial accuracy focus reduces the effect of prior exposure on perceived accuracy of news headlines.
Calvillo DP; Smelter TJ
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Nov; 5(1):55. PubMed ID: 33151449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Psychology of Fake News.
Pennycook G; Rand DG
Trends Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 25(5):388-402. PubMed ID: 33736957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of analytical reasoning and source credibility on the evaluation of real and fake full-length news articles.
Pehlivanoglu D; Lin T; Deceus F; Heemskerk A; Ebner NC; Cahill BS
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Mar; 6(1):24. PubMed ID: 33788040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning.
Pennycook G; Rand DG
Cognition; 2019 Jul; 188():39-50. PubMed ID: 29935897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Is Necessary for Normal Associative Inference and Memory Integration.
Spalding KN; Schlichting ML; Zeithamova D; Preston AR; Tranel D; Duff MC; Warren DE
J Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 38(15):3767-3775. PubMed ID: 29555854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How Can Psychological Science Help Counter the Spread of Fake News?
van der Linden S; Roozenbeek J; Maertens R; Basol M; Kácha O; Rathje S; Traberg CS
Span J Psychol; 2021 Apr; 24():e25. PubMed ID: 33840397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Signal Detection Approach to Understanding the Identification of Fake News.
Batailler C; Brannon SM; Teas PE; Gawronski B
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2022 Jan; 17(1):78-98. PubMed ID: 34264150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Memory and belief updating following complete and partial reminders of fake news.
Kemp PL; Sinclair AH; Adcock RA; Wahlheim CN
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 May; 9(1):28. PubMed ID: 38713308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news.
Pennycook G; Cannon TD; Rand DG
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Dec; 147(12):1865-1880. PubMed ID: 30247057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The recombined memory: associative inference in Alzheimer's disease.
El Haj M; Moustafa AA; Robin F; Chapelet G
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2023 May; 35(5):1005-1013. PubMed ID: 36853506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantifying the effects of fake news on behavior: Evidence from a study of COVID-19 misinformation.
Greene CM; Murphy G
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Dec; 27(4):773-784. PubMed ID: 34110860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking.
Pennycook G; Rand DG
J Pers; 2020 Apr; 88(2):185-200. PubMed ID: 30929263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines.
Bago B; Rand DG; Pennycook G
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Aug; 149(8):1608-1613. PubMed ID: 31916834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
