177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35175090)
41. Push polls increase false memories for fake news stories.
Murphy G; Lynch L; Loftus E; Egan R
Memory; 2021 Jul; 29(6):693-707. PubMed ID: 34080495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Ingraining Polio Vaccine Acceptance through Public Service Advertisements in the Digital Era: The Moderating Role of Misinformation, Disinformation, Fake News, and Religious Fatalism.
Jin Q; Raza SH; Yousaf M; Munawar R; Shah AA; Hassan S; Shaikh RS; Ogadimma EC
Vaccines (Basel); 2022 Oct; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 36298598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Time pressure reduces misinformation discrimination ability but does not alter response bias.
Sultan M; Tump AN; Geers M; Lorenz-Spreen P; Herzog SM; Kurvers RHJM
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):22416. PubMed ID: 36575232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Gamified inoculation interventions do not improve discrimination between true and fake news: Reanalyzing existing research with receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Modirrousta-Galian A; Higham PA
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Sep; 152(9):2411-2437. PubMed ID: 36996156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. A prosocial fake news intervention with durable effects.
Orosz G; Paskuj B; Faragó L; Krekó P
Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):3958. PubMed ID: 36894602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. False memories, false preferences: Flexible retrieval mechanisms supporting successful inference bias novel decisions.
Carpenter AC; Schacter DL
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Jul; 147(7):988-1004. PubMed ID: 29419307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Associative interference in older and younger adults.
Burton RL; Lek I; Dixon RA; Caplan JB
Psychol Aging; 2019 Jun; 34(4):558-571. PubMed ID: 31094536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Misinformation vs. Situational Awareness: The Art of Deception and the Need for Cross-Domain Detection.
Xarhoulacos CG; Anagnostopoulou A; Stergiopoulos G; Gritzalis D
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Aug; 21(16):. PubMed ID: 34450937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Fool me twice: how effective is debriefing in false memory studies?
Murphy G; Loftus E; Grady RH; Levine LJ; Greene CM
Memory; 2020 Aug; 28(7):938-949. PubMed ID: 32762497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A short review on susceptibility to falling for fake political news.
Sindermann C; Cooper A; Montag C
Curr Opin Psychol; 2020 Dec; 36():44-48. PubMed ID: 32521507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Who is susceptible to online health misinformation? A test of four psychosocial hypotheses.
Scherer LD; McPhetres J; Pennycook G; Kempe A; Allen LA; Knoepke CE; Tate CE; Matlock DD
Health Psychol; 2021 Apr; 40(4):274-284. PubMed ID: 33646806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Fighting misinformation among the most vulnerable users.
Brashier NM
Curr Opin Psychol; 2024 Jun; 57():101813. PubMed ID: 38670015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The effects of subtle misinformation in news headlines.
Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Chang EP; Pillai R
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Dec; 20(4):323-35. PubMed ID: 25347407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Are we willing to share what we believe is true? Factors influencing susceptibility to fake news.
Piksa M; Noworyta K; Gundersen AB; Kunst J; Morzy M; Piasecki J; Rygula R
Front Psychiatry; 2023; 14():1165103. PubMed ID: 37654985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Framing fake news: Asymmetric attribute-framing bias for favorable and unfavorable outcomes.
Kreiner H; Gamliel E
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Feb; 48(2):187-198. PubMed ID: 34694825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Machine Learning to Identify Fake News for COVID-19.
Isaakidou M; Zoulias E; Diomidous M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2021 May; 281():108-112. PubMed ID: 34042715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news.
Scheufele DA; Krause NM
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Apr; 116(16):7662-7669. PubMed ID: 30642953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The distorting effects of producer strategies: Why engagement does not reveal consumer preferences for misinformation.
Stewart AJ; Arechar AA; Rand DG; Plotkin JB
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Mar; 121(10):e2315195121. PubMed ID: 38412133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Overconfidence in news judgments is associated with false news susceptibility.
Lyons BA; Montgomery JM; Guess AM; Nyhan B; Reifler J
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jun; 118(23):. PubMed ID: 34074757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. 'But wait, that isn't real': A proof-of-concept study evaluating 'Project Real', a co-created intervention that helps young people to spot fake news online.
Skipper Y; Jolley D; Reddington J
Br J Dev Psychol; 2023 Nov; 41(4):371-384. PubMed ID: 37386791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
