These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35175333)

  • 1. Reliability of cephalometric superimposition for the assessment of craniofacial changes: a systematic review.
    Graf CC; Dritsas K; Ghamri M; Gkantidis N
    Eur J Orthod; 2022 Sep; 44(5):477-490. PubMed ID: 35175333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of methods used for 3-dimensional superimposition of craniofacial skeletal structures: a systematic review.
    Mai DD; Stucki S; Gkantidis N
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9263. PubMed ID: 32547877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of techniques used for superimposition of maxillary and mandibular 3D surface models to evaluate tooth movement: a systematic review.
    Stucki S; Gkantidis N
    Eur J Orthod; 2020 Nov; 42(5):559-570. PubMed ID: 31742598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods.
    Lenza MA; Carvalho AA; Lenza EB; Lenza MG; Torres HM; Souza JB
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 26154453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Superimposition of serial 3-dimensional facial photographs to assess changes over time: A systematic review.
    Wampfler JJ; Gkantidis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Feb; 161(2):182-197.e2. PubMed ID: 34688517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of hand-traced and computer-based cephalometric superimpositions.
    Huja SS; Grubaugh EL; Rummel AM; Fields HW; Beck FM
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):428-35. PubMed ID: 19413396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Superimposition-Based Cephalometric Method to Quantitate Craniofacial Changes.
    Al-Taai N; Levring Jäghagen E; Persson M; Ransjö M; Westerlund A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 34069290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The application and accuracy of feature matching on automated cephalometric superimposition.
    Jiang Y; Song G; Yu X; Dou Y; Li Q; Liu S; Han B; Xu T
    BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Mar; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 32192440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of three-dimensional anterior cranial base superimposition methods for assessment of overall hard tissue changes: A systematic review.
    Ponce-Garcia C; Lagravere-Vich M; Cevidanes LHS; de Olivera Ruellas AC; Carey J; Flores-Mir C
    Angle Orthod; 2018 Mar; 88(2):233-245. PubMed ID: 29189039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cephalometric superimposition on the occipital condyles as a longitudinal growth assessment reference: I-point and I-curve.
    Standerwick R; Roberts E; Hartsfield J; Babler W; Kanomi R
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2008 Dec; 291(12):1603-10. PubMed ID: 18833570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Craniofacial shape in patients with beta thalassaemia: a geometric morphometric analysis.
    Roussos P; Mitsea A; Halazonetis D; Sifakakis I
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1686. PubMed ID: 33462286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial changes in the relationship of the mandible and maxilla with different extraction patterns and techniques.
    MacGilpin DH; Araujo EA; Behrents RG; Rowan KB
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Jul; 81(4):584-91. PubMed ID: 21306228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cephalometric assessment of craniofacial morphology in patients with treacher Collins syndrome.
    Kapadia H; Shetye PR; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1141-5. PubMed ID: 23851757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Accuracy and reliability of three-dimensional craniofacial cone-beam CT superimposition method based on voxel registration].
    Zhou GH; Chen L; Sun YY; Ge N; Su L; Bai YX
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):475-9. PubMed ID: 27511038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy and reliability of landmark-based, surface-based and voxel-based 3D cone-beam computed tomography superimposition methods.
    Ghoneima A; Cho H; Farouk K; Kula K
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Nov; 20(4):227-236. PubMed ID: 28960842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods.
    Arat ZM; Rübendüz M; Akgül AA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 12940557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The variability and reliability of two maxillary and mandibular superimposition techniques. Part II.
    Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Nov; 106(5):463-71. PubMed ID: 7977186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The validity of superimposing oblique cephalometric radiographs to assess tooth movement: an implant study.
    Sakima MT; Sakima CG; Melsen B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Sep; 126(3):344-53. PubMed ID: 15356499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of differential growth and orthodontic treatment outcome by regional cephalometric superpositions.
    Efstratiadis SS; Cohen G; Ghafari J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 10371427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of 3-dimensional superimposition techniques on various skeletal structures of the head using surface models.
    Gkantidis N; Schauseil M; Pazera P; Zorkun B; Katsaros C; Ludwig B
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0118810. PubMed ID: 25706151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.